This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2022-12-01 12:05:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Brian Masse (Windsor West, NDP)",
"fr": "M. Brian Masse (Windsor-Ouest, NPD)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7473253\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I am please to speak today to Bill <a data-HoCid=\"11862853\" href=\"/bills/44-1/C-26/\" title=\"An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-26</a>, an act respecting cybersecurity, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other acts.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473254\" data-originallang=\"en\">It is really important to acknowledge that we are severely behind with regard to our protections in this matter. I am going to quote from myself, from when I once engaged the government and asked them this. \u201cI am very concerned that we are not doing enough in Canada to protect the digital privacy of Canadians and am calling on the government to develop stronger frameworks and guidelines to improve cyber security in Canada. These are critical issues that must be addressed\u201d. They must be addressed for the benefit of Canada, as our economy and commerce are currently under threat, as is our personal privacy.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473255\" data-originallang=\"en\">When did I do that? That was in 2016. From 2016 to today, with the digital changes we have had, is a lifetime of change.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473256\" data-originallang=\"en\">I got a response from the government at that time, basically saying it would refer matters and let them play themselves out in court.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473257\" data-originallang=\"en\">One of the most famous cases that came forward at the time involved the University of Calgary, which had reportedly paid $20,000 in compensation to a group of organizations we do not know to protect the breach they had.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473258\" data-originallang=\"en\">What has taken place over several different cases and also in our current laws has shown that it is okay to pay out crime and it is okay to pay out these types of requests for extortion and not even refer that matter back to the people whose privacy has been breached. We do not even have to report it as a crime to law enforcement agencies. It is very disturbing, to say the least. Getting this legislation is something, but it is still a long way off.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473259\" data-originallang=\"en\">As New Democrats, we recognize very much that there needs to be balance in this. This is why I also wrote at that time to the then privacy commissioner of Canada, Jennifer Stoddart, about the cyber-attacks and data breaches.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473260\" data-originallang=\"en\"> There is concern about the amount of data and one's rights and one's protections and the knowledge one should have as an individual in a democracy. I do not think it is a conspiracy theory to have those kinds of concerns.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473261\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would point to a simple famous case. As New Democrats are well aware, and I think other Canadians are as well, our number one Canadian champion of health care, Tommy Douglas, was spied upon by his own RCMP at that same time. That was in relation to bringing in Medicare. This is very well documented. We still do not have all the records. We still do not have all the information, and it is a very famous case.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473262\" data-originallang=\"en\">Bringing in our number one treasured jewel, health care, led to a case where our own system was spying on an elected representative who was actually declared Canada's greatest Canadian by the public. We do not want to forget about those things because, when we are introducing laws like this, there is a real concern about one's ability to protect oneself and one's privacy, as well as the expansive conditions that are going to change, often with regard to personal privacy.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473263\" data-originallang=\"en\">What also took place after that was that I was very pleased, in 2020, to put a motion forward at the House of Commons industry committee, where we studied, for the first time in Canadian history, fraud calls in Canada.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473264\" data-originallang=\"en\">There are a lot of cyber-attacks through this type of operating system, and we need to remind ourselves that using this type of system, being our Internet service providers and the telecoms sector, is something that is done by giving up the public infrastructure and a regulated system of industry.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473265\" data-originallang=\"en\">We have built a beast, in many ways, that has a low degree of accountability, and we are finally getting some of that restored. There are also some new programs coming in, like STIR/SHAKEN and other types of reporting that is required.