This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2016-01-25 17:45:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Marilyn Gladu",
"fr": "Mme Marilyn Gladu"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4178855\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, obviously, I am not pleased to see energy not mentioned in the throne speech. It is an extremely important part of our GDP. When it comes to pipelines, I referred in my speech to Patricia Mohr who is the global hydrocarbon strategist for Scotiabank. If we look at our GDP and where we are going to grow, there is nothing that we can immediately substitute in the fossil fuel industry. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4178856\" data-originallang=\"en\">There is $160 billion of opportunity in the upgrading of products that if we do not upgrade, one million barrels a day are being shipped down to the U.S. in place of the Keystone XL pipeline that was not approved. It is now going in a more dangerous way by rail. The U.S. will then upgrade those products into the solvents that we bring back. We are certainly losing opportunities. Pipelines are a great answer and I would encourage the government to spend the infrastructure money on energy east.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4178855\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, je ne me r\u00e9jouis \u00e9videmment pas que le discours du Tr\u00f4ne ne parle pas de l'\u00e9nergie, qui est un aspect tr\u00e8s important du PIB du Canada. \u00c0 propos des ol\u00e9oducs, j'ai parl\u00e9 dans mon allocution de Patricia Mohr, strat\u00e8ge de la Banque Scotia en mati\u00e8re d'hydrocarbures mondiales. Si nous voulons faire cro\u00eetre le PIB du Canada, il faut savoir que nous ne pouvons rien substituer, pour le moment, \u00e0 l'industrie des combustibles fossiles.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4178856\" data-originallang=\"en\">La valorisation des produits de ce secteur aurait des retomb\u00e9es \u00e9conomiques de 160 milliards de dollars. Si nous choisissions de ne pas am\u00e9liorer ces produits, 1 million de barils seraient transport\u00e9s aux \u00c9tats-Unis au lieu d'\u00eatre envoy\u00e9s par l'ol\u00e9oduc Keystone XL, qui n'a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 approuv\u00e9. Ces barils sont maintenant transport\u00e9s par voie ferroviaire, qui est plus dangereuse. Les \u00c9tats-Unis transforment donc ces produits en solvants, que nous importons par la suite. Il va sans dire que nous perdons des d\u00e9bouch\u00e9s. Les ol\u00e9oducs sont une excellente solution, et j'invite le gouvernement \u00e0 consacrer les fonds destin\u00e9s aux infrastructures au projet \u00c9nergie Est. </p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2016/1/25/marilyn-gladu-5/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/marilyn-gladu/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4197/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "8767008",
"h1": {
"en": "Speech From The Throne",
"fr": "Discours Du Tr\u00f4ne"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Resumption of debate on Address in Reply",
"fr": "Reprise du d\u00e9bat sur l'Adresse en r\u00e9ponse"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2016/1/25/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2016%2F1%2F25%2F"
}
}