This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2019-04-11 10:25:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park\u2014Fort Saskatchewan, CPC)",
"fr": "M. Garnett Genuis (Sherwood Park\u2014Fort Saskatchewan, PCC)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5863708\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, again, we see the use of closure by the government. I want to ask a question about the particulars of the legislation it is bringing in closure on.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5863709\" data-originallang=\"en\">The Liberals call this, in the title of the bill, \u201cno-cost\u201d pardons. Of course, it is not no cost. It is just that the taxpayer would have to cover all of those costs.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5863710\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would like to know, given how limited the debate has been, the answers to a few key policy questions: How much is this legislation going to cost? Why is the government not considering targeting that cost relief to those who need it and those who cannot afford pardons while having those who can afford pardons still pay for them? Why is the government not considering alternatives, such as those proposed by other parties in this place that remove the records without the cost associated with the process that the government would put in place?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5863708\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, nous voyons encore une fois le gouvernement recourir \u00e0 la cl\u00f4ture. J'aimerais poser une question sur les d\u00e9tails du projet de loi pour lequel le gouvernement impose la cl\u00f4ture.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5863709\" data-originallang=\"en\">Dans le titre du projet de loi, les lib\u00e9raux font \u00e9tat de r\u00e9habilitations \u00ab sans frais \u00bb. De toute \u00e9vidence, elles ne sont pas sans frais. C'est simplement que le contribuable devra assumer tous ces co\u00fbts.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5863710\" data-originallang=\"en\">Compte tenu du caract\u00e8re limit\u00e9 du d\u00e9bat, j'aimerais obtenir des r\u00e9ponses \u00e0 quelques questions strat\u00e9giques cl\u00e9s: Combien co\u00fbtera ce projet de loi ? Pourquoi le gouvernement n'envisage-t-il pas de r\u00e9duire les frais de demande de r\u00e9habilitation pour les personnes qui en ont besoin et qui n'ont pas les moyens de payer ces frais et de laisser les personnes qui peuvent se le permettre continuer \u00e0 payer les frais actuels? Pourquoi le gouvernement n'envisage-t-il pas d'autres solutions, comme celles propos\u00e9es par d'autres partis \u00e0 la Chambre qui visent \u00e0 supprimer le casier judiciaire sans engager les co\u00fbts associ\u00e9s au processus que le gouvernement mettrait en place?</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2019/4/11/garnett-genuis-4/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/garnett-genuis/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4383/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10571361",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Ordres \u00e9manant du gouvernement"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Criminal Records Act",
"fr": "La Loi sur le casier judiciaire"
},
"h3": {
"en": "Bill C-93\u2014Time Allocation Motion",
"fr": "Projet de loi C-93 \u2014 Motion d'attribution de temps"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2019/4/11/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2019%2F4%2F11%2F"
}
}