Speech (House debate)

{
    "time": "2022-02-21 07:20:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mrs. Rosemarie Falk (Battlefords\u2014Lloydminster, CPC)",
        "fr": "Mme Rosemarie Falk (Battlefords\u2014Lloydminster, PCC)"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6966804\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, right off the hop, I want to acknowledge that it is Family Day here in Saskatchewan, and I hope the residents of Battlefords\u2014Lloydminster, despite the cold weather, are able to go out and enjoy some activities, since Saskatchewan has lifted almost all of its restrictions.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966805\" data-originallang=\"en\">We know that the invocation of the Emergencies Act is not only unprecedented but also extreme. While the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> has declared a public order emergency throughout Canada to justify this, there is no evidence that there is a public emergency to necessitate these broad, sweeping powers. I have listened closely to the comments from the Prime Minister and his government in the House and what they have told Canadians. I have yet to hear a legitimate justification for the implementation of this act.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966806\" data-originallang=\"en\">The reality is that our country is hurting right now, and it is disheartening. The current state of affairs is a direct consequence of the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a>'s failed leadership. At a time when we need leadership to bring Canadians together, the Prime Minister is acting like the Liberal Party leader, not the Prime Minister of Canada.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966807\" data-originallang=\"en\">At the very onset, before the \u201cfreedom convoy\u201d even rolled into Ottawa, the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> publicly insulted Canadians and dismissed the genuine concerns being raised, doubling down on the division that his government's rhetoric and policies have sown into this country throughout the pandemic. Whether it be hubris or stubbornness, the Prime Minister has refused to make even the smallest of efforts to demonstrate to Canadians that he has listened to, heard and understood their concerns.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966808\" data-originallang=\"en\"> As we know, this past week, the Conservatives presented the Liberal government with an extremely reasonable opportunity to do just that. The House voted on a Conservative motion that would have compelled the government to table in Parliament, by the end of the month, a plan, just a plan, to bring an end to the federal mandates and restrictions. This was a very reasonable motion and, at the very least, would have helped to bring some resolution to the growing frustration. It would have also given all Canadians some clarity, which, quite frankly, they are owed. Shamefully, we know the Liberals rejected the motion.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966809\" data-originallang=\"en\">What has been even more troubling is that the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> and his Liberal government have refused to tell Canadians what metrics are being used to justify the continued enforcement of federal mandates and restrictions. Is it vaccination rates? Is it case counts? Is it hospital capacity? Is it simply Liberal ideology? Canadians do not know.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966810\" data-originallang=\"en\">Provinces across the country have presented plans to lift restrictions under their jurisdictions. Countries around the world with lower vaccination rates than those of Canada have lifted their restrictions. Canadians cannot be expected to live with federal mandates and restrictions indefinitely. We know this because I have heard from my constituents and I know every single member of the House has heard from constituents.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966811\" data-originallang=\"en\">Canadians have sacrificed so much over the past two years and they deserve answers from the Liberal government. However, instead of answers or plans, the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> has invoked the Emergencies Act. What is it for? Is it to crack down on protesters and those who have supported protests? To be clear, the rule of law is a fundamental principle in our Canadian democracy. Law enforcement agencies have a responsibility to enforce the law and we expect them to do so, but we know that they do not need the Emergencies Act to enforce the law. This extreme suspension of civil liberties is not about public safety or restoring order or upholding the rule of law. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966812\" data-originallang=\"en\">The Emergencies Act is clear in its definition of a national emergency that would give grounds for its implementation. The act defines a national emergency as an \u201curgent and critical situation\u201d that \u201ccannot be effectively dealt with under any other law of Canada\u201d. There is no such situation.