Speech (House debate)

{
    "time": "2014-09-22 18:00:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Ms. Megan Leslie (Halifax, NDP)",
        "fr": "Mme Megan Leslie (Halifax, NPD)"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3828106\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, last night in Halifax I was with some friends, a group of women, some feminists. We were getting together to talk about different issues. I said that I was speaking to a bill tomorrow and asked if any of them had any feedback or perspectives they thought were missing in this debate. Everyone knew instantly what bill I was talking about.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828107\" data-originallang=\"en\">Rehtaeh Parsons' story has touched us all in Nova Scotia. It has left an indelible mark on all of us as Nova Scotians to know that this woman died by suicide as a result of images about her spread over the Internet. It has also ignited a really good and healthy debate in Nova Scotia. Everyone has taken part in this conversation, and we are trying to find solutions. The province put together a cyberbullying task force to think about what steps the province can take to prevent this tragedy from happening again. The debate has been lively, solemn, and very real. People have taken this burden seriously and have said that this is something we need to figure out as a community.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828108\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I was at this gathering of friends last night, and I told them I had to speak to this bill. One of the women I was with said, \u201cThe problem you will have tomorrow with this speech is that the Conservatives are not actually interested in issues. They are just interested in advancing their own agenda, and if they happen to find a situation or a case that helps them advance that agenda, they will use that opportunity to their advantage.\u201d I really believe that this is what is happening here.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828109\" data-originallang=\"en\">There are many reasons why I care about this issue. I care because Rehtaeh Parsons was a member of my community, because she was raped, because she was humiliated, and because she felt that the only option for her, the only way to end that humiliation, was suicide.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828110\" data-originallang=\"en\">I care about this bill as a woman and as a public figure who understands the hurtful and humiliating power of the Internet. I care about this bill as a feminist. I care about this bill as a legislator, because Rehtaeh Parsons is not the only victim. I want to ensure that we have legislation in place to prevent cyberbullying. I want to send a message to Canadians that the distribution of private images without consent will not be tolerated. There are a lot of reasons to care about this bill.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828111\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I know that I speak for all of my NDP colleagues when I say that we must better protect people of all ages from the distribution of private images without consent. That is without any controversy. We were all proud to support our colleague, the member for <a data-HoCid=\"170644\" href=\"/politicians/robert-chisholm/\" title=\"Robert Chisholm\">Dartmouth\u2014Cole Harbour</a>, when he tabled his bill. He worked to present a balanced and sensible proposal to deal with this issue. He proposed Bill <a data-HoCid=\"6254139\" href=\"/bills/41-2/C-540/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Criminal Code (non-consensual making or distributing of intimate images)\">C-540</a>, a bill that would make it an offence to produce or distribute intimate images of individuals without their consent. We stand in solidarity with the member for <a data-HoCid=\"170644\" href=\"/politicians/robert-chisholm/\" title=\"Robert Chisholm\">Dartmouth\u2014Cole Harbour</a>. Rehtaeh Parsons' parents are his constituents. He made a commitment to them to figure out how we could change the law to prevent this kind of tragedy from happening again.