This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2022-10-28 12:50:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Ruby Sahota (Brampton North, Lib.)",
"fr": "Mme Ruby Sahota (Brampton-Nord, Lib.)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7374677\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, it is a privilege to rise on Bill <a data-HoCid=\"11474441\" href=\"/bills/44-1/S-207/\" title=\"An Act to change the name of the electoral district of Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle\">S-207</a> today. For my colleague from <a data-HoCid=\"278802\" href=\"/politicians/brenda-shanahan/\" title=\"Brenda Shanahan\">Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle</a>, it is a name that has defined her in the House for some time now. However, the concern of this bill is that the name does not correctly identify the riding and the people whom she represents. This is an injustice for any member of Parliament or any representative for there not to be a clear correlation as to who her people are and whom she represents.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374678\" data-originallang=\"en\">I know it was mentioned by the previous speaker in the House that this bill is unnecessary, but that is in the eye of the beholder. It is up to the constituents of Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle and to the member who is sponsoring this bill as to whether something is necessary. The Senate has looked at the bill and found that there is legitimacy to having this name change, and there absolutely is.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374679\" data-originallang=\"en\"> There is not much to say on this bill. People can merely look at the map and they will see clearly that Lacolle is not situated in this riding. However, Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle is situated in the riding. How insulting is it to constituents when they hear themselves being represented by a particular name? It further emphasizes that \u201cOttawa knows best\u201d approach. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374680\" data-originallang=\"en\">The commissioner up here decided in the last redistribution that this was going to be the name. At that time, the NDP member who was the representative of that riding did not contest the name, and I do not know why. There could have been many reasons for that, and maybe we will not really know why that member did not take a keen interest in making sure that their voters were identified properly and knew who their member of Parliament was.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374681\" data-originallang=\"en\">That brings us to this point, and we have been at this point several times. This bill has unfortunately had to go through this process several times and has not made it to the end. We have heard debate in the House as to why this change is necessary and important, and we have heard debate regarding this name change in the other place as well.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374682\" data-originallang=\"en\">The previous speaker said that it is futile and unnecessary at this point because, once again, we are at that 10-year mark when redistribution is happening again and there are further name changes happening. I argue that, if it were not for the member who is the sponsor of this bill, that would have never happened. It is because of the work that has been done through this private member's bill that the commission has become alerted to the fact that this is very important and we should take names very seriously.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374683\" data-originallang=\"en\">I can point to some examples in the redistribution process that are happening today as well for Ontario. The name of my riding of Brampton North is completely being switched and changed to another name, just when the constituents were getting used to the fact that these are our boundaries and this is the name we go by. I would say that the previous redistribution commission did a good job at simplifying the names and making it clearly understandable as to where the voters lived and who represented them. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374684\" data-originallang=\"en\">However, in this redistribution the names are being completely switched. It is unfair to constantly be confusing voters as to whom they need to be going to in a time of need, and that is what we are there for. Often times, when we are not in the House, we are in our constituencies attending to people's worries and concerns, which are often emergency situations. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374685\" data-originallang=\"en\">For my riding, there is often lots of confusion. After the last redistribution, there was immense confusion as to where things stood and whom they needed to go to. They recalled whom they voted for last time and felt that they should be coming to me because my predecessor was the one I had defeated, so it just made natural sense. Therefore, having a name that helps constituents imagine what their boundaries may be if they are not in possession of an actual map is important.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374686\" data-originallang=\"en\">Currently, like I said, my riding is Brampton North. In this redistribution process, Brampton East is being renamed Brampton North. Brampton East no longer exists and Brampton North is now Brampton East. Brampton North is going to be different, Brampton\u2014Chinguacousy, apparently. This is quite confusing. I know I, my other Brampton colleagues and other presenters at the commission have made the argument that, if a new district is being added, a new constituency, there is no need to change around all of the previously existing names. A new name should just be created for the new riding.