This is a single speech (house debate) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2023-02-14 12:25:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Ms. Monique Pauz\u00e9 (Repentigny, BQ)",
        "fr": "Mme Monique Pauz\u00e9 (Repentigny, BQ)"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7577524\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Mr. Speaker, the preamble to the opposition motion contains many truths. I will refer once again to the text of the motion. We agree with the part that says, \u201cfire...consultants\u201d. McKinsey, for example, recommended investing in carbon capture and storage when we know it is too costly and ineffective.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7577525\" data-originallang=\"fr\">The motion also says, \u201ccut waste\u201d. We agree with that too, especially when it comes to oil subsidies. That $3.6 billion could be rapidly redirected to carbon capture and sequestration. I am sure the opposition would vote in favour of that.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7577526\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Oil companies have been raking in mind-boggling profits thanks to high gas prices. Does anyone really think they need money? Why are the Conservatives not talking about that? </p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7577524\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, dans le pr\u00e9ambule de la motion de l'opposition, il y a beaucoup de constats qui sont justes. Je vais encore me r\u00e9f\u00e9rer au texte de la motion. D'abord, quand on dit de \u00ab cong\u00e9dier les experts-conseils \u00bb, nous sommes d'accord. La firme McKinsey, par exemple, propose d'investir dans la capture et le stockage du carbone alors que c'est reconnu comme \u00e9tant trop cher et inefficace.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7577525\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Ensuite, on parle de \u00ab cesser le gaspillage \u00bb. Nous sommes d'accord l\u00e0 aussi. Nous pensons aux subventions vers\u00e9es aux p\u00e9troli\u00e8res. C'est 3,6 milliards de dollars qui sont pr\u00eats \u00e0 \u00eatre donn\u00e9s pour la s\u00e9questration et le captage du carbone. Je suis persuad\u00e9e que l'opposition va voter en faveur de cela.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7577526\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Est-ce qu'on pense vraiment que les p\u00e9troli\u00e8res ont besoin d'argent alors qu'elles engrangent des profits faramineux gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 la hausse du prix de l'essence? Pourquoi les conservateurs n'en parlent-ils pas?</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2023/2/14/monique-pauze-2/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/monique-pauze/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4480/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "12059510",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Business of Supply",
        "fr": "Travaux des subsides"
    },
    "h3": {
        "en": "Opposition Motion\u2014Rising Inflation and Cost of Living",
        "fr": "Motion de l'opposition \u2014 La hausse de l'inflation et du co\u00fbt de la vie"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2023/2/14/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2023%2F2%2F14%2F"
    }
}