Speech (House debate)

{
    "time": "2016-10-06 17:10:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. G\u00e9rard Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent, CPC)",
        "fr": "M. G\u00e9rard Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent, PCC)"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4512795\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I had the privilege and pleasure of working with my colleague, the brand new hon. member of the House, on the special committee. I deeply appreciate her co-operation and her knowledge of the subject. I know the member is a scholar, and it is good for all of us to have a person of this quality in the House.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4512796\" data-originallang=\"en\">I have some points that I want to talk to her about. On the same question, I have the same answer. If we have the answer, we should not ask the same question 10 times. However, it is subjective and quite difficult to identify the subject and whether or not a good answer was given. It is too difficult for the Speaker to say if the question was not answered. It would be good to see, but I am not sure that the Speaker would appreciate having to judge the quality of the answers and questions. The Speaker is doing his job well right now.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4512797\" data-originallang=\"fr\">My question for my colleague is this: does she believe that it would be too difficult to judge the quality of the answers and the quality of the questions, and therefore nearly impossible to enforce the proposal, namely to limit the number of questions on a given subject to two? </p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4512795\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ai eu l'honneur et le plaisir de travailler au sein du comit\u00e9 sp\u00e9cial avec ma coll\u00e8gue, qui est toute nouvelle \u00e0 la Chambre. Je lui suis tr\u00e8s reconnaissant de sa collaboration et de sa connaissance du sujet. Je sais qu'elle est tr\u00e8s cultiv\u00e9e, et c'est bon pour nous tous d'avoir une personne de cette qualit\u00e9 \u00e0 la Chambre.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4512796\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je veux lui parler de certains points. \u00c0 la m\u00eame question, je donne la m\u00eame r\u00e9ponse. Si on obtient la r\u00e9ponse, on ne devrait pas poser la m\u00eame question \u00e0 r\u00e9p\u00e9tition. Cependant, la subjectivit\u00e9 entre en jeu, et il est plut\u00f4t difficile de cerner le sujet et de d\u00e9terminer si la r\u00e9ponse donn\u00e9e est bonne ou non. Il est tr\u00e8s difficile pour le Pr\u00e9sident de dire si on a r\u00e9pondu \u00e0 la question. Ce serait bien qu'il puisse le faire, mais je ne suis pas certain qu'il aimerait avoir \u00e0 juger de la qualit\u00e9 des questions et des r\u00e9ponses. \u00c0 l'heure actuelle, le Pr\u00e9sident fait tr\u00e8s bien son travail.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4512797\" data-originallang=\"fr\">La question que je pose \u00e0 ma coll\u00e8gue est la suivante: juge-t-elle que ce serait trop difficile d'identifier la qualit\u00e9 des r\u00e9ponses et la qualit\u00e9 des questions, et donc que ce serait presque impossible d'appliquer la proposition, c'est-\u00e0-dire de mener \u00e0 deux seulement le nombre de questions sur un sujet?</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2016/10/6/gerard-deltell-2/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/gerard-deltell/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4432/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "9149729",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Orders Of The Day",
        "fr": "Ordre Du Jour"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Standing Orders and Procedure",
        "fr": "Le R\u00e8glement et la proc\u00e9dure"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2016/10/6/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2016%2F10%2F6%2F"
    }
}