This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2018-05-25 10:45:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Hon. Candice Bergen",
"fr": "L\u2019hon. Candice Bergen"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5434261\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, we do need some clarification on this in that we had not gone to orders of the day. We were dealing with the member for <a data-HoCid=\"214129\" href=\"/politicians/daniel-blaikie/\" title=\"Daniel Blaikie\">Elmwood\u2014Transcona</a>'s point of order, which you cut him off. Then I brought in my intervention. Then the member for <a data-HoCid=\"214462\" href=\"/politicians/pierre-poilievre/\" title=\"Pierre Poilievre\">Carleton</a> rose on a separate point of order. You did not recognize him, for whatever reason, and then you moved to orders of the day. Then clearly you came back and stopped orders of the day and went back to the member for Carleton's point of order, which should have actually been heard before orders of the day.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5434262\" data-originallang=\"en\">I understand there was a lot happening here, but procedurally we do need some clarification on how he should have been recognized and been allowed to speak before we went to orders of the day. Instead. Mr. Speaker, you went to orders of the day, and now we have a bit of a situation on our hands that will need to be rectified.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5434261\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, je crois que nous avons vraiment besoin de pr\u00e9cisions. Nous n'en \u00e9tions pas encore \u00e0 l'ordre du jour; nous parlions encore du recours au R\u00e8glement du d\u00e9put\u00e9 d'<a data-HoCid=\"214129\" href=\"/politicians/daniel-blaikie/\" title=\"Daniel Blaikie\">Elmwood\u2014Transcona</a>, que vous avez interrompu. J'ai alors pris la parole, puis le d\u00e9put\u00e9 de <a data-HoCid=\"214462\" href=\"/politicians/pierre-poilievre/\" title=\"Pierre Poilievre\">Carleton</a> a invoqu\u00e9 le R\u00e8glement pour une tout autre raison. Vous ne lui avez pas donn\u00e9 la parole, quelle que soit la raison, puis vous avez d\u00e9clar\u00e9 que nous passions \u00e0 l'ordre du jour. Vous \u00eates alors vous-m\u00eame revenu en arri\u00e8re, puisque vous avez interrompu l'ordre du jour pour entendre le recours au R\u00e8glement du d\u00e9put\u00e9 de Carleton, ce qui devait se faire avant l'ordre du jour.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5434262\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je suis consciente qu'il se passe beaucoup de choses en m\u00eame temps, mais nous devons savoir comment, selon la proc\u00e9dure, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 aurait pu avoir la parole et faire valoir son point avant l'ordre du jour. C'est au contraire vous, monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, qui \u00eates pass\u00e9 \u00e0 l'ordre du jour, ce qui fait que nous sommes dans une situation dont on ne sait plus trop comment sortir. </p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2018/5/25/candice-bergen-2/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/candice-hoeppner/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1068/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10152075",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Extension of Sitting Hours",
"fr": "La prolongation des s\u00e9ances"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2018/5/25/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2018%2F5%2F25%2F"
}
}