This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2017-06-08 11:50:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Cheryl Hardcastle",
"fr": "Mme Cheryl Hardcastle"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4942225\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, that is the kind of question that can only be answered with true and full-on participation. If we want tangible results, if we think we are being active as a government, then we have to be able to go all out and participate in all of these different aspects.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4942226\" data-originallang=\"en\"> The talking points presented through that question are why, in our opposition day motion, we have included section (e), which states, \u201cexpress disappointment in Canada\u2019s vote against, and absence from, initial rounds of negotiations for a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons\u201d.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4942227\" data-originallang=\"en\">That being said, expressing that disappointment means that we see that there is a hopefulness and that we need to optimize the opportunities that are taking place right now. This is something that can be done. It is feasible. It is not Shangri-La. The importance of our having a full and expansive participation does not negate the work that is being done, but we have to see some tangible results when we are doing this all together. Ultimately, I can give you a timeline once we are actively participating in those talks. Therefore, support\u2014</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4942225\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, on ne saurait r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 cette question sans une participation pleine et enti\u00e8re. Si nous voulons des r\u00e9sultats tangibles, si nous pensons \u00eatre actifs en tant que gouvernement, nous devons pouvoir faire tout notre possible pour participer \u00e0 tous ces diff\u00e9rents aspects.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4942226\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Les arguments pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s dans cette question sont la raison pour laquelle nous avons inclus dans notre motion de l\u2019opposition le point e) ainsi libell\u00e9: \u00ab d\u00e9plore le vote du Canada contre l\u2019adoption d\u2019un instrument juridiquement contraignant pour l\u2019interdiction des armes nucl\u00e9aires, ainsi que l\u2019absence du Canada aux premi\u00e8res phases de n\u00e9gociation sur la question \u00bb.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4942227\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Cela dit, si nous exprimons notre d\u00e9ception, c\u2019est aussi que nous voyons un espoir et que nous devons optimiser les occasions qui se pr\u00e9sentent maintenant. C\u2019est faisable. Ce n\u2019est pas de l\u2019utopie. Souligner l\u2019importance de notre participation pleine et enti\u00e8re ne revient pas \u00e0 nier le travail \u00e0 faire, mais nous devons voir des r\u00e9sultats tangibles lorsque nous travaillons tous ensemble. En fait, je pourrai vous donner un \u00e9ch\u00e9ancier une fois que nous participerons activement \u00e0 ces pourparlers. Par cons\u00e9quent, appuyez\u2026 </p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2017/6/8/cheryl-hardcastle-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/cheryl-hardcastle/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4270/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9597744",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Business of Supply",
"fr": "Travaux des subsides"
},
"h3": {
"en": "Opposition motion\u2014Nuclear Disarmament",
"fr": "Motion de l'opposition \u2014 Le d\u00e9sarmement nucl\u00e9aire"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2017/6/8/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2017%2F6%2F8%2F"
}
}