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374687\" data-originallang=\"en\">I can really relate to my colleague on the need for the name change. I understand why it is so important for her and her constituents to be granted this change. I think it is their right to be identified properly and for it to be acknowledged that they are important within Canada. It is important that we know who they are and what their concerns are, and that they know who to go to when they need change. This would help clear up a lot of confusion. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374688\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would ask that the members in the House support the bill, regardless of what their personal feelings may be, and regardless of whether they feel there could be a matter that is more important to them that could have been raised. I know I have heard comments like that made. However, this is really important to the voters of <a data-HoCid=\"278802\" href=\"/politicians/brenda-shanahan/\" title=\"Brenda Shanahan\">Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle</a>. The new name for the riding is Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Les Jardins-de-Napierville. I believe this is what the constituents want. This is what the voters want. This is what the House should agree to grant them.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374689\" data-originallang=\"en\">The residents of Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle, among others, communicated these concerns. They communicated them before the commission last time. They communicated them again this time. It just happens to be that with private member's bills this process can be tedious and can take some time. Members do not get to choose the timing. I know a lot of constituents who may be watching at home do not recognize what system we have in Parliament in order for a member to bring forward a private member's bill, but I think it is important for them to know.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374690\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Oftentimes I have constituents who come up and ask why I do not bring something forward or say that it would be great if I had a bill passed under my name that helped the community in some way or another, or they ask why a member got to do something or why they seemed to be working harder than I was on a matter. It is important for constituents to know that it is really hard to get a private member's bill. We have a lottery system that comes up every Parliament. After every election, there is a new lottery system. There is no preference given to any members as whether it is something they have been trying to do for many Parliaments and have not been able to accomplish or whether it is a new idea. We have had new members who have spent a few weeks in Parliament who have had to get up and figure out what private member's bill to bring forward.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374691\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would say this colleague of mine has spent a long time, over two Parliaments, trying to get this to the finish line. We respect that. She was able to use her name drawn in the first lottery system for private member's bills. She was also able to use the work she was able to do with the Senate to get the Senate to recognize the bill and bring it to the House. I think we should recognize all the hard work that she has done to almost get this to the finish line. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374692\" data-originallang=\"en\">All of us in this House should support this piece of the legislation and let the voters have what they would like. Let them be represented by who they feel they are. That is really important. I do not think any of us would like to be called something we are not. I would definitely not want to be the member for Mississauga if I was representing Brampton. We should all understand that feeling.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7374677\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ai le privil\u00e8ge de pouvoir prendre la parole aujourd'hui \u00e0 propos du projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"11474441\" href=\"/bills/44-1/S-207/\" title=\"An Act to change the name of the electoral district of Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle\">S-207</a>. Le nom de la circonscription de <a data-HoCid=\"278802\" href=\"/politicians/brenda-shanahan/\" title=\"Brenda Shanahan\">Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle</a> sert \u00e0 identifier la d\u00e9put\u00e9e qui la repr\u00e9sente depuis un certain temps. Toutefois, le projet de loi qui nous est soumis vise \u00e0 changer ce nom parce que celui-ci d\u00e9crit mal le territoire et la population de la circonscription. Une telle discordance est injuste pour la d\u00e9put\u00e9e parce que le nom caract\u00e9rise mal les gens qu'elle repr\u00e9sente.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374678\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je sais que, selon le d\u00e9put\u00e9 qui est intervenu avant moi, ce projet de loi est inutile, mais son point de vue est celui d'un observateur ext\u00e9rieur. Il revient plut\u00f4t aux gens de Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle et au parrain du projet de loi de d\u00e9cider de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 du projet de loi. Le S\u00e9nat l'a examin\u00e9 et a constat\u00e9 qu'il \u00e9tait l\u00e9gitime de vouloir changer le nom de la circonscription. Je suis tout \u00e0 fait d'accord.