This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2020-01-29 17:30:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Arif Virani",
"fr": "M. Arif Virani"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6031648\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, while I am thankful for the question, I do not think it is particularly germane to this bill. There is no contradiction whatsoever.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6031649\" data-originallang=\"en\">That initiative was put in place to avoid the politicization of a specific issue about the classification of firearms. Removing it from political consideration and entrenching it with a neutral civil service is entirely appropriate in that context.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6031650\" data-originallang=\"en\">What we are dealing with here is a situation where someone lodges a complaint about police action, and whether that police action should be handled by other police officials who may not be perceived to be, or actually be, neutral.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6031651\" data-originallang=\"en\">The two are entirely disconnected and not at all analogous.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6031648\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, je remercie le d\u00e9put\u00e9 de poser la question, mais je ne pense pas qu'elle soit pertinente par rapport \u00e0 ce projet de loi. Il n'y a pas la moindre contradiction.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6031649\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cette initiative a \u00e9t\u00e9 mise en place pour \u00e9viter que soit politis\u00e9e une question pr\u00e9cise concernant la classification des armes \u00e0 feu. Il est tout \u00e0 fait appropri\u00e9 dans ce contexte de la soustraire aux consid\u00e9rations politiques et de la confier \u00e0 des fonctionnaires, qui sont neutres. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6031650\" data-originallang=\"en\">Dans le cas pr\u00e9sent, nous parlons d'un cas o\u00f9 une personne porte plainte contre la police et o\u00f9 nous nous demandons si le comportement de la police en cause devrait \u00eatre examin\u00e9 par d'autres repr\u00e9sentants de la police, qui pourraient ne pas \u00eatre per\u00e7us comme neutres ou pourraient en fait ne pas l'\u00eatre.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6031651\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il n'y a aucun lien entre les deux cas, qui ne sont pas du tout analogues.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2020/1/29/arif-virani-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/arif-virani/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4435/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10739981",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act",
"fr": "La Loi sur la Gendarmerie royale du Canada"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2020/1/29/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2020%2F1%2F29%2F"
}
}