This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2024-10-24 16:35:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Kevin Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.)",
"fr": "M. Kevin Lamoureux (secr\u00e9taire parlementaire de la leader du gouvernement \u00e0 la Chambre des communes, Lib.)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"8644339\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Madam Speaker, I am wondering if the member can just expand in regard to the issue of the filibuster. I think it is important that what is being asked is for this report to go to the procedure and House affairs committee. That is what the Speaker's ruling is. The Conservatives, on the other hand, continue to not only filibuster the main motion but also the amendment, and the amendment to the amendment. They are the ones who are actually filibustering and they are trying to get the Liberal government to say no to the RCMP, the Auditor General of Canada and the former law clerk when it comes to directly collecting documents and handing them directly to the RCMP.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8644340\" data-originallang=\"en\">That is wrong yet the Conservatives believe it is right. Can the member indicate why they are filibustering?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"8644339\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, je me demande si le d\u00e9put\u00e9 peut nous en dire plus sur la question de l'obstruction. Je pense qu'il est important de souligner que la demande porte sur le renvoi de ce rapport au comit\u00e9 de la proc\u00e9dure et des affaires de la Chambre. C'est ce que dit la d\u00e9cision de la pr\u00e9sidence. Toutefois, les conservateurs continuent de faire obstruction non seulement \u00e0 la motion principale, mais aussi \u00e0 son amendement et \u00e0 son sous-amendement. Ce sont eux qui font de l'obstruction et qui essaient d'amener le gouvernement lib\u00e9ral \u00e0 dire non \u00e0 la GRC, \u00e0 la v\u00e9rificatrice g\u00e9n\u00e9rale du Canada et \u00e0 l'ancien l\u00e9giste pour ce qui est de recueillir directement les documents et de les remettre directement \u00e0 la GRC.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8644340\" data-originallang=\"en\">C'est inacceptable, mais les conservateurs croient que c'est correct. Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 peut-il nous dire pourquoi ils font de l'obstruction?</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2024/10/24/kevin-lamoureux-10/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/kevin-lamoureux/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4032/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "12947461",
"h1": {
"en": "Orders of the Day",
"fr": "Ordre du jour"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Privilege",
"fr": "Privil\u00e8ge"
},
"h3": {
"en": "Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs",
"fr": "Le renvoi au Comit\u00e9 permanent de la proc\u00e9dure et des affaires de la Chambre"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2024/10/24/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2024%2F10%2F24%2F"
}
}