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473266\" data-originallang=\"en\">I want to point out that since we have done that, we have another report that will be tabled, or at least a letter. We have not decided yet, and there is still work going on, but we have had a couple more meetings in the industry committee about it and we have really heard lots of testimony that showed that there is more work that can and should be done.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473267\" data-originallang=\"en\">A good example from the previous report that we did was recommendation number five, which went through sharing information between the RCMP and the CRTC. We have not seen the government act on it.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473268\" data-originallang=\"en\">It is important to note that with this bill there has been a lot of talk about the types of things we can do internationally, as well. One of the things I would point out that I have been very vocal on, because I have had Ukrainian interns in my office for a number of years, is that we could use a lot of our leverage in terms of cybersecurity and training to help them to deal with the Russian hacking and other nefarious international players. That would not only help Ukraine right now in the war with Russia. It would also help with the other activity that comes out of this subsequently, which would help the world economies by having trained, solid professionals who are able to use their expertise and battle this with regard to the current state of affairs and also the future. This would be helpful, not only for the Ukrainian population but also for the European Union, Canada, North America and others, who will continue to battle more complex artificial intelligence and other cyber-attacks that take place.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473269\" data-originallang=\"en\">One of the things I want to note is that in the bill, a proposed new section 15.2 of the act would give the Minister of Industry and the Minister of Public Safety the authority to make several types of orders. It relates to guiding TSPs to stop providing services if necessary. This is a strong power that we are pleased to see in this type of legislation.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473270\" data-originallang=\"en\"> What we are really concerned about, as the member for <a data-HoCid=\"278634\" href=\"/politicians/daniel-blaikie/\" title=\"Daniel Blaikie\">Elmwood\u2014Transcona</a> noted, is that there is no general oversight of the type that we would normally see on other types of legislation. Scrutiny of regulations was the one referred to. For those who are not familiar with the back halls and dark corners of Parliament, there is a committee that I was one of the vice-chairs of at one point in time. The scrutiny of regulations committee oversees all legislation passed in the House of Commons and ensures that the bureaucratic and governmental arms, including that of ministers, whatever political colour they will be of at that time, follow through with the laws of the legislation that is passed. Making this bill not have to go through that type of a process is wrong. I would actually say it is reckless, because the committee has to do a lot of work just to get regulatory things followed on a regular basis. It can be quite a long period, but there is that check and balance that takes place, and it is a joint Senate and House of Commons committee. It is unfortunate that the legislation tries to leave that out.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473271\" data-originallang=\"en\">The legislation also does not have the requirement to gazette information in terms of making it public for the different types of institutions. That is an issue, and it also has a lot of holes when it comes to information that can be withheld and shared.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473272\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Why is that important with regard to confidence in the bill? It all comes down to the fact that many of the institutions at risk of being targeted involve not only the private sector, where we have seen not only abuse of customers themselves, or businesses with lax policies that do not protect privacy very well, but also others that have used abusive techniques and processes. Even right now, it is amazing when we think about the information in the process that is going on in the United States. The U.S. Senate is going to oversee the issue with regard to Taylor Swift tickets and Ticketmaster again. That is another one that has had a nefarious past with regard to privacy, information and how it runs its business. People can go back to look at that one, with Live Nation and so forth. At any rate, the U.S. is also involved in this.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473273\" data-originallang=\"en\">I raised those things because it also comes from the soft things like that, which are very serious with respect to credit cards and to people's personal information that is shared. However, across the world and in Canada we also have municipal infrastructure and government institutions that are constantly under attack. That is very important, because it is not just the external elements with regard to consumer protection and business losses, which are quite significant and into the billions of dollars. It is also everything from water treatment facilities to health care facilities in terms of hospitals and utilities for power and hydro. All those elements can be used as targets to undermine a civilian population as well, and one of the things we would like to see is more accountability when it comes to those elements. There is definitely more to do. