This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2014-12-05 10:25:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Kevin Lamoureux (Winnipeg North, Lib.)",
"fr": "M. Kevin Lamoureux (Winnipeg-Nord, Lib.)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3930916\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, my question is in relation to a program that the Liberal Party has talked about a great deal. That is the EI premium exemption, which would apply for every new hire for employers. It was exceptionally well received by different stakeholders who have given it credit. It has the potential of creating literally tens of thousands of jobs.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3930917\" data-originallang=\"en\"> If we compare that to the government's plan, which is the small business job credit plan, it is questionable in terms of the number of jobs it would create. It is very expensive, and a number are suggesting that it would, in some bizarre, twisted way, actually provide an incentive to lay off some people who are in marginal types of positions.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3930918\" data-originallang=\"en\">Could the member explain to the House why the government is not recognizing the valuable idea that has been put forward by the Liberal Party, which would actually create literally thousands of jobs for every region of our country?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3930916\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, ma question concerne un programme dont le Parti lib\u00e9ral a beaucoup parl\u00e9, \u00e0 savoir l'exon\u00e9ration des cotisations \u00e0 l'assurance-emploi pour les employeurs, laquelle s'appliquerait \u00e0 chaque nouvelle embauche. Cette proposition a \u00e9t\u00e9 exceptionnellement bien re\u00e7ue par diff\u00e9rents intervenants qui ont reconnu son m\u00e9rite. Cela pourrait litt\u00e9ralement cr\u00e9er des dizaines de milliers d'emplois.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3930917\" data-originallang=\"en\">En comparaison, on ne sait pas combien d'emplois cr\u00e9erait le cr\u00e9dit pour l'emploi visant les petites entreprises propos\u00e9 par le gouvernement. Ce cr\u00e9dit co\u00fbte tr\u00e8s cher et certains pensent qu'il constituerait, d'une fa\u00e7on bizarre et tordue, une mesure incitative pour mettre \u00e0 pied certaines personnes qui occupent des postes marginaux.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3930918\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 pourrait-il expliquer \u00e0 la Chambre pourquoi le gouvernement ne reconna\u00eet pas la proposition utile pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par le Parti lib\u00e9ral, laquelle cr\u00e9erait litt\u00e9ralement des milliers d'emplois dans toutes les r\u00e9gions du pays?</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2014/12/5/kevin-lamoureux-2/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/kevin-lamoureux/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4032/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "8544600",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Initiatives Minist\u00e9rielles"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Economic Action Plan 2014 Act, No. 2",
"fr": "Loi no 2 sur le plan d'action \u00e9conomique de 2014"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2014/12/5/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2014%2F12%2F5%2F"
}
}