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966813\" data-originallang=\"en\">Even in his own words, the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> has said that the Emergencies Act should not be the first or the second resort. The start of the clearing of illegal blockades at our borders, whether it be the Ambassador Bridge or the Coutts, Alberta, crossing, perfectly demonstrates that law enforcement agencies already have the necessary tools at their disposal to enforce the law.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966814\" data-originallang=\"en\">That said, this really becomes about the Prime Minister granting law enforcement and financial institutions extraordinary powers to punish Canadians who support a cause that does not have his approval. Through this proclamation of a national emergency, the government has given itself the right to freeze the personal and business back accounts and assets of Canadians. There are so many unanswered questions about this draconian measure and how the government intends to apply it. This is a very dangerous precedent. At every turn, the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> and his ministers have failed to give any straight answers. I have not seen justification for this overreach. This is not how the government should operate in a free and democratic society.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966815\" data-originallang=\"en\">It is also evident that there is no consensus among the premiers to support the Liberal government's extreme response. We know there is a duty to consult built into this act, and we know that with the Liberal government, there is rarely, if ever, a collaborative process, let alone a transparent process.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966816\" data-originallang=\"en\">The <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> certainly does not have the support of Saskatchewan's premier. Premier Scott Moe has clearly stated that Saskatchewan does not support the Liberal government's invocation of the Emergencies Act. He has gone on to say that the Prime Minister has gone too far with the use of this act and has called on all parliamentarians to stop this abuse of power.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966817\" data-originallang=\"en\">Premier Scott Moe has been very vocal in his opposition to the use of this act, but he is not alone. The Premiers of Alberta, Quebec, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and P.E.I. have all expressed their opposition to the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a>'s actions. Therefore, in addition to encroaching on civil liberties without clear justification, the implementation of the Emergencies Act is also encroaching on provincial jurisdiction without their expressed consensus, which seems to be a trend for the government. It does not seem to care about what jurisdiction it is encroaching on. Again, this debate is not to be taken lightly. This is a matter of principle with the very high stakes of safeguarding our fundamental freedoms.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966818\" data-originallang=\"en\">It is also worth noting that it is clear the world is watching Canada at this moment. In considering the validity of the government's action, members of the House must decide whether the high threshold set out in the Emergencies Act to justify its use has been met. If the House gives the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> these unprecedented and extreme powers without the legal and moral justification to do so, Canada loses credibility on the world stage to criticize abuses of power.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966819\" data-originallang=\"en\">I want each and every member of the House to think which side of history they want to be on. The actions of this place have long-lasting consequences. Either the threshold needed to implement the Emergencies Act has been met or it has not. Any doubt in that threshold should be enough to warrant opposition to it, because the personal cost to Canadians and to our fundamental freedoms is too high to get it wrong.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966820\" data-originallang=\"en\">I will not be supporting this motion. I do not believe that the necessary threshold has been met to justify the use of the Emergencies Act. The government has not provided sufficient evidence that we are in a national emergency. There is no proof that law enforcement agencies need additional and far-reaching powers to enforce the law. Canadians should not face harmful financial penalties for opposing government policy.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966821\" data-originallang=\"en\">We cannot sidestep the simple fact that this really is a crisis of failed leadership. There has been no effort made by the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> to bring a peaceful resolution to this impasse. In fact, it is quite the opposite. The Prime Minister has been purposeful in his words to divide, to stigmatize and to insult Canadians with whom he does not agree.