This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2018-11-20 14:45:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Chris Warkentin (Grande Prairie\u2014Mackenzie, CPC)",
"fr": "M. Chris Warkentin (Grande Prairie\u2014Mackenzie, PCC)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5676014\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, Canada's oil is being liquidated at $17 a barrel while our international competitors are getting $54. This discount is costing the Canadian economy $80 million each and every day and is a direct result of the Liberals' cancellation of the northern gateway, the Trans Mountain and the west-to-east pipeline projects. Now the Liberals have proposed something new. It is called a no-new-pipelines bill, Bill <a data-HoCid=\"9630600\" href=\"/bills/42-1/C-69/\" title=\"An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-69</a>. This is going to make this discount permanent.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5676015\" data-originallang=\"en\">Will the government kill Bill <a data-HoCid=\"9630600\" href=\"/bills/42-1/C-69/\" title=\"An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-69</a> and allow pipelines to be built, or is it prepared to allow this discount to continue?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5676014\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, le p\u00e9trole du Canada se vend \u00e0 17 $ le baril alors que celui de nos concurrents internationaux s'envole \u00e0 54 $ le baril. Ce tarif r\u00e9duit entra\u00eene chaque jour un manque \u00e0 gagner de 80 millions de dollars pour l'\u00e9conomie canadienne et r\u00e9sulte de l'annulation par les lib\u00e9raux des projets Northern Gateway et Trans Mountain et de l'ol\u00e9oduc \u00c9nergie Est. Maintenant, les lib\u00e9raux nous proposent quelque chose de nouveau. C'est le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"9630600\" href=\"/bills/42-1/C-69/\" title=\"An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-69</a>, qui vise \u00e0 interdire la construction de nouveaux ol\u00e9oducs. Il rendra permanent le tarif r\u00e9duit.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5676015\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le gouvernement renoncera-t-il au projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"9630600\" href=\"/bills/42-1/C-69/\" title=\"An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts\">C-69</a>? Permettra-t-il la construction de nouveaux ol\u00e9oducs, ou est-il pr\u00eat \u00e0 ce que l'\u00e9conomie canadienne continue de faire les frais de ce tarif r\u00e9duit?</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2018/11/20/chris-warkentin-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/chris-warkentin/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4275/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10383678",
"h1": {
"en": "Oral Questions",
"fr": "Questions Orales"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Natural Resources",
"fr": "Les ressources naturelles"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2018/11/20/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2018%2F11%2F20%2F"
}
}