Speech (House debate)

{
    "time": "2021-06-22 00:00:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Kerry Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach, CPC)",
        "fr": "M. Kerry Diotte (Edmonton Griesbach, PCC)"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6821661\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Mr. Speaker, Toronto's CN Tower is a Canadian landmark that is known worldwide. When it was completed in 1976, it was the highest free-standing structure in the world. It is 553 metres tall, or about 1,800 old-fashioned feet high. That is the length of five and a half football fields. It has actually been named a wonder of the modern world, right up there with the Golden Gate Bridge and the Empire State Building. The CN Tower gets a lot of attention, and tons of people visit it: two million a year.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821662\" data-originallang=\"en\">Some of those visitors got more than they bargained for on July 16, 2001. On that day, two radical activists decided to do a dangerous illegal stunt. The two men scaled the outside of the tower and unfurled a banner. That banner bashed the Liberal government and the U.S. government for allegedly being killers of the planet. Not doing enough to fight climate change was the charge. The men had to be rescued by firefighters, and they were later charged and convicted for their dangerous stunt. The court heard that the whole ordeal cost CN $50,000, but the two men only had to pay $3,000 in fines in total. I guess the punishment did not quite fit the crime.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821663\" data-originallang=\"en\">Who were those two men who created such havoc and made headlines worldwide? They were both Greenpeace activists. One was a British guy, Chris Holden. The other fella has really climbed to new heights. He is now a Liberal cabinet minister, the <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">heritage minister</a>. Two decades after his last dangerous stunt, this radical guy is pulling another one. In some ways, it is even more dangerous than his first stunt. He wants to censor our online free speech.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821664\" data-originallang=\"en\">By now many Canadians have heard of Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>. It is actually interesting that hundreds of bills are discussed in the House and most people do not pay attention. If we mentioned a random bill, the average Canadian likely would not know what it is about and probably would not care. We realize that a bill is controversial when regular folks know about it and know it by name and number. I did a virtual meeting with students from a grade 6 class a couple of weeks back and they knew about Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>. They were very concerned about it. They should be.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821665\" data-originallang=\"en\">I have a special interest myself in Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>. I worked as a journalist for three decades in radio, TV, newspapers and news magazines, so free speech is in my DNA. For many years I was an opinion columnist for the Toronto Sun chain. Opinion columnists at Sun Media were the lifeblood of that organization. Every survey we did showed that many people bought the newspapers, and sometimes just to read one of the regular columnists.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821666\" data-originallang=\"en\">I am not going to bore anybody by dissecting the intricate legalese of Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>. Lots of lawyers and legal experts have argued the finer points in detail. I know the government will tout this bill as being all about supporting Canadian content. It has already done that. It claims it is not out to stop free speech in any real way, but I do not believe it. Most Canadians do not either. It is no wonder that we do not believe it. The government has earned a reputation, and it is not a good reputation. It cannot be trusted. I do not trust it and Canadians do not trust it.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821667\" data-originallang=\"en\">The <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> and his Liberals have a long string of botched files, ethics violations, broken promises and cover-ups. They failed to quickly close our borders when COVID hit. Then they failed on quickly getting Canadians vaccines. They tried to do a deal with the communist Chinese regime to get vaccines. Of course that failed miserably.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821668\" data-originallang=\"en\">The Liberals have failed on many, many fronts: the SNC-Lavalin affair, the WE scandal, cash for access, cancelled energy projects, disgraced cabinet ministers and MPs, blackface, the trip to the Aga Khan's private island, no serious plan to open our international border and cover-ups galore. Let us consider a recent one. It is about the Winnipeg National Microbiology Lab and a refusal to provide vital documents to a key parliamentary committee. Look for that to be in the headlines for a long time.