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828112\" data-originallang=\"en\">However, as my friend said last night, the Conservatives do not have an interest in this issue. They have an interest in advancing an agenda, because Bill <a data-HoCid=\"6301394\" href=\"/bills/41-2/C-13/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Canada Evidence Act, the Competition Act and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act\">C-13</a>, the bill we have before us, goes well beyond what we need to do to change legislation to prevent cyberbullying. The scope of this bill is much larger than my colleague from <a data-HoCid=\"170644\" href=\"/politicians/robert-chisholm/\" title=\"Robert Chisholm\">Dartmouth\u2014Cole Harbour</a>'s proposal.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828113\" data-originallang=\"en\">Members will remember when the former public safety minister, Vic Toews, stood up in this House and said that we were with them or with the child pornographers. That was in February 2012. It was a pivotal moment for me in my experience as a member of Parliament, because the response from the community was swift and strong. Canadians said, \u201cNot on our watch does a member get away with saying stuff like that\u201d. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828114\" data-originallang=\"en\">That was February 2012. It was when government introduced its hyperbolically named \u201cprotecting children from Internet predators act\u201d. It was a bill that everyone rejected. We in the NDP rejected it, privacy advocates rejected it, and the public rejected it. The government was shamed into pulling this bill, never to be heard from again or so we thought.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828115\" data-originallang=\"en\">Here we are and it is two years later, and finally the Conservatives have figured out a way. They have found their vehicle to get those changes brought in. This is their vehicle. This is their opportunity. They are taking two very tragic events, the deaths of Amanda Todd and Rehtaeh Parsons, and are using those events to advance their own agenda because, lo and behold, two years later we find the long-forgotten aspects of the Toews bill here in Bill <a data-HoCid=\"6301394\" href=\"/bills/41-2/C-13/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Canada Evidence Act, the Competition Act and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act\">C-13</a>. Only this time it is under the auspices of cyberbullying.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828116\" data-originallang=\"en\">What does targeting banks' financial data have to do with cyberbullying? What does making changes to the Terrorist Financing Act have to do with young people and the spread of images online without consent? If they are trying to prevent cyberbullying, why in the world do they need to change rules around telemarketing and the theft of communications services? It is a gross misuse of our privilege, the privilege we have as parliamentarians. It is dishonest and it is an abuse of the trust Canadians put in us when they cast their ballots.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828117\" data-originallang=\"en\">If we were honest about our commitment to preventing cyberbullying, we would pass my NDP colleague's motion. If we were honest about our commitment to preventing bullying, we would have passed the motion put forward by my colleague, the member for <a data-HoCid=\"170347\" href=\"/politicians/dany-morin/\" title=\"Dany Morin\">Chicoutimi\u2014Le Fjord</a>, to develop a national anti-bullying strategy. If we were honest about our commitment to preventing cyberbullying, we would have split this bill a long time ago.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828118\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would like to thank my colleague, the member for <a data-HoCid=\"170299\" href=\"/politicians/francoise-boivin/\" title=\"Fran\u00e7oise Boivin\">Gatineau</a>, who has worked incredibly hard on the bill, giving us advice as members of Parliament, doing the legal analysis, going to committee. She has tried at every turn to split the bill, because we agree with parts of it but not the rest.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828119\" data-originallang=\"en\"> It would be an incredible victory if we could say that this piece of legislation passed with unanimous consent, that there we were as parliamentarians, united in working to prevent cyberbullying. Instead, we have everything and the kitchen sink thrown into one bill, so of course the New Democrats have to say no. Of course we have to vote against it and that is going to be used for political partisan purposes. Thank goodness we cannot send ten percenters into other people's ridings anymore, because I know I would have one sent into my riding saying, \u201cDo you realize that the member for Halifax voted against protecting your children?