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966822\" data-originallang=\"en\">It is time to reject the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a>'s divisive politics and abuse of power. The Emergencies Act must be revoked and we need to\u2014</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6966804\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, d\u00e8s le d\u00e9part, je souligne que c\u2019est le Jour de la famille ici, en Saskatchewan, et j\u2019esp\u00e8re que les habitants de Battlefords-Lloydminster, malgr\u00e9 le temps froid, pourront sortir et s\u2019adonner \u00e0 certaines activit\u00e9s, puisque la Saskatchewan a lev\u00e9 presque toutes les restrictions.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966805\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous savons que l\u2019invocation de la Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence est une mesure non seulement sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent, mais aussi extr\u00eame. Le <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 l'\u00e9tat d'urgence public dans l\u2019ensemble du Canada pour justifier cette mesure, mais rien ne prouve qu\u2019il y ait une urgence publique qui n\u00e9cessite que le gouvernement s'octroie des pouvoirs si vastes et si extraordinaires. J\u2019ai \u00e9cout\u00e9 attentivement les observations du premier ministre et des membres de son gouvernement \u00e0 la Chambre et ce qu\u2019ils ont dit aux Canadiens. Je n\u2019ai pas encore entendu de justification l\u00e9gitime quant \u00e0 la mise en \u0153uvre de cette loi.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966806\" data-originallang=\"en\">En r\u00e9alit\u00e9, le Canada est en difficult\u00e9 en ce moment, et c\u2019est d\u00e9courageant. La situation actuelle est directement attribuable \u00e0 la mauvaise gestion du <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a>. Alors qu'il faut un v\u00e9ritable leadership pour unir les Canadiens, le premier ministre agit en tant que chef du Parti lib\u00e9ral, et non comme il le devrait en tant que premier ministre du Canada.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966807\" data-originallang=\"en\">D\u00e8s le d\u00e9but, avant m\u00eame que le \u00ab convoi de la libert\u00e9 \u00bb n\u2019arrive \u00e0 Ottawa, le <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> a publiquement insult\u00e9 les Canadiens et rejet\u00e9 les v\u00e9ritables pr\u00e9occupations soulev\u00e9es, renfor\u00e7ant davantage la division que les propos et les politiques de son gouvernement ont sem\u00e9e dans le pays tout au long de la pand\u00e9mie. Qu\u2019il s\u2019agisse d\u2019orgueil ou d\u2019ent\u00eatement, le premier ministre a refus\u00e9 de faire le moindre effort pour montrer aux Canadiens qu\u2019il avait \u00e9cout\u00e9, entendu et compris leurs pr\u00e9occupations.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966808\" data-originallang=\"en\">Comme nous le savons, la semaine derni\u00e8re, les conservateurs ont offert au gouvernement lib\u00e9ral une occasion extr\u00eamement raisonnable de se montrer \u00e0 l'\u00e9coute. La Chambre a vot\u00e9 sur une motion des conservateurs qui aurait oblig\u00e9 le gouvernement \u00e0 d\u00e9poser au Parlement, avant la fin du mois, un plan, rien qu\u2019un plan, pour mettre fin aux exigences vaccinales et aux restrictions impos\u00e9es par le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral. Il s\u2019agissait d\u2019une motion tr\u00e8s raisonnable qui, \u00e0 tout le moins, aurait aid\u00e9 \u00e0 diminuer la frustration croissante. Elle aurait \u00e9galement donn\u00e9 \u00e0 tous les Canadiens un peu de clart\u00e9, ce qui, tr\u00e8s franchement, leur est d\u00fb. Malheureusement, les lib\u00e9raux ont rejet\u00e9 la motion.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966809\" data-originallang=\"en\">Ce qui est encore plus troublant, c\u2019est que le <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> et son gouvernement lib\u00e9ral ont refus\u00e9 de dire aux Canadiens quels param\u00e8tres sont utilis\u00e9s pour justifier l\u2019application continue des exigences vaccinales et des restrictions impos\u00e9es par le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral. S\u2019agit-il des taux de vaccination? Du nombre de cas? De la capacit\u00e9 des h\u00f4pitaux? Est-ce simplement \u00e0 cause de l\u2019id\u00e9ologie lib\u00e9rale? Les Canadiens ne le savent pas.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966810\" data-originallang=\"en\">Les provinces de tout le pays ont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 des plans pour la lev\u00e9e des restrictions sur le territoire. Des pays du monde entier ayant des taux de vaccination inf\u00e9rieurs \u00e0 ceux du Canada ont lev\u00e9 les restrictions. On ne peut s\u2019attendre \u00e0 ce que les Canadiens s\u2019accommodent ind\u00e9finiment des exigences vaccinales et des restrictions impos\u00e9es par le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral. Nous le savons parce que j\u2019ai entendu le son de cloche de mes \u00e9lecteurs et que tous les d\u00e9put\u00e9s de la Chambre ont entendu celui de leurs \u00e9lecteurs.