Speech (House debate)

{
    "time": "2023-06-19 12:25:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Hon. Michelle Rempel Garner",
        "fr": "L\u2019hon. Michelle Rempel Garner"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7877116\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, when you are making your ruling on this, I would ask that you look to the response to Question No. 1113, which is the question on which my colleague from <a data-HoCid=\"278214\" href=\"/politicians/dan-albas/\" title=\"Dan Albas\">Central Okanagan\u2014Similkameen\u2014Nicola</a> is raising his additional information. I would ask you to look specifically at the language under the NRCan response, which is different from other departments. Other departments actually undertook a search of these contracts, but NRCan used what it referred to in the ATIP as \u201chigh-level limitation language\u201d.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7877117\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would also ask you, Speaker, when you do that, to look at how there is similar language now from departments across all other Order Paper questions. I suspect that if there are further ATIPs, we will find the government has adopted an approach of \u201chigh-level limitation language\u201d. It is a copy-and-paste across departments, which is a purposeful attempt to deny members of information, and goes against the spirit of the Standing Orders.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7877118\" data-originallang=\"en\">Thank you for your consideration, Mr. Speaker.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7877116\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, lorsque vous prendrez votre d\u00e9cision, je vous demanderais d'examiner la r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 la question n<sup>o</sup> 1113, sur laquelle mon coll\u00e8gue de <a data-HoCid=\"278214\" href=\"/politicians/dan-albas/\" title=\"Dan Albas\">Central Okanagan\u2014Similkameen\u2014Nicola</a> s'appuie pour demander un compl\u00e9ment d'information. Je vous demanderais d'examiner le libell\u00e9 de la r\u00e9ponse de Ressources naturelles Canada, qui est diff\u00e9rent de celui des autres minist\u00e8res. D'autres minist\u00e8res ont en effet entrepris une recherche de ces contrats, mais Ressources naturelles Canada a utilis\u00e9 ce qu'on appelle un \u00ab langage dit restrictif \u00bb dans la r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 la demande d'acc\u00e8s \u00e0 l'information.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7877117\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vous demanderais \u00e9galement, monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, dans le cadre de votre r\u00e9flexion, d'examiner la similitude des termes utilis\u00e9s par les minist\u00e8res dans toutes les autres questions inscrites au Feuilleton. Je soup\u00e7onne que s'il y a d'autres demandes d'acc\u00e8s \u00e0 l'information, nous constaterons que le gouvernement a adopt\u00e9 la m\u00eame approche en utilisant un \u00ab langage dit restrictif \u00bb. Il s'agit d'un copier-coller entre les minist\u00e8res, ce qui constitue une tentative d\u00e9lib\u00e9r\u00e9e de priver les d\u00e9put\u00e9s de certains renseignements et va \u00e0 l'encontre de l'esprit du R\u00e8glement.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7877118\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vous remercie de votre attention, monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident.</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2023/6/19/michelle-rempel-2/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/michelle-rempel/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4385/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "12302183",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Private Members' Business",
        "fr": "Affaires \u00e9manant des d\u00e9put\u00e9s"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Privilege",
        "fr": "Privil\u00e8ge"
    },
    "h3": {
        "en": "Alleged Breach of Member's Right to Information",
        "fr": "La violation pr\u00e9sum\u00e9e du droit \u00e0 l'information d'un d\u00e9put\u00e9"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2023/6/19/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2023%2F6%2F19%2F"
    }
}