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473274\" data-originallang=\"en\">One of the things I do not quite understand, and which I am pleased to see the government at least bring to committee, is what we could do to educate the population.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473275\" data-originallang=\"en\">Our first intervention on this bill as New Democrats was several years ago, and it is sad that it is just coming to fruition now.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7473253\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ai le plaisir de parler aujourd'hui du projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"11862853\" href=\"/bills/44-1/C-26/\" title=\"An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-26</a>, Loi concernant la cybers\u00e9curit\u00e9, modifiant la Loi sur les t\u00e9l\u00e9communications et apportant des modifications corr\u00e9latives \u00e0 d'autres lois. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473254\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il est vraiment important de reconna\u00eetre que nous sommes tr\u00e8s en retard dans le domaine de la cybers\u00e9curit\u00e9. J\u2019ai d\u00e9j\u00e0 fait savoir au gouvernement que j\u2019\u00e9tais tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9occup\u00e9 par le fait que nous n\u2019en faisions pas assez au Canada pour prot\u00e9ger les renseignements personnels num\u00e9riques des Canadiens et j\u2019avais alors demand\u00e9 au gouvernement d'\u00e9laborer des cadres et des lignes directrices plus solides pour am\u00e9liorer la cybers\u00e9curit\u00e9 au Canada. Ce sont des questions cruciales auxquelles il fallait s\u2019attaquer et auxquelles il faut encore s\u2019attaquer dans l'int\u00e9r\u00eat du Canada, car notre \u00e9conomie et notre commerce sont actuellement menac\u00e9s, tout comme notre vie priv\u00e9e.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473255\" data-originallang=\"en\">Quand ai-je demand\u00e9 cela? C'\u00e9tait en 2016. Or, de 2016 \u00e0 aujourd'hui, de nombreux changements num\u00e9riques sont survenus qui font que nous vivons presque dans un autre monde maintenant.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473256\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'ai re\u00e7u une r\u00e9ponse du gouvernement \u00e0 l'\u00e9poque disant essentiellement qu'il allait saisir les tribunaux de la question et attendre la d\u00e9cision.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473257\" data-originallang=\"en\">L'un des cas les plus c\u00e9l\u00e8bres pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 \u00e0 l'\u00e9poque concernait l'Universit\u00e9 de Calgary, qui aurait vers\u00e9 20 000 $ en indemnisation \u00e0 un groupe d'organisations que nous ne connaissons pas, pour rem\u00e9dier \u00e0 l\u2019importante atteinte \u00e0 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 qui les avait frapp\u00e9es.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473258\" data-originallang=\"en\">L\u2019issue de plusieurs cas et l\u2019application de nos lois actuelles ont montr\u00e9 qu'il est acceptable de payer des criminels et de r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 ce type de demandes d'extorsion sans m\u00eame en parler aux personnes dont la vie priv\u00e9e a \u00e9t\u00e9 viol\u00e9e. Nous ne sommes m\u00eame pas oblig\u00e9s d\u2019informer les organismes d\u2019application de la loi qu\u2019un crime a \u00e9t\u00e9 commis. C'est, \u00e0 tout le moins, tr\u00e8s inqui\u00e9tant. Cette loi est certes une mesure utile, mais il reste encore beaucoup \u00e0 faire.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473259\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous, n\u00e9o-d\u00e9mocrates, reconnaissons vraiment la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de trouver un juste \u00e9quilibre dans ce domaine. C'est pourquoi j'avais \u00e9galement \u00e9crit \u00e0 la commissaire \u00e0 la protection de la vie priv\u00e9e du Canada de l\u2019\u00e9poque, Jennifer Stoddart, au sujet des cyberattaques et des atteintes \u00e0 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des donn\u00e9es.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473260\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous sommes pr\u00e9occup\u00e9s par la quantit\u00e9 de donn\u00e9es, les droits et les protections dont les Canadiens devraient b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier et l\u2019information \u00e0 laquelle tout citoyen vivant en d\u00e9mocratie devrait avoir acc\u00e8s. Ce n\u2019est pas d'avancer une th\u00e9orie du complot que d'exprimer ce genre de pr\u00e9occupations.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473261\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je citerai un cas c\u00e9l\u00e8bre. Comme les n\u00e9o-d\u00e9mocrates le savent bien, et je pense que d\u2019autres Canadiens le savent aussi, notre grand champion canadien des soins de sant\u00e9, Tommy Douglas, a \u00e9t\u00e9 lui-m\u00eame espionn\u00e9 par la GRC \u00e0 la m\u00eame \u00e9poque. L\u2019op\u00e9ration \u00e9tait li\u00e9e \u00e0 l\u2019assurance-maladie. L\u2019affaire est tr\u00e8s bien document\u00e9e. Nous n'avons pas encore tous les dossiers. Nous n'avons pas encore toutes les informations, mais l'affaire est tr\u00e8s c\u00e9l\u00e8bre.