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966811\" data-originallang=\"en\">Les Canadiens ont fait \u00e9norm\u00e9ment de sacrifices au cours des deux derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es et ils m\u00e9ritent des r\u00e9ponses du gouvernement lib\u00e9ral. Cependant, au lieu d'offrir des r\u00e9ponses ou un plan, le <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> a invoqu\u00e9 la Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence. \u00c0 quoi sert cette mesure? Vise-t-elle \u00e0 s\u00e9vir contre les manifestants et ceux qui ont soutenu les manifestations? Soyons clairs, la primaut\u00e9 du droit est un principe fondamental de la d\u00e9mocratie canadienne. Les organismes d\u2019application de la loi ont la responsabilit\u00e9 de faire appliquer la loi et nous nous attendons \u00e0 ce qu\u2019ils le fassent, mais nous savons qu\u2019ils n\u2019ont pas besoin de la Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence pour s'acquitter de cette t\u00e2che. Le recours \u00e0 cette mesure extr\u00eame qui suspend des libert\u00e9s civiles n\u2019a rien \u00e0 voir avec la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 publique, le r\u00e9tablissement de l\u2019ordre ou le respect de la primaut\u00e9 du droit.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966812\" data-originallang=\"en\">La Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence est claire dans sa d\u00e9finition d\u2019une urgence nationale qui justifierait sa mise en \u0153uvre. La loi d\u00e9finit une urgence nationale comme une \u00ab situation de crise nationale \u00bb \u00e0 laquelle \u00ab il n\u2019est pas possible de faire face ad\u00e9quatement sous le r\u00e9gime des lois du Canada \u00bb. Or, une telle situation n\u2019existe pas au Canada.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966813\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> a lui-m\u00eame dit que la Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence ne devrait pas \u00eatre le premier ou le deuxi\u00e8me recours. Le d\u00e9but du d\u00e9blocage des barrages ill\u00e9gaux aux fronti\u00e8res \u2013 qu\u2019il s\u2019agisse du pont Ambassador ou du passage de Coutts, en Alberta \u2013 d\u00e9montre parfaitement que les organismes d\u2019application de la loi disposent d\u00e9j\u00e0 des outils n\u00e9cessaires pour faire respecter la loi.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966814\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cela dit, il s\u2019agit en fait pour le premier ministre d\u2019accorder aux organismes d\u2019application de la loi et aux institutions financi\u00e8res des pouvoirs extraordinaires pour punir les Canadiens qui appuient une cause qu\u2019il n\u2019approuve pas. Par cette proclamation de l'\u00e9tat d'urgence nationale, le gouvernement s\u2019est arrog\u00e9 le droit de geler les comptes et les avoirs personnels et commerciaux de Canadiens. Le recours \u00e0 cette mesure draconienne et la fa\u00e7on dont le gouvernement entend l\u2019appliquer suscitent d'innombrables questions qui sont sans r\u00e9ponse. Il s\u2019agit d\u2019un pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent tr\u00e8s dangereux. Dans aucun cas, le <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> et ses ministres n\u2019ont donn\u00e9 de r\u00e9ponses claires. Je n\u2019ai rien entendu qui justifie cet abus de pouvoir. Ce n\u2019est pas ainsi que le gouvernement devrait fonctionner dans une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 libre et d\u00e9mocratique.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966815\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il est \u00e9galement \u00e9vident qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas de consensus parmi les premiers ministres provinciaux pour appuyer la d\u00e9cision extr\u00eame du gouvernement lib\u00e9ral. Or, cette loi pr\u00e9voit un devoir de consultation, et nous savons que dans le cas du gouvernement lib\u00e9ral, il y a rarement, voire jamais, un processus de collaboration, et encore moins un processus transparent.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966816\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> n\u2019a certainement pas l\u2019appui du premier ministre de la Saskatchewan. Le premier ministre Scott Moe a clairement d\u00e9clar\u00e9 que la Saskatchewan n\u2019appuie pas le recours \u00e0 la Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence par le gouvernement lib\u00e9ral. Il a ajout\u00e9 que le premier ministre est all\u00e9 trop loin en recourant \u00e0 cette loi et a demand\u00e9 \u00e0 tous les parlementaires de mettre fin \u00e0 cet abus de pouvoir.