This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2024-10-07 15:10:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "The Speaker",
"fr": "Le Pr\u00e9sident"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"8595076\" data-originallang=\"en\">Colleagues, as I said during question period, there is a matter to which I would like to return. After reviewing the transcript, in one of his questions the <a data-HoCid=\"291215\" href=\"/politicians/pierre-poilievre/\" title=\"Pierre Poilievre\">Leader of the Opposition</a> used language that was very similar to language that was found unparliamentary in the past. Earlier this year, a member accused the Leader of the Opposition of pandering to a regime I think most of us would find odious. That member was asked to withdraw that comment.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8595077\" data-originallang=\"en\">In his question today, the <a data-HoCid=\"291215\" href=\"/politicians/pierre-poilievre/\" title=\"Pierre Poilievre\">Leader of the Opposition</a> accused the <a data-HoCid=\"278918\" href=\"/politicians/melanie-joly/\" title=\"M\u00e9lanie Joly\">Minister of Foreign Affairs</a> of something similar. As I have said before, there are ways to make our points without resorting to these types of comments.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8595078\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would ask that the <a data-HoCid=\"291215\" href=\"/politicians/pierre-poilievre/\" title=\"Pierre Poilievre\">Leader of the Opposition</a> withdraw his comment at the earliest opportunity.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"8595076\" data-originallang=\"en\">Chers coll\u00e8gues, comme je l'ai dit pendant la p\u00e9riode des questions, il y a quelque chose sur quoi j'aimerais revenir. Apr\u00e8s avoir relu la transcription, j'ai constat\u00e9 que, dans une de ses questions, le <a data-HoCid=\"291215\" href=\"/politicians/pierre-poilievre/\" title=\"Pierre Poilievre\">chef de l'opposition</a> avait tenu des propos tr\u00e8s semblables \u00e0 d'autres propos d\u00e9j\u00e0 jug\u00e9s non parlementaires. En effet, au d\u00e9but de l'ann\u00e9e, un d\u00e9put\u00e9 avait accus\u00e9 le chef de l'opposition de courtiser un r\u00e9gime que la plupart d'entre nous, je crois, trouvent odieux. Ce d\u00e9put\u00e9 avait \u00e9t\u00e9 invit\u00e9 \u00e0 se r\u00e9tracter.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8595077\" data-originallang=\"en\">Dans sa question d'aujourd'hui, le <a data-HoCid=\"291215\" href=\"/politicians/pierre-poilievre/\" title=\"Pierre Poilievre\">chef de l'opposition</a> a accus\u00e9 la <a data-HoCid=\"278918\" href=\"/politicians/melanie-joly/\" title=\"M\u00e9lanie Joly\">ministre des Affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res</a> de quelque chose de semblable. Comme je l'ai d\u00e9j\u00e0 dit, il y a moyen de faire valoir son point de vue sans recourir \u00e0 ce genre d'observations.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8595078\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je demande donc au <a data-HoCid=\"291215\" href=\"/politicians/pierre-poilievre/\" title=\"Pierre Poilievre\">chef de l'opposition</a> de retirer ses paroles \u00e0 la premi\u00e8re occasion.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2024/10/7/the-speaker-5/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/greg-fergus/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4424/",
"procedural": true,
"source_id": "12909598",
"h1": {
"en": "Oral Questions",
"fr": "Questions orales"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Attack in Israel",
"fr": "L'attentat en Isra\u00ebl"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2024/10/7/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2024%2F10%2F7%2F"
}
}