This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2022-06-20 17:30:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Kevin Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, Lib.)",
"fr": "M. Kevin Lamoureux (secr\u00e9taire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement \u00e0 la Chambre des communes, Lib.)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7257074\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I appreciate many of the comments that my colleague across the way made, but I take a different approach. He made reference to Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a> and the amendment process. I think it clearly demonstrated the interest of the government, when modernizing the legislation, to get it right. We saw a number of amendments that, in fact, ultimately changed the form of Bill <a data-HoCid=\"11528728\" href=\"/bills/44-1/C-11/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-11</a>, and I think that is good for the industry as a whole and for future Canadian content.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7257075\" data-originallang=\"en\">The member made reference to the word \u201cfreedom\u201d, and I think there is a fear factor out there, as some are trying to say that this is a limit on an individual's freedoms. Could he provide his thoughts with regard to the issue of the Conservative Party in essence saying that this is an attack on individual freedoms?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7257074\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ai aim\u00e9 une bonne partie des observations faites par mon coll\u00e8gue d'en face, mais je vois les choses d'un autre \u0153il. Il a parl\u00e9 du projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C\u201110</a> et du processus d'amendement. Voil\u00e0 qui prouve hors de tout doute, selon moi, que le gouvernement tient \u00e0 bien faire les choses quand il modernise une loi. Il y a toute une s\u00e9rie d'amendements qui ont modifi\u00e9 en profondeur le texte du projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"11528728\" href=\"/bills/44-1/C-11/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C\u201111</a>, et j'estime qu'il s'agit d'une bonne nouvelle pour l'ensemble du milieu et pour le contenu canadien en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7257075\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 a aussi parl\u00e9 de libert\u00e9, et je crois que certains essaient de faire peur aux gens en leur disant qu'on les privera d'une partie de leurs libert\u00e9s. Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 pourrait-il nous dire ce qu'il pense de la position des conservateurs, qui pr\u00e9tendent essentiellement que ce projet de loi est une atteinte aux libert\u00e9s individuelles?</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2022/6/20/kevin-lamoureux-8/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/kevin-lamoureux/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4032/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11780887",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Online Streaming Act",
"fr": "Loi sur la diffusion continue en ligne"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2022/6/20/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2022%2F6%2F20%2F"
}
}