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966817\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le premier ministre Scott Moe a exprim\u00e9 tr\u00e8s clairement son opposition \u00e0 l\u2019utilisation de cette loi, mais il n\u2019est pas le seul. Les premiers ministres de l\u2019Alberta, du Qu\u00e9bec, du Manitoba, du Nouveau-Brunswick, de la Nouvelle-\u00c9cosse et de l\u2019\u00cele du Prince-\u00c9douard ont tous exprim\u00e9 leur opposition \u00e0 la d\u00e9cision du <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a>. Par cons\u00e9quent, en plus d\u2019empi\u00e9ter sur les libert\u00e9s civiles sans justification claire, la mise en \u0153uvre de la Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence empi\u00e8te \u00e9galement sur les comp\u00e9tences des provinces sans leur consentement expr\u00e8s, ce qui semble \u00eatre une tendance du gouvernement qui ne semble pas se soucier de la comp\u00e9tence sur laquelle il empi\u00e8te. Encore une fois, ce d\u00e9bat ne doit pas \u00eatre pris \u00e0 la l\u00e9g\u00e8re. Il s\u2019agit d\u2019une question de principe dont les enjeux sont tr\u00e8s importants pour la sauvegarde de nos libert\u00e9s fondamentales.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966818\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il convient \u00e9galement de noter qu\u2019il est clair que le monde entier observe le Canada en ce moment. En examinant la validit\u00e9 de la d\u00e9cision du gouvernement, les d\u00e9put\u00e9s doivent d\u00e9cider si le seuil \u00e9lev\u00e9 \u00e9tabli dans la Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence pour en justifier le recours a \u00e9t\u00e9 atteint. Si la Chambre accorde au <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> ces pouvoirs extr\u00eames et sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent sans une justification l\u00e9gale et morale, le Canada perd de sa cr\u00e9dibilit\u00e9 sur la sc\u00e8ne mondiale lorsqu'il s'agira de critiquer les abus de pouvoir.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966819\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'exhorte les d\u00e9put\u00e9s \u00e0 r\u00e9fl\u00e9chir \u00e0 quel c\u00f4t\u00e9 de l\u2019histoire ils veulent \u00eatre associ\u00e9s. Les d\u00e9cisions prises dans cette enceinte ont des cons\u00e9quences \u00e0 long terme. Les d\u00e9put\u00e9s doivent se demander si le seuil n\u00e9cessaire \u00e0 la mise en \u0153uvre de la Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence a \u00e9t\u00e9 atteint, ou s'il ne l\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9. Le moindre doute \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard devrait suffire \u00e0 justifier l'opposition \u00e0 cette loi, car une mauvaise d\u00e9cision entra\u00eene un co\u00fbt trop \u00e9lev\u00e9 pour les Canadiens \u00e0 titre individuel et pour les libert\u00e9s fondamentales.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966820\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je n\u2019appuierai pas cette motion. Je ne pense pas que les conditions soient r\u00e9unies pour justifier un recours \u00e0 la Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence. Le gouvernement n\u2019a pas d\u00e9montr\u00e9 l\u2019existence d\u2019une urgence nationale. Rien ne prouve que les services de police ont besoin de pouvoirs suppl\u00e9mentaires consid\u00e9rables pour faire appliquer la loi. Les Canadiens qui s\u2019opposent \u00e0 la politique du gouvernement ne devraient pas \u00eatre expos\u00e9s \u00e0 de lourdes sanctions financi\u00e8res.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966821\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il est \u00e9vident que cette crise a \u00e9t\u00e9 principalement caus\u00e9e par la mauvaise gestion du gouvernement. Le <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> n\u2019a fait aucun effort pour trouver une issue pacifique \u00e0 cette impasse, au contraire. Il s\u2019est employ\u00e9 \u00e0 diviser, \u00e0 stigmatiser et \u00e0 insulter les Canadiens qui ne partagent pas les m\u00eames opinions que lui.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6966822\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il est temps de d\u00e9noncer l\u2019approche clivante et les abus pouvoirs du <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a>. La Loi sur les mesures d\u2019urgence doit \u00eatre suspendue et nous devons\u2026 </p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2022/2/21/rosemarie-falk-1/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/rosemarie-falk/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4462/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "11538046",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Orders Of The Day",
        "fr": "Ordre Du Jour"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Emergencies Act",
        "fr": "La Loi sur les mesures d'urgence"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2022/2/21/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2022%2F2%2F21%2F"
    }
}