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821669\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Is it any wonder that Canadians do not trust the Liberals? Is it any wonder they cannot be trusted with something so sacred as free speech? Is it any wonder that people do not trust the <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">minister</a> proposing Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>, a guy with a radical past, a guy who got hauled off in handcuffs and was convicted by a court of law?</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821670\" data-originallang=\"en\">We have already seen censorship raise its ugly head on the Internet. It is already happening at an alarming rate. I bet every Canadian with a computer knows someone who has had a social media post flagged or deleted by big tech. It could have been for something as simple as a personal opinion about COVID rules. I bet many of us know people whose social media accounts have been suspended or even shut down by big tech. It is ridiculous that some self-appointed 20-something is a judge at a big tech firm like Twitter, Facebook or YouTube.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821671\" data-originallang=\"en\">It also seems like conservative voices are the ones often targeted by these censors. It is strange how that works. Can members imagine what kind of censorship will happen if the Liberal government controls our online speech? I shudder to think of it. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821672\" data-originallang=\"en\">Some people might say that since I am a member of the official opposition, of course I will slam any Liberal bill. Well, it is not just the official opposition. There are a lot of people against this Big Brother bill. Every constituent I talk to wants me to fight against the bill. I cannot recall one person coming to me to say, \u201cHey, Kerry, you have to support Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>.\u201d In fact, I have heard so much opposition to the bill that I decided to start an online petition against it. I was inundated with people signing it. I told them that I would send a letter of protest directly to the <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">Prime Minister</a> on their behalf, and that is exactly what I did. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821673\" data-originallang=\"en\">Speaking of opposition to Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>, members should check out what Tim Denton said. He is a former national CRTC commissioner, and he is also the current chair of the Internet Society Canada Chapter. Mr. Denton had this to say:</p>\n<blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"6821674\" data-originallang=\"en\"> C-10 is clearly intended to allow speech control at the government\u2019s discretion. Ignore the turn signals, look at where the wheels are pointed. They are pointed at your right to communicate freely by means of the internet. </p>\n</blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"6821675\" data-originallang=\"en\">This is scary stuff. Who would members trust to pass judgment on this bill, our <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">heritage minister</a>, with his radical past, or Mr. Denton? I know who I would trust.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821676\" data-originallang=\"en\">How about the comment from Peter Menzies? He is a long-time journalist and former CRTC vice-chair. I worked in journalism with Peter. He is a good guy, a smart guy. He has summed up the Liberal bill really well. He said that Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a> \u201cwill place the internet under the control of the...CRTC. Its nine unelected, unaccountable commissioners will decide if your Facebook post or YouTube video is appropriate internet content.\u201d My former colleague goes on to point out that the <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">heritage minister</a> \u201chas promised more legislation to establish another regulatory panel to oversee what sort of things people may say on social media. All of this constitutes an outrageous abuse of government authority.\u201d</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821677\" data-originallang=\"en\">We can see where this legislation could go. Maybe a person does not like a government program or a policy or a politician and speaks out. Maybe they will get blocked or cancelled. There is a lot of cancel culture out there to go around, and the legislation before us would only make things worse.