This is a single speech (house debate) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2024-10-07 18:25:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Peter Julian",
        "fr": "M. Peter Julian"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"8595540\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Madam Speaker, of course, Conservatives laugh at this. They laugh at corruption. They laugh when insiders in the Conservative Party get their benefits. We certainly have seen how lobbyists have taken over the Conservative national executive and their campaign organization, so good luck with any grocery food price gouging ending because the Conservatives are embedded with lobbyists.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8595541\" data-originallang=\"en\">I wanted to ask my colleague about this. The ATS scandal was $400 million. Conservatives blocked any investigation. The G8 misspending was a billion dollars, and they shut down any inquiry. The Phoenix pay system cost Canadian taxpayers, under the Conservatives, $2.2 billion, and Conservatives refused any investigation. There was also $3.1 billion in anti-terrorism funding that had no paper trail, and Conservatives shut down the investigation. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8595542\" data-originallang=\"en\">The question is very simple: Do Conservatives apologize for all of their corruption and misspending during the Harper regime?</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"8595540\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, \u00e9videmment, les conservateurs en rient. Ils trouvent la corruption amusante. Ils trouvent amusant que des proches du Parti conservateur aient tir\u00e9 avantage de la situation. Nous constatons certainement \u00e0 quel point les lobbyistes contr\u00f4lent l'ex\u00e9cutif national du Parti conservateur et l'organisation de ses campagnes. Les chances sont bien minces que les prix abusifs cessent dans les \u00e9piceries, car les conservateurs sont de connivence avec les lobbyistes.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8595541\" data-originallang=\"en\">Voici le sujet de ma question. Le scandale d'ATS a co\u00fbt\u00e9 400 millions de dollars. Les conservateurs ont bloqu\u00e9 la tenue de toute enqu\u00eate. Les d\u00e9penses inappropri\u00e9es relatives au sommet du G8 ont co\u00fbt\u00e9 1 milliard de dollars, mais les conservateurs ont bloqu\u00e9 la tenue d'une enqu\u00eate. Le syst\u00e8me de paie Ph\u00e9nix a co\u00fbt\u00e9 2,2 milliards de dollars aux contribuables canadiens sous les conservateurs, mais ceux-ci ont refus\u00e9 la tenue de toute enqu\u00eate. Il y a \u00e9galement eu 3,1 milliards de dollars qui auraient servi \u00e0 financer des activit\u00e9s de lutte contre le terrorisme, mais pour lesquels nous n'avons aucune trace \u00e9crite, et les conservateurs ont emp\u00each\u00e9 la tenue d'une enqu\u00eate.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8595542\" data-originallang=\"en\">La question est tr\u00e8s simple. Les conservateurs pr\u00e9senteront-ils leurs excuses pour toute la corruption et les d\u00e9penses inappropri\u00e9es qu'il y a eu sous le gouvernement Harper?</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2024/10/7/peter-julian-8/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/peter-julian/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4198/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "p8595540",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Orders of the Day",
        "fr": "Ordre du jour"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Privilege",
        "fr": "Privil\u00e8ge"
    },
    "h3": {
        "en": "Sitting Resumed",
        "fr": "Reprise de la s\u00e9ance"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2024/10/7/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2024%2F10%2F7%2F"
    }
}