\u201d</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828120\" data-originallang=\"en\">It is for partisan purposes. We should be splitting the bill. We have tried to split the bill. We also have tried to bring forward amendments. These are not crazy, complicated ideas for fixing the bill. They are simple and elegant. Some of these changes are not deal breakers; it is just changing a word. An example is raising the standard from \u201creasonable grounds to suspect\u201d to \u201creasonable grounds to believe\u201d. It is one simple word. We know what the solution is. Change that word from \u201csuspect\u201d to \u201cbelieve\u201d because there is a world of difference between those two concepts. I am suspicious all the time. Do I actually believe that things are happening? Probably not. It is a big legal difference. It is an elegant and simple solution. We proposed it after hearing from witnesses at committee, yet the proposition was voted down.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828121\" data-originallang=\"en\">When my colleague, the member for <a data-HoCid=\"170644\" href=\"/politicians/robert-chisholm/\" title=\"Robert Chisholm\">Dartmouth\u2014Cole Harbour</a>, introduced his bill in June 2013, this was, as I said, a commitment to his constituents, Glen Canning and Leah Parsons. The member did an interview with Tobi Cohen, a journalist here on Parliament Hill, on July 22, 2013. He said at that time that he does not care who gets credit as long as it gets done, and he hoped the government would introduce a piece of legislation, because as we know, the process of passing government legislation is much more swift. The member said, \u201cI hope that they don\u2019t try to wrap too many things into one piece of legislation.\u201d</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828122\" data-originallang=\"en\">Maybe we should not be so cynical as to try and predict that this kind of thing is going to happen, but it is the modus operandi here these days. Perhaps I can address some of my other points when I answer questions. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828123\" data-originallang=\"en\">I find this whole bill to be disappointing. I really wish we could have worked together on this.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3828106\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, hier soir, j'\u00e9tais \u00e0 Halifax avec un groupe d'amies, dont certaines sont f\u00e9ministes. Nous nous \u00e9tions retrouv\u00e9es pour discuter de choses et d'autres. J'ai mentionn\u00e9 que je prendrais la parole \u00e0 propos d'un projet de loi aujourd'hui, et j'ai demand\u00e9 si elles avaient des commentaires ou si certaines perspectives \u00e9taient peu repr\u00e9sent\u00e9es dans ce d\u00e9bat. Elles savaient toutes, instantan\u00e9ment, de quel projet de loi il \u00e9tait question.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828107\" data-originallang=\"en\">L'histoire de Rehtaeh Parsons a touch\u00e9 tous les habitants de la Nouvelle-\u00c9cosse. Les N\u00e9o-\u00c9cossais ont tous \u00e9t\u00e9 marqu\u00e9s de fa\u00e7on ind\u00e9l\u00e9bile quand ils ont appris qu'une femme s'\u00e9tait suicid\u00e9e \u00e0 cause d'images d'elle-m\u00eame diffus\u00e9es sur Internet. Cette histoire a \u00e9t\u00e9 le point de d\u00e9part d'un dialogue sain et fructueux en Nouvelle-\u00c9cosse. Tout le monde participe \u00e0 la discussion, et nous sommes toujours \u00e0 la recherche de solutions. La province a mis sur pied un groupe de travail sur la cyberintimidation charg\u00e9 de penser aux gestes que pourrait poser la province afin qu'une telle trag\u00e9die ne se reproduise jamais. Les d\u00e9bats sont enlev\u00e9s, solennels et profond\u00e9ment sinc\u00e8res. Les gens prennent ce fl\u00e9au au s\u00e9rieux et consid\u00e8rent qu'il faut trouver des solutions ensemble, en tant que communaut\u00e9.