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473262\" data-originallang=\"en\">La mise en place de notre joyau le plus pr\u00e9cieux, l\u2019assurance-maladie, a conduit \u00e0 l\u2019espionnage par nos propres services d\u2019un repr\u00e9sentant \u00e9lu qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 en fait d\u00e9clar\u00e9 le meilleur Canadien par la population. Il ne faut pas oublier cette affaire parce que, lorsque des projets de loi comme celui-ci sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s, on peut r\u00e9ellement craindre que la capacit\u00e9 de chacun \u00e0 se prot\u00e9ger et \u00e0 prot\u00e9ger sa vie priv\u00e9e s\u2019en trouve affaiblie, et que les grands changements qui surviendront pourraient menacer la protection de la vie priv\u00e9e.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473263\" data-originallang=\"en\">Par la suite, j'ai \u00e9galement \u00e9t\u00e9 tr\u00e8s heureux, en 2020, de pr\u00e9senter une motion au Comit\u00e9 de l'industrie de la Chambre des communes, o\u00f9 nous avons \u00e9tudi\u00e9, pour la premi\u00e8re fois dans l'histoire du Canada, les appels frauduleux au Canada.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473264\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il y a beaucoup de cyberattaques par le biais de ce type de syst\u00e8me d'exploitation, et nous devons nous rappeler que l'utilisation de ce type de syst\u00e8me, offert par nos fournisseurs de services Internet et le secteur des t\u00e9l\u00e9communications, se fait \u00e0 l\u2019ext\u00e9rieur de l'infrastructure publique et d\u2019une r\u00e9glementation de l'industrie.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473265\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous avons construit une b\u00eate, \u00e0 bien des \u00e9gards, qui a un faible degr\u00e9 de responsabilisation, et nous sommes enfin en train de corriger une partie du probl\u00e8me. Il y a aussi de nouveaux programmes qui arrivent, comme STIR/SHAKEN et d'autres types de rapports \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473266\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je tiens \u00e0 souligner que, depuis que nous avons fait cela, nous avons un autre rapport \u00e0 d\u00e9poser, ou du moins une lettre. Nous n'avons pas encore pris de d\u00e9cision; le travail se poursuit. Nous avons eu quelques r\u00e9unions suppl\u00e9mentaires \u00e0 ce sujet au comit\u00e9 de l'industrie et nous avons vraiment entendu de nombreux t\u00e9moignages qui ont montr\u00e9 qu'il y a encore du travail \u00e0 faire.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473267\" data-originallang=\"en\">Un bon exemple provenant du rapport pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent concerne la recommandation num\u00e9ro cinq, qui portait sur le partage de l'information entre la GRC et le CRTC, une recommandation \u00e0 laquelle le gouvernement n\u2019a pas donn\u00e9 suite.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473268\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il est important de noter qu'avec ce projet de loi, nous avons beaucoup parl\u00e9 des mesures que nous pouvons \u00e9galement prendre au niveau international. L'une des choses que je voudrais souligner et sur laquelle j'ai beaucoup insist\u00e9, car j'ai eu des stagiaires ukrainiens dans mon bureau pendant plusieurs ann\u00e9es, c'est que nous pourrions utiliser beaucoup de nos moyens et de nos comp\u00e9tences en cybers\u00e9curit\u00e9 et en formation pour aider les Ukrainiens \u00e0 faire face aux pirates russes et \u00e0 d'autres acteurs \u00e9trangers malfaisants. En plus d\u2019aider l'Ukraine dans sa guerre actuelle contre Russie, cela serait \u00e9galement utile pour les autres activit\u00e9s qui en d\u00e9coulent et serait b\u00e9n\u00e9fique pour les \u00e9conomies mondiales en favorisant l\u2019\u00e9mergence de professionnels form\u00e9s et solides, capables d'utiliser leur expertise et de se battre contre les cyberattaques actuelles et futures. Cela serait utile non seulement pour la population ukrainienne, mais aussi pour l'Union europ\u00e9enne, le Canada, les pays de l'Am\u00e9rique du Nord et d'autres pays, qui continueront \u00e0 lutter contre des types d\u2019intelligence artificielle plus complexes et d'autres cyberattaques qui surviendront.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473269\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je voudrais notamment attirer l'attention de la Chambre sur le nouvel article 15.2 que pr\u00e9voit le projet de loi et qui donnerait au ministre de l'Industrie et au ministre de la S\u00e9curit\u00e9 publique le pouvoir de prendre plusieurs types d'ordonnances. Cela permettrait d\u2019obliger les t\u00e9l\u00e9communicateurs \u00e0 cesser, au besoin, de fournir des services. C'est un pouvoir fort que nous sommes heureux de voir dans ce type de projet de loi.