This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2017-05-16 17:20:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Cheryl Hardcastle (Windsor\u2014Tecumseh, NDP)",
"fr": "Mme Cheryl Hardcastle (Windsor\u2014Tecumseh, NPD)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4878008\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, I would like to ask my hon. colleague if he can clarify some of the contradictions I have heard. The work in committee is something that is very aspirational. Bill <a data-HoCid=\"8073132\" href=\"/bills/42-1/C-4/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act\">C-4</a> was supposed to address many shortcomings and some regressive moves on the part of the previous government. This is now coming back and we are seeing more contradictions as the changes are explained. For instance, there was a Senate amendment to move all grievances under the Public Service Labour Relations Act instead of the RCMP Act. Does the member disagree with the report on workplace harassment in the RCMP, as recently as May 15, and if so\u2014</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4878008\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, j'aimerais demander \u00e0 mon coll\u00e8gue d'apporter quelques \u00e9claircissements sur certaines des contradictions que j'ai entendues. Le travail du comit\u00e9 est un travail tr\u00e8s ambitieux. Le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"8073132\" href=\"/bills/42-1/C-4/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act\">C-4</a> devait rem\u00e9dier \u00e0 de nombreuses lacunes et \u00e0 certaines mesures r\u00e9trogrades adopt\u00e9es par le gouvernement pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent. Il nous revient \u00e0 pr\u00e9sent et les contradictions se multiplient au fur et \u00e0 mesure qu'on nous explique les changements. Ainsi, le S\u00e9nat a propos\u00e9 un amendement visant \u00e0 faire en sorte que tous les griefs rel\u00e8vent de la Loi sur les relations de travail dans la fonction publique plut\u00f4t que de la Loi sur la GRC. Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 n'est-il pas d'accord avec le rapport sur le harc\u00e8lement en milieu de travail \u00e0 la GRC, publi\u00e9 pas plus tard que le 15 mai, et dans ce cas...</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2017/5/16/cheryl-hardcastle-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/cheryl-hardcastle/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4270/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9537785",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Public Service Labour Relations Act",
"fr": "La Loi sur les relations de travail dans la fonction publique"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2017/5/16/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2017%2F5%2F16%2F"
}
}