This is a single speech (house debate) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2018-06-11 23:25:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. John Barlow",
        "fr": "M. John Barlow"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5479270\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I forgot to mention too for my friend from Vancouver Island that I really do appreciate his passion for his area. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5479271\" data-originallang=\"en\">To the question from my colleague, we are talking about the damage that could take place. No one saw any damage. There is a lot of innuendo and this is my problem with the Liberals' process in this bill. Everything is would have, should have, could have but it maybe actually did not happen at all. Nothing is science-based. If they want to make changes on this and legislation is going to have this kind of an impact on Canadians, then they should make sure they do their due diligence, make sure it is science-based, and make sure they do the consultation and that the changes they are making absolutely impact what they are trying to solve.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5479270\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ai oubli\u00e9 aussi de mentionner \u00e0 mon coll\u00e8gue de l'\u00eele de Vancouver que je le remercie vraiment de se passionner pour ce dossier.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5479271\" data-originallang=\"en\">Pour r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 la question de mon coll\u00e8gue, nous parlons des dommages qui pourraient \u00eatre caus\u00e9s. Personne n'a vu de dommages. Il y a beaucoup d'insinuations, et c'est ce que j'ai \u00e0 reprocher au processus des lib\u00e9raux pr\u00e9vu dans ce projet de loi. Tout devrait \u00eatre, aurait d\u00fb \u00eatre et aurait pu \u00eatre, mais peut-\u00eatre que rien ne s'est produit du tout. Rien n'est fond\u00e9 sur des donn\u00e9es scientifiques. Si les lib\u00e9raux veulent apporter des modifications \u00e0 la Loi pour qu'elle ait ce genre d'incidence sur les Canadiens, ils devraient faire preuve de diligence raisonnable, fonder leurs d\u00e9cisions sur des donn\u00e9es scientifiques, mener des consultations et veiller \u00e0 ce que les modifications qu'ils apportent touchent strictement les probl\u00e8mes qu'ils veulent r\u00e9gler.</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2018/6/11/john-barlow-3/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/john-barlow/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4377/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "10204741",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": "Initiatives Minist\u00e9rielles"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Fisheries Act",
        "fr": "La Loi sur les p\u00eaches"
    },
    "h3": {
        "en": "Report Stage",
        "fr": "\u00c9tape du rapport"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2018/6/11/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2018%2F6%2F11%2F"
    }
}