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821678\" data-originallang=\"en\">The bottom line is that the Liberal government cannot be trusted with our free speech. The <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">minister</a>, with his radical, checkered past, cannot be trusted with our free speech. Our free speech is too sacred to be imperiled by this terrible, dangerous legislation. Canadians are saying that loud and clear. Bill <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a> must be defeated. Our very democracy in Canada is at stake.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6821661\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, la Tour CN de Toronto est un haut lieu d'int\u00e9r\u00eat reconnu dans le monde entier. \u00c0 la fin de sa construction en 1976, elle \u00e9tait la structure autoportante la plus haute du monde. Sa hauteur est de 553 m\u00e8tres, ou d'environ 1 800 pieds. Cette distance \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 cinq terrains de football et demi. On l'a class\u00e9e parmi les merveilles du monde moderne, au m\u00eame titre que le pont Golden Gate et l'Empire State Building. La Tour CN attire beaucoup l'attention et des tas de gens la visitent, au rythme de 2 millions par ann\u00e9e.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821662\" data-originallang=\"en\">Certains visiteurs en ont eu plus que pour leur argent le 16 juillet 2001. Ce jour-l\u00e0, deux militants radicaux ont d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de faire une cascade ill\u00e9gale. Les deux hommes ont escalad\u00e9 la tour pour y d\u00e9ployer une banderole d\u00e9nigrant le gouvernement lib\u00e9ral et le gouvernement am\u00e9ricain en les taxant de tuer la plan\u00e8te. En fait, on les accusait de ne pas en faire suffisamment pour lutter contre les changements climatiques. Ces hommes ont d\u00fb \u00eatre secourus par les pompiers et ils ont par la suite \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9s coupables pour leur cascade. Au tribunal, on a affirm\u00e9 que cette contrari\u00e9t\u00e9 avait co\u00fbt\u00e9 50 000 $ au CN, mais les deux hommes n'ont pay\u00e9 que 3 000 $ d'amendes au total. Je suppose que la peine n'\u00e9tait pas proportionnelle au crime.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821663\" data-originallang=\"en\">Qui \u00e9taient ces deux hommes qui avaient sem\u00e9 cette pagaille et fait les gros titres dans le monde entier? Tous les deux \u00e9taient des militants de Greenpeace. L'un \u00e9tait un Britannique appel\u00e9 Chris Holden. L\u2019autre a vraiment atteint de nouveaux sommets. Il est maintenant ministre lib\u00e9ral: c\u2019est le <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">ministre du Patrimoine canadien</a>. Vingt ans apr\u00e8s ce dangereux coup d'\u00e9clat, cet extr\u00e9miste repousse une fois de plus les limites. D\u2019une certaine mani\u00e8re, sa deuxi\u00e8me acrobatie est encore plus dangereuse que la premi\u00e8re. Il veut censurer notre libert\u00e9 d\u2019expression en ligne.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821664\" data-originallang=\"en\">\u00c0 l\u2019heure qu\u2019il est, de nombreux Canadiens ont entendu parler du projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>. Il est int\u00e9ressant de voir que parmi les centaines de projets de loi qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 discut\u00e9s \u00e0 la Chambre, la plupart restent inconnus du grand public, par d\u00e9sint\u00e9r\u00eat. Si je mentionne un projet de loi au hasard, M. et Mme Tout-le-Monde ne sauront pas de quoi il traite et ne s\u2019en soucieront pas. Nous comprenons qu\u2019un projet de loi est controvers\u00e9 lorsque les gens ordinaires le connaissent, y compris son nom et son num\u00e9ro. J\u2019ai eu une rencontre \u00e0 distance avec des \u00e9l\u00e8ves de sixi\u00e8me ann\u00e9e il y a quelques semaines et ils connaissaient le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>. Ils se sont dits tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9occup\u00e9s par cette question, et en effet, ils devraient l\u2019\u00eatre.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821665\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je porte moi-m\u00eame un int\u00e9r\u00eat particulier au projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C\u201110</a>. J'ai \u00e9t\u00e9 pendant trois d\u00e9cennies journaliste \u00e0 la radio et \u00e0 la t\u00e9l\u00e9vision, de m\u00eame que pour des journaux et des magazines d'actualit\u00e9. La libre expression fait donc partie de mon ADN. Pendant de nombreuses ann\u00e9es, j'ai r\u00e9dig\u00e9 des articles d'opinion pour la suite de publications du <em>Toronto Sun</em>. Les \u00e9ditorialistes \u00e9taient l'\u00e9l\u00e9ment vital de Sun Media. Chaque sondage que nous r\u00e9alisions r\u00e9v\u00e9lait que beaucoup de gens achetaient le journal, ne serait-ce, parfois, que pour lire les articles des \u00e9ditorialistes.