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828108\" data-originallang=\"en\">Donc, hier soir, j'ai dit \u00e0 mon groupe d'amies que je prendrais la parole \u00e0 propos de ce projet de loi. L'une des femmes m'a dit ceci: \u00ab Le probl\u00e8me que tu auras demain, c'est que les conservateurs ne s'int\u00e9ressent pas vraiment aux probl\u00e8mes. Ils veulent seulement faire avancer leur cause. S'ils trouvent une situation ou une affaire qui peut les aider \u00e0 faire avancer leur cause, ils en tireront parti. \u00bb C'est exactement ce qui se produit ici, selon moi.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828109\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cette question me tient \u00e0 coeur pour bien des raisons. Elle me tient \u00e0 coeur parce que Rehtaeh Parsons \u00e9tait membre de ma communaut\u00e9, parce qu'elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 viol\u00e9e et humili\u00e9e, et parce qu'elle croyait que la seule fa\u00e7on de mettre fin \u00e0 cette humiliation, la seule option qui s'offrait \u00e0 elle, \u00e9tait de se suicider.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828110\" data-originallang=\"en\">Ce projet de loi me tient \u00e0 coeur en tant que femme et personnalit\u00e9 publique qui comprend \u00e0 quel point Internet a le pouvoir de nous blesser et de nous humilier. Il me tient \u00e0 coeur en tant que f\u00e9ministe. Il me tient aussi \u00e0 coeur en tant que l\u00e9gislatrice parce que Rehtaeh Parsons n'est pas la seule victime. Je souhaite qu'une mesure l\u00e9gislative soit mise en place pour pr\u00e9venir la cyberintimidation. Je veux faire comprendre aux Canadiens que la distribution non consensuelle d'images intimes ne sera pas tol\u00e9r\u00e9e. Il y a beaucoup de raisons pour lesquelles ce projet de loi me tient \u00e0 coeur.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828111\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je sais que je parle pour tous mes coll\u00e8gues n\u00e9o-d\u00e9mocrates quand je dis qu'il est n\u00e9cessaire de mieux prot\u00e9ger les gens de tous les \u00e2ges contre la distribution d'images intimes sans leur consentement. Il n'y a aucun diff\u00e9rend \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard. Nous avons tous \u00e9t\u00e9 fiers d'appuyer notre coll\u00e8gue, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 de <a data-HoCid=\"170644\" href=\"/politicians/robert-chisholm/\" title=\"Robert Chisholm\">Dartmouth\u2014Cole Harbour</a>, quand il a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 son projet de loi. Il s'est efforc\u00e9 de pr\u00e9senter une proposition \u00e9quilibr\u00e9e et raisonnable pour r\u00e9gler ce probl\u00e8me. Il a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"6254139\" href=\"/bills/41-2/C-540/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Criminal Code (non-consensual making or distributing of intimate images)\">C-540</a>, un projet de loi qui \u00e9rigerait en infraction le fait de produire ou de distribuer des images intimes d\u2019une personne sans son consentement. Nous sommes solidaires du d\u00e9put\u00e9 de <a data-HoCid=\"170644\" href=\"/politicians/robert-chisholm/\" title=\"Robert Chisholm\">Dartmouth\u2014Cole Harbour</a>. Les parents de Rehtaeh Parsons habitent dans sa circonscription. Il leur a donn\u00e9 l'assurance que nous trouverions un moyen de modifier la loi afin d'emp\u00eacher que ce type de trag\u00e9die ne se reproduise.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828112\" data-originallang=\"en\">Toutefois, comme mon amie l'a dit hier soir, les conservateurs ne s'int\u00e9ressent pas \u00e0 cette question. Ils sont plut\u00f4t int\u00e9ress\u00e9s \u00e0 faire avancer leur cause parce que le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"6301394\" href=\"/bills/41-2/C-13/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Canada Evidence Act, the Competition Act and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act\">C-13</a>, \u00e0 savoir la mesure l\u00e9gislative dont nous sommes saisis, va bien au-del\u00e0 de ce que nous devons faire pour modifier la loi afin de pr\u00e9venir la cyberintimidation. La port\u00e9e de ce projet de loi est beaucoup plus vaste que celle du projet de loi pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par mon coll\u00e8gue de <a data-HoCid=\"170644\" href=\"/politicians/robert-chisholm/\" title=\"Robert Chisholm\">Dartmouth\u2014Cole Harbour</a>.