This is a single speech (house debate) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2018-04-16 18:20:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Garnett Genuis",
        "fr": "M. Garnett Genuis"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5344715\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, I will also resist the temptation to comment on pipelines. I am sure my friend and I will have plenty of opportunity to discuss them in the future.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5344716\" data-originallang=\"en\">In terms of child care and looking at what options the government can facilitate, I think that parents are the best child care decision-makers. I think there are a lot of different types of child care arrangements that can work. The member spoke about one that I think is reflective of the kind of flexibility people are looking for.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5344717\" data-originallang=\"en\">For some people, their ideal would be to work from home, over the Internet or phone, while having their children there. For some people, the ability to bring their children with them to work is important. It may be more realistic in the context of the kind of work they do. I see a cultural shift happening where it is more and more acceptable to bring one's children to things, even things that in the past people may have raised their eyebrows and wonder why a child was there. From time to time, I will bring my children to meetings that I have. When we have round tables in my office, from time to time, we try to set it up so that there are toys and parents can bring their kids to play while the parents are participating in political discussions. I think those kinds of things are important.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5344718\" data-originallang=\"en\">From a government perspective, in terms of the spending power of the government, let us not decide where the ball is going. I do not think we should be picking winners and losers in terms of the economy. I also do not think we should be picking winners and losers in terms of the kind of child care arrangement. We should be looking for a way to support families in the context of the flexibility that they expect. The way we initially proposed to do that was by providing direct support to families, but there may be other ways, such as tax credits around initiatives that are undertaken by employers. Again, seeking the greatest possible flexibility in the context of how we do that is the way we should go.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5344715\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, je vais moi aussi r\u00e9sister \u00e0 la tentation de parler des pipelines. Je suis convaincu que ma coll\u00e8gue et moi aurons amplement l'occasion d'en discuter \u00e0 l'avenir.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5344716\" data-originallang=\"en\">En ce qui concerne les services de garde et les options que le gouvernement est en mesure de faciliter, je crois que les parents sont les mieux plac\u00e9s pour prendre les d\u00e9cisions relatives aux services de garde. Je crois qu'il y a de nombreux types de services de garde valables. La d\u00e9put\u00e9e a parl\u00e9 d'un genre de services qui illustre bien la souplesse recherch\u00e9e par les parents.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5344717\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Pour certaines personnes, l\u2019id\u00e9al serait de travailler \u00e0 la maison, par Internet ou par t\u00e9l\u00e9phone, tout en prenant soin de leurs enfants. Pour certaines personnes, la capacit\u00e9 d'amener leurs enfants au travail est importante. Il se peut que cela soit plus r\u00e9aliste pour certains types de travail. Je vois qu'un changement culturel est en train de s'op\u00e9rer et qu'il est de plus en plus acceptable d'amener ses enfants au travail, m\u00eame dans des situations qui, dans le pass\u00e9, ont pu faire sourciller et amener des gens \u00e0 se demander ce qu'un enfant faisait l\u00e0. De temps en temps, j'am\u00e8ne mes enfants aux r\u00e9unions auxquelles j'assiste. Lorsque nous avons des tables rondes dans mon bureau, de temps en temps, nous essayons de les organiser de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 ce qu'il y ait des jouets et que les parents puissent amener leurs enfants pendant qu'ils participent \u00e0 des discussions politiques. Je pense que ce genre de choses est important. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5344718\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Du point de vue du gouvernement, en ce qui concerne son pouvoir de d\u00e9penser, ne d\u00e9cidons pas \u00e0 la place des gens. Je ne pense pas que nous devrions choisir des gagnants et des perdants sur le plan \u00e9conomique. Je ne pense pas non plus que nous devrions choisir des gagnants et des perdants en ce qui concerne le genre d'entente \u00e0 offrir en mati\u00e8re de garde d'enfants. Nous devrions chercher un moyen de soutenir les familles en leur offrant la souplesse \u00e0 laquelle elles s'attendent. Au d\u00e9part, nous avons propos\u00e9 de le faire en offrant un soutien direct aux familles, mais il y a peut-\u00eatre d'autres moyens, comme des cr\u00e9dits d'imp\u00f4t pour les initiatives mises de l'avant par les employeurs. Je pense que la recherche de la plus grande souplesse possible dans notre fa\u00e7on de proc\u00e9der est la voie que nous devrions suivre.</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2018/4/16/garnett-genuis-4/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/garnett-genuis/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4383/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "10049897",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": "Initiatives Minist\u00e9rielles"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Budget Implementation Act, 2018, No. 1",
        "fr": "Loi no 1 d'ex\u00e9cution du budget de 2018"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2018/4/16/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2018%2F4%2F16%2F"
    }
}