This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2026-05-07 12:45:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Dan Albas",
"fr": "Dan Albas"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"9312770\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Mr. Speaker, if members read any newspaper in British Columbia, they are going to read about the mayor of Richmond, who has broadly raised this issue while the province and federal government said nothing. They made clear representation on private property rights.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"9312771\" data-originallang=\"en\">All we are asking in this motion today, and of Liberal members, is to start listening to British Columbians and those they have elected who have been raising this alarm. They have had lots of time. The fact that they are now sending out members from British Columbia who are just reading talking points, basically giving the same line without concrete action, says to me that they are prepared to vote against this, because they truly do not protect the private property rights of British Columbians or anyone else.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"9312770\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, en lisant n'importe quel journal de la Colombie\u2011Britannique, les d\u00e9put\u00e9s apprendront que le maire de Richmond a soulev\u00e9 publiquement la question, mais que la province et le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral sont rest\u00e9s muets. Leur position est claire sur les droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 priv\u00e9e.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"9312771\" data-originallang=\"en\">Tout ce que nous demandons aux d\u00e9put\u00e9s lib\u00e9raux dans la motion d'aujourd'hui, c'est de commencer \u00e0 \u00e9couter les habitants de la Colombie\u2011Britannique et leurs \u00e9lus, qui tirent la sonnette d'alarme. Les lib\u00e9raux ont eu beaucoup de temps. Le fait qu'ils laissent maintenant des d\u00e9put\u00e9s de la Colombie\u2011Britannique intervenir pour donner des r\u00e9ponses toutes faites et r\u00e9p\u00e9ter la m\u00eame chose sans prendre de mesures concr\u00e8tes me porte \u00e0 croire qu'ils sont pr\u00eats \u00e0 voter contre la motion. C'est parce qu'ils ne d\u00e9fendent absolument pas les droits li\u00e9s \u00e0 la propri\u00e9t\u00e9 priv\u00e9e des Britanno\u2011Colombiens ni de qui que ce soit d'autre.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2026/5/7/dan-albas-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/dan-albas/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4841/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "13505100",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Business of Supply",
"fr": "Travaux des subsides"
},
"h3": {
"en": "Opposition Motion\u2014Protection of Private Property Rights in Canada",
"fr": "Motion de l'opposition \u2014 Protection des droits de propri\u00e9t\u00e9 priv\u00e9e au Canada"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2026/5/7/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2026%2F5%2F7%2F"
}
}