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821666\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je n'ennuierai personne en d\u00e9cortiquant le jargon juridique complexe du projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C\u201110</a>. Bien des avocats et bien des juristes en ont d\u00e9battu les subtilit\u00e9s en d\u00e9tail. Je sais que le gouvernement vantera ce projet de loi en disant qu'il soutient le contenu canadien. Il le fait d\u00e9j\u00e0. Il pr\u00e9tend n'avoir aucune intention de porter atteinte \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 d'expression, mais je ne le crois pas. La plupart des Canadiens non plus. Cela n'a rien d'\u00e9tonnant. Le gouvernement a acquis une certaine r\u00e9putation, et elle est peu reluisante. On ne peut pas lui faire confiance. Je ne lui fais pas confiance et les Canadiens non plus.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821667\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> et les lib\u00e9raux ont une longue s\u00e9rie de dossiers b\u00e2cl\u00e9s, de manquements aux r\u00e8gles d'\u00e9thique, de promesses non tenues et de man\u0153uvres de camouflage. Ils n'ont pas su fermer rapidement nos fronti\u00e8res lorsque la COVID a frapp\u00e9. Ensuite, ils n'ont pas r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 faire vacciner rapidement les Canadiens. Ils ont essay\u00e9 de conclure un accord avec le r\u00e9gime communiste chinois pour obtenir des vaccins. Bien entendu, ce fut un \u00e9chec lamentable. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821668\" data-originallang=\"en\">Les lib\u00e9raux ont \u00e9chou\u00e9 \u00e0 bien des \u00e9gards: l'affaire SNC-Lavalin, le scandale UNIS, les activit\u00e9s de financement donnant un acc\u00e8s privil\u00e9gi\u00e9, l'annulation de projets \u00e9nerg\u00e9tiques, des ministres et des d\u00e9put\u00e9s tomb\u00e9s en disgr\u00e2ce, l'\u00e9pisode du \u00ab blackface \u00bb, le voyage sur l'\u00eele priv\u00e9e de l'Aga Khan, l'absence d'un plan s\u00e9rieux pour ouvrir notre fronti\u00e8re internationale et les innombrables camouflages. Examinons un cas r\u00e9cent. Il s'agit du Laboratoire national de microbiologie de Winnipeg et du refus de fournir des documents essentiels \u00e0 un important comit\u00e9 parlementaire. Il y a de fortes chances que cette affaire fasse les gros titres pendant encore longtemps.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821669\" data-originallang=\"en\">Faut\u2011il s'\u00e9tonner que les Canadiens ne fassent pas confiance aux lib\u00e9raux? Faut\u2011il s'\u00e9tonner qu'ils ne puissent pas leur faire confiance pour un droit aussi sacr\u00e9 que la libert\u00e9 d'expression? Faut\u2011il s'\u00e9tonner que les gens ne fassent pas confiance au <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">ministre</a> qui propose le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-10</a>, un homme qui a un pass\u00e9 de radical, qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 emmen\u00e9, menottes aux poignets, et qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 reconnu coupable par un tribunal?</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821670\" data-originallang=\"en\">La censure a d\u00e9j\u00e0 commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 frapper Internet et elle se multiplie \u00e0 un rythme alarmant. Je parie que tous les Canadiens avec un ordinateur connaissent quelqu'un qui a vu l'une de ses publications sur les m\u00e9dias sociaux \u00eatre signal\u00e9e ou supprim\u00e9e par les g\u00e9ants du Web. C'\u00e9tait peut-\u00eatre pour quelque chose d'aussi simple qu'une opinion au sujet des r\u00e8gles li\u00e9es \u00e0 la COVID\u201119. Je parie que nous sommes nombreux \u00e0 conna\u00eetre quelqu'un qui a vu son compte de m\u00e9dias sociaux \u00eatre suspendu, voire ferm\u00e9 par les g\u00e9ants du Web. Il est ridicule qu'une personne dans la vingtaine se proclame juge dans une grande entreprise de technologie comme Twitter, Facebook ou YouTube.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821671\" data-originallang=\"en\">On dirait aussi que les voix conservatrices sont celles qui sont souvent cibl\u00e9es par les censeurs. C'est curieux de constater comment cela fonctionne. Les d\u00e9put\u00e9s peuvent-ils imaginer le genre de censure qui sera exerc\u00e9e si c'est le gouvernement lib\u00e9ral qui contr\u00f4le le contenu en ligne? Je fr\u00e9mis juste d'y penser.