This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2018-02-27 11:50:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mrs. Shannon Stubbs",
"fr": "Mme Shannon Stubbs"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5290011\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, we need to put this into context about what is happening in energy investment in Canada since the 2015 election under the Liberals. The two years after the election saw the steepest decline of energy investment in Canada from any other two-year period in 70 years. The dollar values are the equivalent of losing 75% of manufacturing, almost the entire aerospace industry in Canada. It is shocking that this has not been a pressing priority for the federal government and that it is bringing forward legislation that will cause more uncertainty and more risk, deterring more capital from Canada, which is important to every Canadian across the country. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5290012\" data-originallang=\"en\">The member is right on when he says that this flies in the face of all the Liberals' rhetoric about evidence, scientific-based decision-making, when they allow for political interference at multiple levels, including before the process even starts, and afterward by one single member of the cabinet who has already demonstrated a radical anti-energy agenda.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5290011\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, nous devons examiner le projet de loi en tenant compte de la situation des investissements dans les projets \u00e9nerg\u00e9tiques au Canada depuis que les lib\u00e9raux ont remport\u00e9 les \u00e9lections de 2015. Au cours des deux ans qui ont suivi les \u00e9lections, les investissements dans le secteur \u00e9nerg\u00e9tique du Canada ont connu la baisse la plus marqu\u00e9e en 70 ans. En valeur mon\u00e9taire, cela \u00e9quivaut \u00e0 une perte de 75 % des investissements dans l'industrie manufacturi\u00e8re et pr\u00e8s de 100 % des investissements dans l'industrie a\u00e9rospatiale canadienne. Il est scandaleux que ce probl\u00e8me ne repr\u00e9sente pas une priorit\u00e9 urgente pour le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral et que celui-ci pr\u00e9sente un projet de loi qui cr\u00e9era plus d'incertitude et de risque, ce qui d\u00e9couragera davantage l'afflux de capitaux au Canada. Les investissements sont tr\u00e8s importants pour tous les Canadiens du pays. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5290012\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 a raison de dire que le projet de loi va \u00e0 l'encontre de tous les beaux discours des lib\u00e9raux sur un processus d\u00e9cisionnel fond\u00e9 sur des donn\u00e9es probantes et des donn\u00e9es scientifiques. Il permet l'ing\u00e9rence politique \u00e0 de multiples niveaux, y compris avant m\u00eame que le processus commence et apr\u00e8s cela par un seul membre du Cabinet qui a d\u00e9j\u00e0 exprim\u00e9 des vues radicales et hostiles au secteur de l'\u00e9nergie.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2018/2/27/shannon-stubbs-6/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/shannon-stubbs/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4398/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9989752",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Impact Assessment Act",
"fr": "Loi sur l'\u00e9valuation d'impact"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2018/2/27/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2018%2F2%2F27%2F"
}
}