This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2024-06-05 14:25:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Hon. Pierre Poilievre (Leader of the Opposition, CPC)",
"fr": "L\u2019hon. Pierre Poilievre (chef de l\u2019opposition, PCC)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"8457417\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, we do not need secrets and confidentiality. That is what got us into this problem in the first place. We need the facts so that Canadians can judge.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8457418\" data-originallang=\"en\">Just as in the case of the green slush fund, the Auditor General revealed $123 million of spending that broke the rules, $59 million of projects that never should have been awarded money at all and $76 million in money gone to companies connected to Liberal-appointed members, including $217,000 to the chair of the fund that was giving out the money.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8457419\" data-originallang=\"en\">Will the government support our common-sense plan to hand over all this information to the RCMP for a police investigation?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"8457417\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, nous n'avons rien \u00e0 faire des secrets et de la confidentialit\u00e9, d'autant plus que c'est ce qui est \u00e0 l'origine du probl\u00e8me actuel. Nous avons besoin de faits pour que les Canadiens puissent juger par eux-m\u00eames.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8457418\" data-originallang=\"en\">Tout comme dans le cas de la caisse noire environnementale, la v\u00e9rificatrice g\u00e9n\u00e9rale a r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9 que le gouvernement avait d\u00e9pens\u00e9 123 millions de dollars sans respecter les r\u00e8gles, qu'il avait accord\u00e9 59 millions de dollars \u00e0 des projets qui n'auraient jamais d\u00fb \u00eatre approuv\u00e9s et qu'il avait vers\u00e9 76 millions de dollars \u00e0 des entreprises li\u00e9es \u00e0 des personnes nomm\u00e9es par les lib\u00e9raux, dont 217 000 $ \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sidente du fonds qui distribuait l'argent.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8457419\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le gouvernement appuiera-t-il notre proposition pleine de bon sens de transmettre tous ces renseignements \u00e0 la GRC pour qu'elle m\u00e8ne une enqu\u00eate polici\u00e8re?</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2024/6/5/pierre-poilievre-2/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/pierre-poilievre/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4214/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "12796141",
"h1": {
"en": "Oral Questions",
"fr": "Questions orales"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Democratic Institutions",
"fr": "Les institutions d\u00e9mocratiques"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2024/6/5/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2024%2F6%2F5%2F"
}
}