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374679\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Il n'y a pas grand-chose \u00e0 dire sur ce projet de loi. Il suffit de regarder la carte pour constater que Lacolle n'est pas situ\u00e9e dans cette circonscription. Cependant, Saint\u2011Bernard\u2011de\u2011Lacolle l'est. \u00c0 quel point est-il insultant pour les citoyens de voir leur circonscription d\u00e9sign\u00e9e par un certain nom? C'est un bel exemple de l'approche paternaliste selon laquelle Ottawa a toujours raison.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374680\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Les commissaires ont d\u00e9cid\u00e9 au dernier red\u00e9coupage que cette circonscription porterait ce nom. \u00c0 l'\u00e9poque, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 n\u00e9o-d\u00e9mocrate qui repr\u00e9sentait la circonscription n'a pas contest\u00e9 le nom. J'ignore pourquoi. Il existe peut-\u00eatre bien des raisons. Nous ne saurons peut-\u00eatre jamais v\u00e9ritablement pourquoi ce d\u00e9put\u00e9 n'a pas manifest\u00e9 grand int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 ce que la r\u00e9gion qu'il repr\u00e9sentait soit d\u00e9sign\u00e9e ad\u00e9quatement et que les gens de cette r\u00e9gion sachent qui \u00e9tait leur d\u00e9put\u00e9.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374681\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cela nous m\u00e8ne l\u00e0 o\u00f9 nous en sommes aujourd'hui. Ce n'est pas la premi\u00e8re fois que nous \u00e9tudions ce projet de loi. Il a malheureusement d\u00fb recommencer les \u00e9tapes du processus plusieurs fois, car il n'est jamais parvenu au fil d'arriv\u00e9e. La Chambre et le S\u00e9nat ont tous deux d\u00e9battu, d\u00e9j\u00e0, de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 et de l'importance de ce changement.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374682\" data-originallang=\"en\">La d\u00e9put\u00e9e qui a pris la parole avant moi a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 que c'\u00e9tait futile et inutile \u00e0 ce stade-ci, car nous proc\u00e9dons actuellement au red\u00e9coupage des circonscriptions \u00e9lectorales, comme cela se fait tous les dix ans, et que d'autres changements de noms sont pr\u00e9vus. Je maintiens que si la d\u00e9put\u00e9e qui parraine le projet de loi n'avait pas soulev\u00e9 le probl\u00e8me, rien n'aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 fait. C'est gr\u00e2ce au travail qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 fait dans le cadre de ce projet de loi d'initiative parlementaire que la Commission a \u00e9t\u00e9 sensibilis\u00e9e \u00e0 l'importance de ce dossier et au fait que nous devons prendre les noms de circonscriptions tr\u00e8s au s\u00e9rieux.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374683\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je peux vous donner quelques exemples du processus de red\u00e9coupage en cours en Ontario. Le nom de ma circonscription, Brampton-Nord, est sur le point d'\u00eatre enti\u00e8rement modifi\u00e9, alors que mes concitoyens commencent tout juste \u00e0 s'habituer aux limites et au nom de la circonscription. Je dirais que la pr\u00e9c\u00e9dente Commission de d\u00e9limitation des circonscriptions \u00e9lectorales a bien fait de simplifier les noms et de les rendre repr\u00e9sentatifs de l'endroit o\u00f9 vivent les \u00e9lecteurs et de la personne qui les repr\u00e9sente.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374684\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cependant, dans ce red\u00e9coupage, les noms sont compl\u00e8tement intervertis. Il est injuste de confondre constamment les \u00e9lecteurs quant \u00e0 la personne \u00e0 qui ils doivent s'adresser en cas de besoin, ce pour quoi nous sommes l\u00e0. Souvent, lorsque nous ne si\u00e9geons pas \u00e0 la Chambre, nous allons dans nos circonscriptions pour r\u00e9pondre aux dol\u00e9ances et aux pr\u00e9occupations des gens, qui sont souvent urgentes. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374685\" data-originallang=\"en\">Dans ma circonscription, il y a souvent beaucoup de confusion. Apr\u00e8s le dernier red\u00e9coupage, il y avait une immense confusion quant \u00e0 la position de chacun et \u00e0 qui les gens devaient s'adresser. Ils se sont souvenus pour qui ils avaient vot\u00e9 aux derni\u00e8res \u00e9lections et ont estim\u00e9 qu'ils devaient s'adresser \u00e0 moi, car mon pr\u00e9d\u00e9cesseur \u00e9tait celui que j'avais battu. C'\u00e9tait donc tout naturel. C'est pourquoi il est important d'avoir un nom qui aide les \u00e9lecteurs \u00e0 imaginer ce que peuvent \u00eatre les fronti\u00e8res s'ils n'ont pas en mains une carte r\u00e9elle.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374686\" data-originallang=\"en\">Actuellement, comme je l'ai dit, ma circonscription s'appelle Brampton\u2011Nord. Dans le cadre de ce processus de red\u00e9coupage, Brampton-Est sera rebaptis\u00e9e Brampton\u2011Nord. Brampton\u2011Est n'existera plus, et Brampton-Nord correspondra \u00e0 l'actuelle Brampton-Est. Il semble que l'actuelle Brampton\u2011Nord portera pour sa part un nom diff\u00e9rent, Brampton\u2014Chinguacousy. Il y a de quoi y perdre son latin. Je sais que mes autres coll\u00e8gues de Brampton, d'autres intervenants \u00e0 la commission et moi avons fait valoir que, si l'on ajoute un nouveau district, une nouvelle circonscription, il n'est pas n\u00e9cessaire d'intervertir tous les noms existants. Il suffit de donner un nouveau nom \u00e0 la nouvelle circonscription.