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473270\" data-originallang=\"en\">Ce qui nous pr\u00e9occupe vraiment, comme l'a fait remarquer le d\u00e9put\u00e9 d'<a data-HoCid=\"278634\" href=\"/politicians/daniel-blaikie/\" title=\"Daniel Blaikie\">Elmwood\u2011Transcona</a>, c'est qu'il n'y a pas de m\u00e9canisme g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de surveillance comme on en retrouverait normalement dans d'autres types de projets de loi. On a parl\u00e9 d'un examen minutieux des r\u00e8glements. Pour ceux qui ne sont pas familiers avec les coulisses du Parlement, il existe un comit\u00e9 dont j'ai \u00e9t\u00e9 l'un des vice-pr\u00e9sidents \u00e0 un moment donn\u00e9: le comit\u00e9 d'examen de la r\u00e9glementation. Ce comit\u00e9 supervise toutes les lois adopt\u00e9es par la Chambre des communes et veille \u00e0 ce que les organes bureaucratiques et gouvernementaux, y compris les ministres, quelle que soit leur all\u00e9geance politique \u00e0 ce moment-l\u00e0, donnent suite aux lois adopt\u00e9es. Soustraire le projet de loi \u00e0 ce type de processus est une erreur. Je dirais m\u00eame que c'est imprudent, parce que le comit\u00e9 doit faire beaucoup de travail pour exercer un suivi r\u00e9gulier des r\u00e8glements. L\u2019exercice peut prendre beaucoup de temps, mais il sert de contrepoids, et il rel\u00e8ve conjointement du S\u00e9nat et de la Chambre des communes. C\u2019est malheureux qu\u2019on tente de soustraire le projet de loi \u00e0 cet exercice.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473271\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le projet de loi ne pr\u00e9voit pas non plus l'obligation de publier l'information dans la Gazette de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 la rendre publique pour les diff\u00e9rents organismes. C'est un probl\u00e8me, et il y a aussi beaucoup de lacunes en ce qui concerne les renseignements qui peuvent \u00eatre retenus et partag\u00e9s.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473272\" data-originallang=\"en\">Pourquoi est-ce important pour la confiance dans le projet de loi? C\u2019est d\u2019abord et avant tout parce que les organisations qui risquent d'\u00eatre prises pour cible ne sont pas issues du secteur priv\u00e9, o\u00f9 des clients subissent des abus et o\u00f9 des entreprises ont les politiques laxistes qui ne prot\u00e8gent pas tr\u00e8s bien les renseignements personnels. Beaucoup d'organisations qui n'appartiennent pas au secteur priv\u00e9 ont utilis\u00e9 des techniques et des processus abusifs. M\u00eame \u00e0 l'heure actuelle, il est \u00e9tonnant de songer que des renseignements sont transmis et trait\u00e9s aux \u00c9tats-Unis. Le S\u00e9nat am\u00e9ricain va de nouveau se pencher sur la question des billets de Taylor Swift et de Ticketmaster. Voil\u00e0 une autre soci\u00e9t\u00e9 qui a une mauvaise r\u00e9putation pour la protection des renseignements personnels, la gestion de l\u2019information et l\u2019administration de ses affaires. Les gens peuvent revenir en arri\u00e8re et se tourner vers Live Nation et ainsi de suite. Quoi qu'il en soit, les \u00c9tats-Unis sont \u00e9galement en cause dans cette affaire.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473273\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'ai soulev\u00e9 ces questions parce qu'il y a des probl\u00e8mes l\u00e9gers comme ceux-l\u00e0, mais qui deviennent tr\u00e8s s\u00e9rieux en ce qui concerne les cartes de cr\u00e9dit et les renseignements personnels des gens qui sont partag\u00e9s. Cependant, partout dans le monde et au Canada, nous avons aussi des infrastructures municipales et des organismes gouvernementaux qui sont constamment attaqu\u00e9s. C'est tr\u00e8s important, parce qu\u2019il n\u2019y a pas seulement la protection des consommateurs et les pertes commerciales, qui sont tr\u00e8s importantes et se chiffrent en milliards de dollars, dont il faut tenir compte, il y a aussi tout le r\u00e9seau public, allant des installations de traitement de l'eau aux \u00e9tablissements de soins de sant\u00e9, dont les h\u00f4pitaux, et aux services publics d'\u00e9lectricit\u00e9 et d'hydro\u00e9lectricit\u00e9. Tous ces services peuvent servir de cibles pour porter atteinte \u00e0 une population \u00e9galement, et nous aimerions donc voir une plus grande responsabilisation \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard. Il y a certainement plus \u00e0 faire.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473274\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je suis heureux que le gouvernement ait demand\u00e9 au comit\u00e9 de r\u00e9fl\u00e9chir aux mesures \u00e0 prendre pour sensibiliser la population. Je ne comprends pas tr\u00e8s bien la d\u00e9marche du gouvernement, mais il a au moins soumis la question au comit\u00e9.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7473275\" data-originallang=\"en\">Les n\u00e9o-d\u00e9mocrates sont intervenus la premi\u00e8re fois pour ce projet de loi il y a plusieurs ann\u00e9es, et c\u2019est triste de constater que la disposition l\u00e9gislative ne se concr\u00e9tise que maintenant.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2022/12/1/brian-masse-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/brian-masse/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/3653/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11967566",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Telecommunications Act",
"fr": "La Loi sur les t\u00e9l\u00e9communications"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2022/12/1/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2022%2F12%2F1%2F"
}
}