Speech (House debate)

{
    "time": "2017-03-20 15:20:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Michel Boudrias",
        "fr": "M. Michel Boudrias"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4806945\"> With regard to the approval to build a new airport on City of Terrebonne and City of Mascouche land announced by the Department of Transport on November 4, 2016: (<em>a</em>) what are the details of the analysis grid used to approve the project, including (i) the complete list of all items to be considered, (ii) the relative weight of each item to be considered, (iii) the indicators to measure the items in (i); (<em>b</em>) what data was compiled by the Department to evaluate the following factors related to building an airport concerning (i) safety issues and hazards associated with its operations, (ii) social and political acceptability, (iii) the environmental impacts on fauna, flora, and humans, including data shared with the Department of the Environment, (iv) economic spin-offs and consequences; (<em>c</em>) what data was taken into account by the Ministry to evaluate the following factors related to building a new airport on City of Terrebonne and City of Mascouche land concerning (i) safety issues and hazards associated with its operations, including those resulting from a nearby landfill, (ii) social and political acceptability, (iii) the environmental impacts on fauna, flora, and humans, including data shared with the Department of the Environment, (iv) economic spin-offs and consequences; (<em>d</em>) does the Department anticipate economic spin-offs from the future airport\u2019s operations; (<em>e</em>) if the answer to (d) is affirmative, to what types, what contexts, and what amounts, broken down by year, do its economic spin-off evaluations correspond; (<em>f</em>) if the answer to (<em>d</em>) is affirmative, does the Department evaluate the possibility of public funds being requested or committed to (i) develop and build the airport, (ii) any type of associated future project, (iii) its ongoing operations and, where applicable, what are the amounts, broken down by source, including programs, ministries, special funds, discretionary funds, etc., of each of its evaluations; (<em>g</em>) did the Department incur costs related to (i) analyzing the file, (ii) taking measures, (iii) collecting existing or non-existing data and, where applicable, what is the value of these costs and the type of each expenditure; (<em>h</em>) when an airport development project receives approval from the Department and there are environmental impacts, does the Department anticipate compensation to offset the project\u2019s ecological losses; (<em>i</em>) what improvements does the Minister of Transport anticipate making to the evaluation process and what is the anticipated timeline for these changes; (<em>j</em>) what is the anticipated timeline for changes to require public consultations announced for early 2017 to be held; and (<em>k</em>) does the Minister of Transport intend to propose changes to the evaluation process so that the consultations to be held are not overseen by the project\u2019s proponent? </p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4806945\"> En ce qui concerne l\u2019autorisation d\u2019\u00e9tablissement d\u2019un nouvel a\u00e9roport sur les territoires des villes de Terrebonne et de Mascouche rendue par le Minist\u00e8re des Transports en date du 4 novembre 2016: <em>a</em>) quels sont les d\u00e9tails li\u00e9s \u00e0 la grille d\u2019analyse servant \u00e0 autoriser ou non le projet, y compris (i) la liste compl\u00e8te de tous les objets devant \u00eatre pris en compte, (ii) le poids relatif de chacun des objets pris en compte l\u2019un par rapport \u00e0 l\u2019autre, (iii) les indicateurs servant \u00e0 mesurer les objets en (i); <em>b</em>) quelles sont les donn\u00e9es compil\u00e9es par le Minist\u00e8re afin d\u2019\u00e9valuer les facteurs suivants li\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tablissement d\u2019un a\u00e9roport concernant (i) les d\u00e9fis reli\u00e9s \u00e0 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 et aux