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374687\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je comprends tr\u00e8s bien ma coll\u00e8gue en ce qui concerne la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 du changement de nom. Je comprends pourquoi il est si important pour elle et son \u00e9lectorat de se voir accorder ce changement. Je pense qu'ils ont le droit d'\u00eatre identifi\u00e9s correctement et que l'on reconnaisse qu'ils sont importants au sein du Canada. Il est important que nous sachions qui ils sont et quelles sont leurs pr\u00e9occupations, et qu'eux sachent \u00e0 qui s'adresser lorsque des changements sont n\u00e9cessaires. Cela permettrait de dissiper beaucoup de confusion. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374688\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je demande aux d\u00e9put\u00e9s d'appuyer ce projet de loi, peu importe leur opinion et peu importe s'ils jugent qu'on aurait pu discuter d'un sujet plus important. J'ai en effet entendu des commentaires en ce sens. Il s'agit toutefois d'un sujet tr\u00e8s important pour les habitants de <a data-HoCid=\"278802\" href=\"/politicians/brenda-shanahan/\" title=\"Brenda Shanahan\">Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle</a>. Le nouveau nom de cette circonscription deviendrait Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Les Jardins-de-Napierville. Je crois que c'est ce que les habitants souhaitent. C'est ce que les \u00e9lecteurs souhaitent. C\u2019est pourquoi la Chambre devrait acc\u00e9der \u00e0 leur demande. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374689\" data-originallang=\"en\">Les habitants de Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle, entre autres, ont d\u00e9j\u00e0 soulev\u00e9 ces pr\u00e9occupations. Ils l'ont fait devant la commission la derni\u00e8re fois. Ils l'ont fait \u00e0 nouveau cette fois-ci. Le probl\u00e8me, dans le cas des projets de loi d'initiative parlementaire, c'est que le processus peut \u00eatre long et fastidieux. Les d\u00e9put\u00e9s ne peuvent choisir \u00e0 quel moment on d\u00e9battra de leur projet de loi. Je sais que bien des gens qui nous regardent \u00e0 la maison ne connaissent pas la proc\u00e9dure associ\u00e9e \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sentation d'un projet de loi d'initiative parlementaire, et je crois qu'il est important qu'on la leur explique. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374690\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il arrive souvent que des habitants de ma circonscription me demandent pourquoi je ne pr\u00e9sente pas des mesures, en pr\u00e9cisant que ce serait g\u00e9nial si je pr\u00e9sentais un projet de loi en mon nom pour le faire adopter afin d'aider ma communaut\u00e9 d'une quelconque fa\u00e7on. Parfois, ils veulent savoir pourquoi un tel d\u00e9put\u00e9 a pu faire progresser son dossier, ce qui donne l'impression qu'il travaille plus fort que moi. Il est important que les Canadiens sachent qu'il est tr\u00e8s difficile de pr\u00e9senter un projet de loi d'initiative parlementaire, et ce, en raison du tirage au sort effectu\u00e9 \u00e0 chaque l\u00e9gislature. Apr\u00e8s chaque \u00e9lection g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, on proc\u00e8de \u00e0 un nouveau tirage au sort. Il n'y a aucune pr\u00e9f\u00e9rence, tous les d\u00e9put\u00e9s sont sur le m\u00eame pied d'\u00e9galit\u00e9, peu importe s'ils tentent de faire progresser leur projet de loi depuis de nombreuses l\u00e9gislatures ou s'il s'agit d'une toute nouvelle id\u00e9e. On a m\u00eame d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu des nouveaux d\u00e9put\u00e9s, arriv\u00e9s au Parlement depuis quelques semaines seulement, \u00eatre choisis et se d\u00e9p\u00eacher \u00e0 pondre un projet de loi \u00e0 pr\u00e9senter \u00e0 la Chambre.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374691\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je dirais que ma coll\u00e8gue a pass\u00e9 beaucoup de temps \u2014 plus de deux l\u00e9gislatures \u2014 \u00e0 essayer de faire franchir la ligne d'arriv\u00e9e au projet de loi. Cela, nous le respectons. Elle a pu profiter du fait que son nom a \u00e9t\u00e9 pig\u00e9 lors du premier tirage pour qu'on d\u00e9batte de son projet de loi. Elle a pu profiter de son travail aupr\u00e8s du S\u00e9nat pour convaincre celui-ci \u00e0 reconna\u00eetre le projet de loi afin qu'elle puisse le pr\u00e9senter \u00e0 la Chambre. Je pense que nous devrions souligner tout l'excellent travail qu'elle a accompli pour faire progresser le projet de loi jusqu'\u00e0 cette derni\u00e8re \u00e9tape du processus l\u00e9gislatif.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7374692\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous devrions tous appuyer ce projet de loi et permettre aux \u00e9lecteurs d'obtenir ce qu'ils d\u00e9sirent. Laissons-les choisir une d\u00e9signation repr\u00e9sentative de leur identit\u00e9. C'est tr\u00e8s important. Je ne pense pas que quiconque aime \u00eatre appel\u00e9 quelque chose qu'il n'est pas. Je ne voudrais certainement pas \u00eatre appel\u00e9e la d\u00e9put\u00e9e de Mississauga si je repr\u00e9sente Brampton. Nous devrions tous comprendre ce sentiment.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2022/10/28/ruby-sahota-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/ruby-sahota/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4209/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11890381",
"h1": {
"en": "Private Members' Business",
"fr": "Affaires \u00e9manant des d\u00e9put\u00e9s"
},
"h2": {
"en": "An Act to Change the Name of the Electoral District of Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle",
"fr": "Loi visant \u00e0 modifier le nom de la circonscription \u00e9lectorale de Ch\u00e2teauguay\u2014Lacolle"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2022/10/28/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2022%2F10%2F28%2F"
}
}