This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2021-06-16 21:00:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Jack Harris (St. John's East, NDP)",
"fr": "M. Jack Harris (St. John's-Est, NPD)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6808944\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, the suggestion that this committee is appropriate was basically rejected by the Speaker in his ruling today. In reference to the National Security Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, he said:</p>\n<blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"6808945\" data-originallang=\"en\"> However, as the members for Louis-Saint-Laurent and St. John\u2019s East have pointed out, the act also makes clear that, despite its composition, this body is not a committee of Parliament. It exists outside of Parliament. In these circumstances, the Chair cannot conclude that the documents submitted to the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians fulfills an order of this House or of its committees. </p>\n</blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"6808946\" data-originallang=\"en\">That is very clear, and I invite you to refute that ruling.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6808944\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, l'affirmation selon laquelle ce comit\u00e9 est appropri\u00e9 a essentiellement \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9e par le Pr\u00e9sident dans sa d\u00e9cision d'aujourd'hui. \u00c0 propos du Comit\u00e9 des parlementaires sur la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale et le renseignement, il a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 ce qui suit:</p>\n<blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"6808945\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Cependant, comme l\u2019ont signal\u00e9 les d\u00e9put\u00e9s de Louis\u2011Saint\u2011Laurent et de St. John\u2019s\u2011Est, la loi pr\u00e9cise clairement que, malgr\u00e9 sa composition, cette entit\u00e9 n\u2019est pas un comit\u00e9 du Parlement. Ce Comit\u00e9 se trouve \u00e0 l\u2019ext\u00e9rieur du Parlement. Dans ces circonstances, la pr\u00e9sidence ne peut conclure que le d\u00e9p\u00f4t de documents au Comit\u00e9 des parlementaires sur la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale et le renseignement permet de satisfaire \u00e0 un ordre de la Chambre ou de ses comit\u00e9s. </p>\n</blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"6808946\" data-originallang=\"en\">C'est on ne peut plus clair, et je vous invite \u00e0 r\u00e9futer cette d\u00e9cision.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2021/6/16/jack-harris-8/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/jack-harris/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4553/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11400815",
"h1": {
"en": "Private Members' Business",
"fr": "Affaires \u00e9manant des d\u00e9put\u00e9s"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Privilege",
"fr": "Privil\u00e8ge"
},
"h3": {
"en": "Government's Alleged Non-compliance with an Order of the House",
"fr": "La non-conformit\u00e9 all\u00e9gu\u00e9e du gouvernement \u00e0 un ordre de la Chambre"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2021/6/16/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2021%2F6%2F16%2F"
}
}