dangers associ\u00e9s \u00e0 ses activit\u00e9s, (ii) l\u2019acceptabilit\u00e9 sociale et politique, (iii) les impacts environnementaux sur la faune, la flore et les humains, notamment les donn\u00e9es \u00e9chang\u00e9es avec le minist\u00e8re de l\u2019Environnement, (iv) les retomb\u00e9es ou cons\u00e9quences \u00e9conomiques; <em>c</em>) quelles ont \u00e9t\u00e9 les donn\u00e9es prises en compte par le Minist\u00e8re afin d\u2019\u00e9valuer les facteurs suivants li\u00e9s \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9tablissement du nouvel a\u00e9roport sur les territoires des villes de Terrebonne et Mascouche en ce qui concerne (i) les d\u00e9fis concernant la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 et les dangers associ\u00e9s \u00e0 ses activit\u00e9s, notamment ceux occasionn\u00e9s par la pr\u00e9sence d\u2019un site d\u2019enfouissement \u00e0 proximit\u00e9, (ii) l\u2019acceptabilit\u00e9 sociale et politique, (iii) les impacts environnementaux sur la faune, la flore et les humains, notamment les donn\u00e9es \u00e9chang\u00e9es avec le minist\u00e8re de l\u2019Environnement, (iv) les retomb\u00e9es ou cons\u00e9quences \u00e9conomiques; <em>d</em>) le Minist\u00e8re pr\u00e9voit-il des retomb\u00e9es \u00e9conomiques li\u00e9es aux activit\u00e9s du futur a\u00e9roport; <em>e</em>) si la r\u00e9ponse en d) est affirmative, de quelle nature, dans quels contextes et \u00e0 quels montants, ventil\u00e9s par ann\u00e9e, correspondent ses \u00e9valuations des retomb\u00e9es \u00e9conomiques; <em>f</em>) si la r\u00e9ponse en <em>d</em>) est affirmative, le Minist\u00e8re \u00e9value-t-il la possibilit\u00e9 que des fonds publics soient demand\u00e9s ou engag\u00e9s dans (i) l\u2019\u00e9tablissement ou la construction de l\u2019a\u00e9roport, (ii) des projets futurs en tout genre s\u2019y rattachant, (iii) la poursuite de ses activit\u00e9s et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, quels sont les montants, ventil\u00e9s par provenance, notament les programmes, minist\u00e8res, fonds sp\u00e9ciaux, discr\u00e9tionnaires, etc., de chacune de ses \u00e9valuations; <em>g</em>) y a-t-il eu des co\u00fbts engendr\u00e9s par le Minist\u00e8re reli\u00e9s \u00e0 (i) l\u2019analyse de dossier, (ii) la prise de mesures, (iii) la r\u00e9colte de donn\u00e9es d\u00e9j\u00e0 existantes ou non et, le cas \u00e9ch\u00e9ant, quelle est la valeur de ces co\u00fbts et de quelle nature sont chacune de ces d\u00e9penses; <em>h</em>) lorsqu'un projet d\u2019\u00e9tablissement d\u2019a\u00e9roport re\u00e7oit l'aval du Minist\u00e8re et qu\u2019il a des impacts sur l'environnement, le Minist\u00e8re pr\u00e9voit-il un mode de compensation pour limiter les pertes \u00e9cologiques li\u00e9es au projet; <em>i</em>) quelles sont les am\u00e9liorations que pr\u00e9voit apporter le ministre des Transports \u00e0 ce processus d\u2019\u00e9valuation et quel est l\u2019\u00e9ch\u00e9ancier pr\u00e9vu concernant ces modifications; <em>j</em>) quel est l\u2019\u00e9ch\u00e9ancier pr\u00e9vu concernant la modification visant \u00e0 rendre obligatoire la tenue de consultations publiques annonc\u00e9e pour le d\u00e9but de l\u2019ann\u00e9e 2017; <em>k</em>) le ministre des Transports a-t-il l\u2019intention de proposer un changement au processus d\u2019\u00e9valuation afin que la consultation devant \u00eatre faite ne soit pas sous la responsabilit\u00e9 du promoteur du projet?</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2017/3/20/michel-boudrias-1/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/michel-boudrias/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4217/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "p4806945",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Routine Proceedings",
        "fr": "Affaires Courantes"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Questions on the Order Paper",
        "fr": "Questions au Feuilleton"
    },
    "h3": {
        "en": "Question No. 805",
        "fr": "Question no 805"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2017/3/20/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2017%2F3%2F20%2F"
    }
}