This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2015-02-16 17:20:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Hon. Mauril B\u00e9langer (Ottawa\u2014Vanier, Lib.)",
"fr": "L'hon. Mauril B\u00e9langer (Ottawa\u2014Vanier, Lib.)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3973883\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I have worked with the member for <a data-HoCid=\"170302\" href=\"/politicians/daryl-kramp/\" title=\"Daryl Kramp\">Prince Edward\u2014Hastings</a> and I have a lot of respect for him.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3973884\" data-originallang=\"en\">The question I have for the member is along the lines of the question I posed earlier. I do not have a problem with a unified force that would respect our guards, and I think that is what everyone in this House is saying. I do not have difficulty with it being the RCMP. My difficulty would be if the RCMP had to report to the government as opposed to reporting to Parliament.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3973885\" data-originallang=\"en\">What does my colleague think about the notion of including such a measure in the government's motion, so that it is clearly stated that once the RCMP becomes the unitary form of security to ensure the security of all of us on the Hill, including our staff and visitors both inside and outside, that it is also stipulated in the motion that it reports to parliamentary authorities and not the government?</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3973886\" data-originallang=\"en\">That is not clear now. I would like to hear the member's comments on that notion. </p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3973883\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ai travaill\u00e9 avec le d\u00e9put\u00e9 de <a data-HoCid=\"170302\" href=\"/politicians/daryl-kramp/\" title=\"Daryl Kramp\">Prince Edward\u2014Hastings</a> et j'ai beaucoup de respect pour lui.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3973884\" data-originallang=\"en\">La question que j'aimerais poser au d\u00e9put\u00e9 est semblable \u00e0 celle que j'ai pos\u00e9e tout \u00e0 l'heure. Je n'ai rien contre l'id\u00e9e de cr\u00e9er une force unifi\u00e9e qui respecterait les int\u00e9r\u00eats de nos gardiens de s\u00e9curit\u00e9, et je crois que tous les d\u00e9put\u00e9s sont de cet avis. Le fait que la GRC soit \u00e0 la t\u00eate de cette force ne pose pas de probl\u00e8me, \u00e0 mon avis. Ce qui me d\u00e9range, c'est que la GRC aurait \u00e0 rendre des comptes au gouvernement, et non au Parlement. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3973885\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mon coll\u00e8gue serait-il d'accord pour inclure, dans la motion du gouvernement, une phrase expliquant clairement que, lorsque la GRC sera l'organisme central devant assurer la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 de tous les gens qui se trouvent sur la Colline, y compris les employ\u00e9s et les visiteurs qui se trouvent \u00e0 l'int\u00e9rieur ou \u00e0 l'ext\u00e9rieur des \u00e9difices, elle devra rendre des comptes aux autorit\u00e9s parlementaires, et non au gouvernement? </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3973886\" data-originallang=\"en\">Pour l'instant, cette notion n'est pas claire du tout. J'aimerais savoir ce qu'en pense le d\u00e9put\u00e9.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2015/2/16/mauril-belanger-4/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/mauril-belanger/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/3687/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "8577912",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Parliamentary Precinct Security",
"fr": "La s\u00e9curit\u00e9 dans la Cit\u00e9 parlementaire"
},
"h3": {
"en": "Consideration Resumed of Motion",
"fr": "Reprise de l'\u00e9tude de la motion"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2015/2/16/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2015%2F2%2F16%2F"
}
}