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821672\" data-originallang=\"en\">Certains pr\u00e9tendront peut-\u00eatre que, puisque je suis un d\u00e9put\u00e9 de l'opposition officielle, il est \u00e9vident que je critiquerai n'importe quel projet de loi des lib\u00e9raux. Eh bien, il n'y a pas que l'opposition officielle. Beaucoup de gens s'opposent \u00e0 ce projet de loi orwellien. Tous les gens de ma circonscription \u00e0 qui j'ai parl\u00e9 veulent que je m'y oppose. Personne n'est venu me dire: \u00ab Kerry, tu dois appuyer le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C\u201110</a>. \u00bb D'ailleurs, tellement de gens m'ont dit \u00eatre contre ce projet de loi que j'ai d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de lancer une p\u00e9tition \u00e9lectronique. Les gens se sont ru\u00e9s pour la signer. Je leur ai dit que j'\u00e9crirais directement au <a data-HoCid=\"214296\" href=\"/politicians/justin-trudeau/\" title=\"Justin Trudeau\">premier ministre</a> en leur nom et c'est ce que j'ai fait. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821673\" data-originallang=\"en\">Toujours au sujet des opposants au projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C\u201110</a>, les d\u00e9put\u00e9s devraient lire ce que Tim Denton a dit. Ancien commissaire national du CRTC et pr\u00e9sident en poste du chapitre canadien de l'Internet Society, M. Denton a affirm\u00e9 ceci: </p>\n<blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"6821674\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Le projet de loi C\u201110 vise manifestement \u00e0 permettre au gouvernement de contr\u00f4ler le discours \u00e0 son gr\u00e9. Ne tenez aucun compte des clignotants, voyez dans quelle direction les roues sont braqu\u00e9es. Vers la droite pour une communication libre par l'Internet. </p>\n</blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"6821675\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cela fait peur. \u00c0 qui les d\u00e9put\u00e9s devraient-ils faire confiance au sujet de ce projet de loi? Au <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">ministre du Patrimoine</a>, qui a un pass\u00e9 de radical, ou \u00e0 M. Denton? Moi, mon choix est fait. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821676\" data-originallang=\"en\">Qu'en est-il du commentaire de Peter Menzies? C'est un journaliste de longue date et un ancien vice-pr\u00e9sident du CRTC. J'ai travaill\u00e9 avec Peter lorsque j'\u00e9tais journaliste. C'est un bon gars, un gars intelligent. Il a tr\u00e8s bien r\u00e9sum\u00e9 le projet de loi lib\u00e9ral. Il a dit que le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C\u201110</a> \u00ab placera Internet sous le contr\u00f4le du [\u2026] CRTC. Ses neuf commissaires non \u00e9lus qui n'ont aucun compte \u00e0 rendre d\u00e9cideront si votre article sur Facebook ou votre vid\u00e9o sur YouTube repr\u00e9sente un contenu Internet appropri\u00e9 \u00bb. Mon ancien coll\u00e8gue poursuit en soulignant que le <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">ministre du Patrimoine</a> \u00ab a promis de pr\u00e9senter d'autres projets de loi pour \u00e9tablir un autre groupe de r\u00e9glementation afin de surveiller le type de propos que tiennent les gens sur les m\u00e9dias sociaux. Tout cela constitue un abus d'autorit\u00e9 scandaleux de la part du gouvernement \u00bb.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821677\" data-originallang=\"en\">On peut voir les cons\u00e9quences que pourrait avoir le projet de loi. Il se peut qu'une personne n'aime pas un programme gouvernemental, une politique ou un politicien et le d\u00e9nonce. Sa communication sera peut-\u00eatre bloqu\u00e9e ou annul\u00e9e. La culture de la censure est tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9sente dans le monde, ce n'est pas ce qui manque, et le projet de loi dont nous sommes saisis ne ferait qu'empirer les choses.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6821678\" data-originallang=\"en\">Bref, nous ne pouvons pas faire confiance au gouvernement lib\u00e9ral pour respecter notre libert\u00e9 d'expression. Compte tenu de son pass\u00e9 radical et douteux, nous ne pouvons pas faire confiance au <a data-HoCid=\"253406\" href=\"/politicians/steven-guilbeault/\" title=\"Steven Guilbeault\">ministre</a> pour respecter notre libert\u00e9 d'expression. Notre libert\u00e9 d'expression est trop sacr\u00e9e pour \u00eatre mise en p\u00e9ril par ce projet de loi terrible et dangereux. Les Canadiens le disent haut et fort. Le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"10926636\" href=\"/bills/43-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts\">C\u201110</a> doit \u00eatre rejet\u00e9. La d\u00e9mocratie m\u00eame au Canada est en jeu.</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2021/6/21/kerry-diotte-2/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/kerry-diotte/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4429/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "11412211",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Broadcasting Act",
        "fr": "La Loi sur la radiodiffusion"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2021/6/21/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2021%2F6%2F21%2F"
    }
}