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828113\" data-originallang=\"en\">Les d\u00e9put\u00e9s se souviendront de la d\u00e9claration que l'ancien ministre de la S\u00e9curit\u00e9 publique, Vic Toews, avait faite \u00e0 la Chambre: \u00ab vous avez le choix de vous joindre \u00e0 nous ou aux adeptes de pornographie juv\u00e9nile \u00bb. Nous \u00e9tions alors en f\u00e9vrier 2012. Ce fut un moment marquant pour moi \u00e0 titre de d\u00e9put\u00e9e, parce que la population a r\u00e9pondu rapidement et avec force. Les Canadiens ont clairement fait comprendre qu'ils n'accepteraient pas qu'un d\u00e9put\u00e9 tienne de tels propos.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828114\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous \u00e9tions alors en f\u00e9vrier 2012, \u00e0 l'\u00e9poque o\u00f9 le gouvernement avait pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 un projet de loi portant le titre pompeux de Loi sur la protection des enfants contre les cyberpr\u00e9dateurs. Tout le monde a rejet\u00e9 ce projet de loi: le NPD, les d\u00e9fenseurs du droit \u00e0 la vie priv\u00e9e et le public. Le gouvernement, couvert de honte, a retir\u00e9 le projet de loi; nous pensions alors ne plus jamais en entendre parler.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828115\" data-originallang=\"en\">Or, nous voici ici, deux ans plus tard, et les conservateurs ont trouv\u00e9 une fa\u00e7on de ramener la question sur le tapis. Ils ont trouv\u00e9 l'instrument qui leur permettrait de faire adopter ces modifications. La mesure l\u00e9gislative \u00e0 l'\u00e9tude est leur instrument. Ils ont saisi l'occasion. Ils utilisent deux trag\u00e9dies, les morts d'Amanda Todd et de Rehtaeh Parsons, pour faire avancer leur programme. Quelle ne fut pas notre surprise de retrouver dans le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"6301394\" href=\"/bills/41-2/C-13/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Canada Evidence Act, the Competition Act and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act\">C-13</a> des \u00e9l\u00e9ments, oubli\u00e9s depuis fort longtemps, du projet de loi pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 par le ministre Toews. La seule diff\u00e9rence: les conservateurs utilisent aujourd'hui la cyberintimidation comme pr\u00e9texte.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828116\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mais quel est le lien entre les donn\u00e9es financi\u00e8res des banques et la cyberintimidation? Qu'est-ce que les modifications propos\u00e9es \u00e0 la loi sur le financement des activit\u00e9s terroristes ont \u00e0 voir avec les jeunes et la distribution non consensuelle d\u2019images en ligne? Si les conservateurs essaient de pr\u00e9venir la cyberintimidation, pourquoi diable est-il n\u00e9cessaire de modifier les r\u00e8gles visant le t\u00e9l\u00e9marketing et le vol de services de t\u00e9l\u00e9communications? Les conservateurs utilisent \u00e0 tr\u00e8s mauvais escient le privil\u00e8ge dont nous disposons \u00e0 titre de parlementaires. C'est malhonn\u00eate, et ils abusent de la confiance que les Canadiens nous t\u00e9moignent lorsqu'ils exercent leur droit de vote.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828117\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Si nous avions \u00e9t\u00e9 s\u00e9rieux dans notre volont\u00e9 de pr\u00e9venir la cyberintimidation, nous aurions adopt\u00e9 la motion que de mon coll\u00e8gue n\u00e9o-d\u00e9mocrate de <a data-HoCid=\"170347\" href=\"/politicians/dany-morin/\" title=\"Dany Morin\">Chicoutimi\u2014Le Fjord</a> avait pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e afin d'\u00e9tablir une strat\u00e9gie nationale contre l'intimidation. Si nous avions vraiment l'intention de respecter notre engagement, nous aurions scind\u00e9 le projet de loi il y a bien longtemps.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828118\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je tiens \u00e0 remercier ma coll\u00e8gue, la d\u00e9put\u00e9e de <a data-HoCid=\"170299\" href=\"/politicians/francoise-boivin/\" title=\"Fran\u00e7oise Boivin\">Gatineau</a>, qui a travaill\u00e9 d'arrache-pied sur le projet de loi: elle a conseill\u00e9 les d\u00e9put\u00e9s, effectu\u00e9 une analyse juridique et particip\u00e9 aux s\u00e9ances du comit\u00e9. Elle a fait tout son possible pour faire scinder le projet de loi, car nous en appuyons certaines parties.