Speech (House debate)

{
    "time": "2022-12-01 13:55:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Ms. Marilyn Gladu",
        "fr": "Mme Marilyn Gladu"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7473526\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, I have no problem clarifying. Several of the places I went into were following provincial orders, to be clear, and they were to record who showed up and whether or not they were vaccinated. That is what was done, and that is against PIPA and PIPEDA. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473527\" data-originallang=\"en\">I will turn to the government's record on protecting us in terms of cybersecurity, and talk about Huawei. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473528\" data-originallang=\"en\">In 2018, our Five Eyes partners were concerned about Huawei's connection to the Chinese communist government, and they were not going to allow Huawei into their networks. However, the Canadian government delayed a decision for four years. The Liberals waited until 2022 to ban Huawei. Why did they do that? It was so Bell and TELUS could implement Huawei technology, 4G technology, across the country. That is hardly a protection from a cybersecurity point of view, and it again speaks to why Canadians have lost trust in the government.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473529\" data-originallang=\"en\">However, I will support the bill to go to committee. I have said that we need to do something for cybersecurity, and I have outlined what I think we need to do. I do not think we can leave these huge gaps that have been cited by numerous institutions.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473530\" data-originallang=\"en\"> The University of Toronto has written letters to the government, talking about what is wrong with the bill and what it would like to see. If members have not seen the report it did with the Munk School, called \u201cCybersecurity Will Not Thrive in Darkness\u201d, there are a number of recommendations in the report that talk about what needs to be done to Bill <a data-HoCid=\"11862853\" href=\"/bills/44-1/C-26/\" title=\"An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-26</a> to fix it. I would encourage the government to look at that, and I would expect it to become the substance of amendments that would be brought at committee. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473531\" data-originallang=\"en\">Also, we should look at what the constitutional and civil liberties lawyers are saying. They are very concerned about the parts of the bill that would surveil Canadians, so I think we need to make sure we listen to what they have to say. They have written an open letter to the government, and I would recommend that the government take a look at that as well. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473532\" data-originallang=\"en\">Finally, on accountability, due process and public regulation, there is potential for abuse. I would encourage the government to take a look.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473533\" data-originallang=\"en\">I look forward to more discussion at committee.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7473526\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, je n'ai aucune objection \u00e0 pr\u00e9ciser mon propos. \u00c0 plusieurs endroits o\u00f9 je me suis rendue apr\u00e8s des arr\u00eat\u00e9s minist\u00e9riels provinciaux, les responsables devaient noter l'identit\u00e9 des personnes qui se pr\u00e9sentaient et indiquer si elles avaient \u00e9t\u00e9 vaccin\u00e9es ou non. C\u2019est ce qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 fait, et c\u2019est contraire \u00e0 la Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels et \u00e0 la Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels et les documents \u00e9lectroniques.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473527\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vais maintenant parler du bilan du gouvernement en mati\u00e8re de protection pour ce qui est de la cybers\u00e9curit\u00e9, et aussi parler de Huawei.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473528\" data-originallang=\"en\">En 2018, nos partenaires du Groupe des cinq s'inqui\u00e9taient des liens qu\u2019entretenait Huawei avec le gouvernement communiste chinois, et ils n\u2019avaient pas l'intention de permettre \u00e0 Huawei de leur vendre de l'\u00e9quipement r\u00e9seau. Cependant, le gouvernement du Canada a tard\u00e9 pendant quatre ans \u00e0 prendre une d\u00e9cision l\u00e0-dessus. Les lib\u00e9raux ont attendu jusqu\u2019en 2022 pour interdire Huawei. Pourquoi? Pour que Bell et TELUS puissent mettre en \u0153uvre la technologie Huawei, la technologie 4G, partout au pays. Ce n\u2019est gu\u00e8re une protection du point de vue de la cybers\u00e9curit\u00e9, et cela montre encore une fois pourquoi les Canadiens ne font plus confiance au gouvernement.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473529\" data-originallang=\"en\">Toutefois, j\u2019appuierai le renvoi du projet de loi au comit\u00e9. J\u2019ai dit que nous devions faire quelque chose pour la cybers\u00e9curit\u00e9, et j\u2019ai indiqu\u00e9 ce que je pense que nous devons faire. Je ne pense pas que nous puissions laisser ces \u00e9normes lacunes qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 cit\u00e9es par de nombreuses institutions.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473530\" data-originallang=\"en\">L\u2019Universit\u00e9 de Toronto a \u00e9crit des lettres au gouvernement, pour lui expliquer ce qui ne va pas dans le projet de loi et ce qu\u2019elle aimerait y voir. Si les d\u00e9put\u00e9s n\u2019ont pas pris connaissance du rapport qu\u2019elle a r\u00e9dig\u00e9 avec l\u2019\u00e9cole Munk et qui s'intitule \u00ab Cybersecurity Will Not Thrive in Darkness \u00bb. On y trouve un certain nombre de recommandations sur ce qu\u2019il faut faire pour corriger le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"11862853\" href=\"/bills/44-1/C-26/\" title=\"An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts\">C\u201126</a>. J\u2019encourage le gouvernement \u00e0 examiner ce rapport, qui devrait constituer la pierre d'assise des amendements qui seront pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s au comit\u00e9.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473531\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous devrions \u00e9galement tenir compte de ce que disent les constitutionnalistes et les avocats sp\u00e9cialistes des droits civils. Les dispositions du projet de loi qui concernent la surveillance des Canadiens les inqui\u00e8tent beaucoup, et je pense que nous devons nous assurer d\u2019\u00e9couter ce qu\u2019ils ont \u00e0 dire. Ils ont \u00e9crit une lettre ouverte au gouvernement, et je recommanderais au gouvernement d\u2019y jeter un coup d\u2019\u0153il \u00e9galement.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473532\" data-originallang=\"en\">Enfin, s'agissant de la reddition de comptes, de l\u2019application r\u00e9guli\u00e8re de la loi et de la r\u00e9glementation publique, il existe un potentiel d\u2019abus. J\u2019encourage le gouvernement \u00e0 jeter un coup d\u2019\u0153il \u00e0 cela.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473533\" data-originallang=\"en\">J\u2019ai h\u00e2te que la discussion se poursuive au sein du comit\u00e9.</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2022/12/1/marilyn-gladu-5/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/marilyn-gladu/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4197/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "11968280",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Telecommunications Act",
        "fr": "La Loi sur les t\u00e9l\u00e9communications"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2022/12/1/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2022%2F12%2F1%2F"
    }
}