This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2017-05-15 18:00:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Don Davies",
"fr": "M. Don Davies"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4876293\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I say that because I read the budgets. I said that the government has put in less money, devoted less money over the next five years for addictions treatment than the previous government had budgeted for the same time period. That is just a fact. I would be happy to sit down with my colleague and go through the last budget tabled by the Conservative government and compare it to the budget that was just tabled a few months ago, that show the expenditures over the next four years and I will show him in black and white where it says that.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4876294\" data-originallang=\"en\">I do congratulate the government on changing this legislation, as it is long overdue, but I will give it a bit of criticism for taking so long. This is a public health emergency. We must remember that the New Democrats started raising this issue in February 2016. We are approaching a year and a half later where we have legislation before the House and in that 18 months there has not even been a declaration federally of a public health emergency, which would have the positive impact of actually sanctioning the current overdose prevention sites that are operating in Vancouver against the law currently. The government will not do that.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4876295\" data-originallang=\"en\">I have asked repeatedly. First, the Liberals said that there is no need to declare it a public health emergency because it does not do anything. When I pointed out that actually it would do two things, that it would allow emergency funding to flow and it would allow them to sanction the currently illegal overdose prevention sites, I heard silence from them. While I will congratulate the current government on taking some positive steps, again, I will give it no credit for progress until the death rates in this country start going down. Liberals cannot get credit when more people are dying every month from opioid overdoses than the previous month. I will measure progress on this side of the House when death rates go down, not up, unlike my colleagues in the Liberal Party. </p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4876293\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, je le dis parce que je lis les budgets. Je dis que le gouvernement actuel a pr\u00e9vu moins d'argent sur cinq ans pour le traitement de la toxicomanie que ne l'avait fait le gouvernement pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent dans son budget pour le m\u00eame nombre d'ann\u00e9es. C'est un fait. Je serais heureux de discuter avec mon coll\u00e8gue du dernier budget d\u00e9pos\u00e9 par le gouvernement conservateur et de comparer ce budget avec celui qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 il y a quelques mois. Ces budgets font \u00e9tat des d\u00e9penses pr\u00e9vues pour les quatre ann\u00e9es suivantes. Je vais lui montrer o\u00f9 c'est \u00e9crit noir sur blanc.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4876294\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je f\u00e9licite le gouvernement d'avoir modifi\u00e9 la loi, bien qu'il ait attendu trop longtemps. Il s'agit d'une urgence nationale en mati\u00e8re de sant\u00e9 publique. Je tiens \u00e0 souligner que les n\u00e9o-d\u00e9mocrates avaient commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 parler de ce probl\u00e8me en f\u00e9vrier 2016. Pr\u00e8s d'un an et demi plus tard, le projet de loi n'a toujours pas \u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9. Pendant ces 18 mois, le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral a refus\u00e9 de d\u00e9clarer une urgence de sant\u00e9 publique. Une telle d\u00e9claration aurait pu permettre de cautionner les activit\u00e9s des centres de pr\u00e9vention des surdoses qui sauvent des vies \u00e0 Vancouver et qui sont exploit\u00e9s ill\u00e9galement \u00e0 l'heure actuelle. Le gouvernement refuse de faire une telle d\u00e9claration.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4876295\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'en ai fait la demande \u00e0 maintes reprises. D'abord, les lib\u00e9raux ont r\u00e9pondu qu'il n'\u00e9tait pas n\u00e9cessaire de d\u00e9clarer une urgence de sant\u00e9 publique parce que cette mesure n'aurait aucun effet. Lorsque j'ai indiqu\u00e9 qu'elle permettrait en fait deux choses, soit le versement de fonds d'urgence et la reconnaissance des centres de pr\u00e9vention des surdoses actuellement exploit\u00e9s de fa\u00e7on ill\u00e9gale, ils sont rest\u00e9s silencieux. Je reconnais que le gouvernement a pris des mesures positives, mais je ne lui accorderai aucun m\u00e9rite pour les progr\u00e8s r\u00e9alis\u00e9s tant que les taux de mortalit\u00e9 n'auront pas commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 baisser au pays. Les lib\u00e9raux ne m\u00e9riteront aucune f\u00e9licitation tant que le nombre de gens qui meurent chaque mois \u00e0 la suite d'une surdose d'opio\u00efdes sera plus \u00e9lev\u00e9 que le mois pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent. De ce c\u00f4t\u00e9-ci de la Chambre, nous allons mesurer le progr\u00e8s r\u00e9alis\u00e9 selon la baisse des taux de mortalit\u00e9, et non malgr\u00e9 leur hausse, comme le font mes coll\u00e8gues du Parti lib\u00e9ral.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2017/5/15/don-davies-7/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/don-davies/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1007/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9531588",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Controlled Drugs and Substances Act",
"fr": "La loi r\u00e9glementant certaines drogues et autres substances"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2017/5/15/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2017%2F5%2F15%2F"
}
}