This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2016-01-28 11:50:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Linda Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona, NDP)",
"fr": "Mme Linda Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona, NPD)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4182126\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madam Speaker, the former parliamentary budget officer has reported that the Conservatives left almost nine billion budgeted dollars unspent last year.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4182127\" data-originallang=\"en\"> These dollars could have been spent to support job creation, retraining, the clean energy sector, and economic diversification. Their stance has simply been that we have a one-company town. When I went door-to-door in the last campaign, I talked to many oilfield workers who said that they were tired of the boom-and-bust economy and who wanted some economic diversification. However, the government completely drained the important funds for new energy sectors, such as energy efficiency, renewable energy, and clean-energy dollars budgeted for those sectors that could have created new retraining opportunities and jobs.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4182128\" data-originallang=\"en\">The Northern Alberta Institute of Technology, in my city of Edmonton, has tripled enrolment in their renewable energy training program. It has a 100% job creation record, when their students graduate.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4182129\" data-originallang=\"en\">The Conservatives simply missed the boat for 10 years. They could have invested and provided economic alternatives while the oil price was plummeting. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4182130\" data-originallang=\"en\">Even if and when we get those pipelines built, there will be an interim period in which we need to be employing our Canadians. I would like to hear the Conservatives defend why they let that $9 billion go by when we could have retrained workers in Canada.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4182126\" data-originallang=\"en\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, l'ancien directeur parlementaire du budget a signal\u00e9 que les conservateurs ont laiss\u00e9 une enveloppe budg\u00e9taire de pr\u00e8s de 9 milliards de dollars inutilis\u00e9e l'an dernier.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4182127\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Ces fonds auraient pu \u00eatre utilis\u00e9s pour appuyer la cr\u00e9ation d'emplois, le recyclage professionnel, le secteur de l'\u00e9nergie propre et la diversification \u00e9conomique. La position des conservateurs a tout simplement \u00e9t\u00e9 qu'il n'y a qu'une entreprise dans notre r\u00e9gion. Lorsque j'ai fait du porte-\u00e0-porte pendant la derni\u00e8re campagne \u00e9lectorale, j'ai parl\u00e9 \u00e0 de nombreux travailleurs du secteur p\u00e9trolier, qui ont d\u00e9clar\u00e9 qu'ils en avaient assez d'une \u00e9conomie en dents de scie et qu'ils souhaitaient une diversification de l'\u00e9conomie. Pourtant, le gouvernement a compl\u00e8tement siphonn\u00e9 les importantes ressources financi\u00e8res pr\u00e9vues pour le secteur des nouvelles sources d'\u00e9nergie, notamment les fonds pour l'am\u00e9lioration de l'efficacit\u00e9 \u00e9nerg\u00e9tique, ainsi que pour les sources d'\u00e9nergie renouvelable et d'\u00e9nergie propre. Utilis\u00e9es \u00e0 bon escient, ces ressources auraient pu cr\u00e9er des emplois et des possibilit\u00e9s de recyclage professionnel.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4182128\" data-originallang=\"en\">\u00c0 l'Institut de technologie du Nord de l'Alberta, qui est situ\u00e9 \u00e0 Edmonton, o\u00f9 j'habite, les inscriptions au programme de formation en \u00e9nergie renouvelable ont tripl\u00e9. Cet \u00e9tablissement a un taux de cr\u00e9ation d'emploi de 100 % lorsque les \u00e9tudiants obtiennent leur dipl\u00f4me.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4182129\" data-originallang=\"en\">Les conservateurs ont tout simplement rat\u00e9 le coche pendant 10 ans. Ils auraient pu faire des investissements et offrir des solutions de rechange sur le plan \u00e9conomique lorsque le prix du p\u00e9trole s'est effondr\u00e9.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4182130\" data-originallang=\"en\">M\u00eame si les pipelines sont construits, il y aura d'ici l\u00e0 une p\u00e9riode de transition pendant laquelle il faudra faire travailler les Canadiens. J'aimerais entendre les conservateurs expliquer pourquoi ils n'ont pas utilis\u00e9 ces 9 milliards de dollars, alors que ceux-ci auraient pu servir au recyclage professionnel de travailleurs au Canada.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2016/1/28/linda-duncan-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/linda-duncan/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1029/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "8773257",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Initiatives Minist\u00e9rielles"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Business of Supply",
"fr": "Travaux des subsides"
},
"h3": {
"en": "Opposition Motion\u2014Energy East Pipeline Project",
"fr": "Motion de l'opposition \u2014 Le Projet d\u2019ol\u00e9oduc \u00c9nergie Est"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2016/1/28/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2016%2F1%2F28%2F"
}
}