This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2022-11-22 16:15:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Don Davies (Vancouver Kingsway, NDP)",
"fr": "M. Don Davies (Vancouver Kingsway, NPD)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7440959\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, of course the NDP thinks it is a good idea, as I do, that this bill pass. The CBSA is the only major law enforcement agency in Canada without an independent review mechanism to oversee the bulk of its activity. That is an oversight that needs to be changed.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7440960\" data-originallang=\"en\">I was interested in my friend's comments about interdiction at the borders, and I have done a bit of research. The port of Vancouver alone, with its four terminals, has 1.5 million containers coming every year. CBSA examines only 50,000 of them. That is about 4%. That means 1,450,000 containers pass through just that one port every year that are not examined by CBSA. The average container ship carries 10,000 containers. If 4% are examined, that means some 9,600 containers per ship are not searched.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7440961\" data-originallang=\"en\">Therefore, I am just wondering about the member's party's promotion of interdiction as a preferred method of dealing with guns or drugs. Would he not agree with us that there is just no way the CBSA is ever going to have an effective interdiction policy with figures like those?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7440959\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, bien entendu, le NPD pense, comme moi, que c'est une bonne id\u00e9e d'adopter ce projet de loi. L'Agence des services frontaliers du Canada est le seul organisme d'application de la loi d'importance au pays qui ne dispose pas d'un m\u00e9canisme d'examen ind\u00e9pendant portant sur la majeure partie de ses activit\u00e9s. Il s'agit d'une omission qui doit \u00eatre corrig\u00e9e.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7440960\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'ai trouv\u00e9 int\u00e9ressants les propos de mon ami sur l'interdiction aux fronti\u00e8res, et j'ai fait quelques recherches. \u00c0 lui seul, le port de Vancouver, dot\u00e9 de quatre terminaux, voit arriver 1,5 million de conteneurs chaque ann\u00e9e. L'ASFC n'en inspecte que 50 000, soit environ 4 %. Cela signifie que 1 450 000 conteneurs transitent par ce port chaque ann\u00e9e et ne sont pas inspect\u00e9s par l'ASFC. Un porte-conteneurs a une capacit\u00e9 moyenne de 10 000 conteneurs. Si l'ASFC en inspecte seulement 4 %, cela signifie qu'environ 9 600 conteneurs par navire ne sont pas inspect\u00e9s.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7440961\" data-originallang=\"en\">Par cons\u00e9quent, je suis en droit de m'interroger sur le fait que le parti auquel le d\u00e9put\u00e9 appartient pr\u00e9conise l'interdiction des armes \u00e0 feu et des drogues pour en emp\u00eacher l'entr\u00e9e au Canada. \u00c0 la lumi\u00e8re de ces chiffres, ne convient-il pas que l'ASFC n'a tout simplement pas les moyens d'appliquer efficacement une politique d'interdiction?</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2022/11/22/don-davies-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/don-davies/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1007/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11938492",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Public Complaints and Review Commission Act",
"fr": "Loi sur la Commission d'examen et de traitement des plaintes du public"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2022/11/22/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2022%2F11%2F22%2F"
}
}