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828119\" data-originallang=\"en\">Ce serait une victoire retentissante pour nous de pouvoir dire que les parlementaires, unis dans leur d\u00e9sir de lutter contre la cyberintimidation, ont adopt\u00e9 le projet de loi \u00e0 l'unanimit\u00e9. Mais on a pr\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 nous pr\u00e9senter un projet de loi fourre-tout, et donc les n\u00e9o-d\u00e9mocrates vont devoir s'y opposer. Nous allons devoir voter contre, ce que le gouvernement va retourner contre nous \u00e0 des fins partisanes. Dieu merci qu'on ne puisse plus envoyer de dix-pour-cent dans d'autres circonscriptions, parce que je sais que les \u00e9lecteurs de la mienne en auraient re\u00e7u un disant: \u00ab Saviez-vous que la d\u00e9put\u00e9e de Halifax s'oppose \u00e0 ce qu'on prot\u00e8ge vos enfants? \u00bb</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828120\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le projet de loi a \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 \u00e0 des fins partisanes. Il devrait \u00eatre scind\u00e9. Nous avons essay\u00e9 de le scinder. Nous avons \u00e9galement essay\u00e9 de proposer des amendements. Ce ne sont pas des id\u00e9es farfelues et compliqu\u00e9es que nous avons propos\u00e9es pour am\u00e9liorer le projet de loi, mais bien des solutions simples et \u00e9l\u00e9gantes. Il ne s'agit pas de changer toute la mesure, mais bien de changer un mot. Par exemple, nous voulons resserrer le crit\u00e8re juridique en rempla\u00e7ant le segment \u00ab motifs raisonnables de soup\u00e7onner \u00bb par \u00ab motifs raisonnables de croire \u00bb. C'est un simple mot. Nous connaissons la solution. Il suffit de remplacer \u00ab soup\u00e7onner \u00bb par \u00ab croire \u00bb, ce qui ferait une \u00e9norme diff\u00e9rence. J'ai toujours des soup\u00e7ons. Cela veut-il dire que je crois vraiment qu'il se passe quelque chose? S\u00fbrement pas. C'est une grande diff\u00e9rence juridique. La solution que nous proposons est \u00e9l\u00e9gante et simple. Nous l'avons propos\u00e9e apr\u00e8s avoir entendu les t\u00e9moignages au comit\u00e9, mais elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9e.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828121\" data-originallang=\"en\">Lorsque mon coll\u00e8gue, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 de <a data-HoCid=\"170644\" href=\"/politicians/robert-chisholm/\" title=\"Robert Chisholm\">Dartmouth\u2014Cole Harbour</a>, a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 son projet de loi en juin 2013, il a pris, comme je l'ai d\u00e9j\u00e0 dit, un engagement envers deux \u00e9lecteurs de sa circonscription, Glen Canning et Leah Parsons. Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 a accord\u00e9 une entrevue \u00e0 Tobi Cohen, journaliste sur la Colline du Parlement, le 22 juillet 2013. Il a dit \u00e0 l'\u00e9poque qu'il se fichait de savoir qui recevrait les f\u00e9licitations tant que la mesure \u00e9tait prise, et qu'il esp\u00e9rait que le gouvernement pr\u00e9sente un projet de loi parce que, comme nous le savons bien, les projets des loi d'initiative minist\u00e9rielle sont adopt\u00e9s beaucoup plus rapidement. Il a dit: \u00ab J'esp\u00e8re qu'ils ne vont pas chercher \u00e0 inclure trop de choses dans un seul projet de loi. \u00bb</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828122\" data-originallang=\"en\">Peut-\u00eatre que nous ne devrions pas laisser notre cynisme nous amener \u00e0 pr\u00e9dire que ce genre de chose aura lieu, mais il semble que ce soit la fa\u00e7on de proc\u00e9der ces jours-ci. Peut-\u00eatre vais-je pouvoir soulever d'autres points lorsque je r\u00e9pondrai aux questions des d\u00e9put\u00e9s.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3828123\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je trouve le projet de loi d\u00e9cevant. J'aurais vraiment aim\u00e9 qu'on puisse collaborer dans ce dossier.</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2014/9/22/megan-leslie-3/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/megan-leslie/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1099/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "8443073",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Protecting Canadians from Online Crime Act",
        "fr": "Loi sur la protection des Canadiens contre la cybercriminalit\u00e9"
    },
    "h3": {
        "en": "Motions in Amendment",
        "fr": "Motions d'amendement"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2014/9/22/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2014%2F9%2F22%2F"
    }
}