This is a single speech (house debate) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2014-10-20 16:25:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Ms. Elizabeth May (Saanich\u2014Gulf Islands, GP)",
        "fr": "Mme Elizabeth May (Saanich\u2014Gulf Islands, PV)"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3856147\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I would just like to note, parenthetically, that I disagree with my hon. colleague from <a data-HoCid=\"170750\" href=\"/politicians/kevin-lamoureux/\" title=\"Kevin Lamoureux\">Winnipeg North</a> about whether we got the right balance on cyberbullying in Bill C-13. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3856148\" data-originallang=\"en\">However, let me get back to Bill <a data-HoCid=\"6524311\" href=\"/bills/41-2/S-4/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act\">S-4</a>. Is it not just a question, more than whether this is a warrantless act or semantics, whether Bill S-4 would withstand a Supreme Court challenge in light of the Spencer decision? I would ask my hon. colleague for his comments. </p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3856147\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ouvre une parenth\u00e8se pour dire que je ne suis pas d'accord avec le d\u00e9put\u00e9 de <a data-HoCid=\"170750\" href=\"/politicians/kevin-lamoureux/\" title=\"Kevin Lamoureux\">Winnipeg-Nord</a> en ce qui concerne le juste \u00e9quilibre atteint en mati\u00e8re de cyberintimidation dans le projet de loi C-13.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3856148\" data-originallang=\"en\">Quoi qu'il en soit, je reviens au projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"6524311\" href=\"/bills/41-2/S-4/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act\">S-4</a>. Au lieu de se perdre en consid\u00e9rations s\u00e9mantiques sur ce qui peut \u00eatre fait sans mandat ou pas, ne devrait-on pas se demander si, \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de la d\u00e9cision <em>Spencer</em>, le projet de loi S-4 r\u00e9sisterait \u00e0 une contestation judiciaire devant la Cour supr\u00eame? Qu'en pense le d\u00e9put\u00e9?</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2014/10/20/elizabeth-may-1/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/elizabeth-may/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4108/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "8473691",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": "Initiatives Minist\u00e9rielles"
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Digital Privacy Act",
        "fr": "Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels num\u00e9riques"
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2014/10/20/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2014%2F10%2F20%2F"
    }
}