This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2023-02-10 10:55:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Hon. Michelle Rempel Garner",
"fr": "L\u2019hon. Michelle Rempel Garner"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7569018\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, we are not talking about an industry in the case I raised. We are talking about a member of the other place, a sitting parliamentarian; a consultant who was paid for by tax dollars through that parliamentarian's office, as far as I can tell on her expense disclosures; and the former chief of staff to the defence minister. There is also a litany of associates of the government who were associated with the affidavit that was filed, so this is not about an industry.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7569019\" data-originallang=\"en\">The question I would pose back to my colleague is how anybody could have any confidence in the government, if we are talking about members of the government, parliamentarians, being allowed to issue inauthentic documentation without any sort of recourse or remedy, even though, apparently, they have known about this for a while.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7569018\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, le cas que j'ai soulev\u00e9 ne se rapporte pas \u00e0 une fili\u00e8re. Il se rapporte \u00e0 une s\u00e9natrice, une parlementaire en fonction, \u00e0 une consultante pay\u00e9e \u00e0 m\u00eame les fonds publics par l'entremise du bureau de cette s\u00e9natrice, d'apr\u00e8s ce que r\u00e9v\u00e8lent ses d\u00e9clarations de d\u00e9penses, ainsi qu'\u00e0 l'ancien chef de cabinet du ministre de la D\u00e9fense. Il y a aussi une foule d'associ\u00e9s du gouvernement dont le nom est mentionn\u00e9 dans l'affidavit qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9. Ce n'est donc pas une fili\u00e8re qui est en cause.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7569019\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je demanderais \u00e0 mon coll\u00e8gue comment quiconque pourrait faire confiance au gouvernement quand il laisse certains de ses membres, des parlementaires, d\u00e9livrer de faux documents, sans que les parties touch\u00e9es aient le moindre recours et sans qu'il propose aucune solution, alors que, apparemment, il est au courant de la situation depuis un certain temps.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2023/2/10/michelle-rempel-5/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/michelle-rempel/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4385/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "12051683",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Immigration and Refugee Protection Act",
"fr": "La Loi sur l'immigration et la protection des r\u00e9fugi\u00e9s"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2023/2/10/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2023%2F2%2F10%2F"
}
}