Speech (House debate)

{
    "time": "2014-03-25 13:30:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Erin O'Toole (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade, CPC)",
        "fr": "M. Erin O'Toole (secr\u00e9taire parlementaire du ministre du Commerce international, PCC)"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3626087\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, I only caught the last half of the speech by the member for <a data-HoCid=\"170457\" href=\"/politicians/brian-masse/\" title=\"Brian Masse\">Windsor West</a>. What troubles me about his remarks is that he was praising a number of groups that opposed steam generator transport, thereby criticizing the work of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, which is a quasi-judicial body that uses science and expert testimony to determine whether something is safe for transport. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3626088\" data-originallang=\"en\">In the case of those steam generators, the misinformation by the Council of Canadians and other groups, which is not based on science but on fear, actually hurts the economy and hurt jobs, like those of the Power Workers' Union. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3626089\" data-originallang=\"en\">Those generators would have less chance of exposing people to radioactivity than an X-ray a Canadian might have. It is a radically low amount.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3626090\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would ask the member if his party, the NDP, puts the work of the Council of Canadians and some of these email-based groups above the work of our quasi-judicial Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3626087\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, malheureusement, je n'ai entendu que la deuxi\u00e8me moiti\u00e9 de l'expos\u00e9 du d\u00e9put\u00e9 de <a data-HoCid=\"170457\" href=\"/politicians/brian-masse/\" title=\"Brian Masse\">Windsor-Ouest</a>. Je suis pr\u00e9occup\u00e9 par le fait qu'il a louang\u00e9 un certain nombre de groupes qui se sont oppos\u00e9s au transport de g\u00e9n\u00e9rateurs de vapeur. Il se trouve ainsi \u00e0 critiquer le travail de la Commission canadienne de s\u00fbret\u00e9 nucl\u00e9aire, un organisme quasi judiciaire qui s'appuie sur des donn\u00e9es scientifiques et le t\u00e9moignage d'experts afin de d\u00e9terminer si des mati\u00e8res peuvent \u00eatre transport\u00e9es en toute s\u00e9curit\u00e9.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3626088\" data-originallang=\"en\">En ce qui concerne les g\u00e9n\u00e9rateurs de vapeur, la d\u00e9sinformation faite par le Conseil des Canadiens et d'autres groupes, qui ne s'appuient pas sur des donn\u00e9es scientifiques et qui cherchent \u00e0 semer la peur, nuit \u00e0 l'\u00e9conomie et aux emplois, notamment ceux occup\u00e9s par les membres du Syndicat des travailleurs et travailleuses du secteur \u00e9nerg\u00e9tique. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3626089\" data-originallang=\"en\">Ces g\u00e9n\u00e9rateurs risqueraient moins d'exposer les Canadiens \u00e0 des ondes radioactives que les rayons X. On parle d'une tr\u00e8s faible quantit\u00e9.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3626090\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 pourrait-il nous dire si son parti, le NPD, accorde plus de poids au travail du Conseil des Canadiens et certains de ces groupes en ligne qu'\u00e0 celui de la Commission canadienne de s\u00fbret\u00e9 nucl\u00e9aire, un organisme quasi judiciaire?</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2014/3/25/erin-otoole-1/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/erin-otoole/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4154/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "8275956",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Energy Safety and Security Act",
        "fr": "Loi sur la s\u00fbret\u00e9 et la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 en mati\u00e8re \u00e9nerg\u00e9tique"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2014/3/25/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2014%2F3%2F25%2F"
    }
}