{"time": "2012-06-12 13:35:00", "attribution": {"en": "Mr. Wayne Marston (Hamilton East\u2014Stoney Creek, NDP)", "fr": "M. Wayne Marston (Hamilton-Est\u2014Stoney Creek, NPD)"}, "content": {"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2933055\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for the interest she has shown in this process. This is what concerns me. I sit on the finance committee. We were about to look at a budget bill and we had environmental changes that should have been before a different committee. We had the fisheries. They belonged where they could have people come in and do the due diligence necessary, with experts brought before the committee.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2933056\" data-originallang=\"en\"> We talked about OAS and, as the member said, the Conservatives did not mention this in the last election. There was not a word. As well, they did not mention changing EI.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2933057\" data-originallang=\"en\"> However, the one thing that stood out to me as very odd was the Conservatives took away the civilian oversight over CSIS. The people who live in that shadowy world, we would think Canadians would say that it made no sense at all to have that a budget bill.</p>", "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2933055\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, je remercie la d\u00e9put\u00e9e de l'int\u00e9r\u00eat qu'elle porte au processus. C'est ce qui me pr\u00e9occupe. Je si\u00e8ge au Comit\u00e9 des finances. Nous allions examiner un projet de loi d'ex\u00e9cution du budget et nous avons \u00e9tudi\u00e9 des modifications propos\u00e9es \u00e0 des dispositions environnementales qui auraient d\u00fb \u00eatre renvoy\u00e9es \u00e0 un comit\u00e9 diff\u00e9rent. Nous avons \u00e9tudi\u00e9 des modifications concernant les p\u00eaches. Elles auraient d\u00fb \u00eatre \u00e9tudi\u00e9es par un comit\u00e9 devant lequel des experts auraient comparu et o\u00f9 des t\u00e9moins auraient pu exercer la diligence raisonnable qui s'impose.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2933056\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous avons discut\u00e9 de la S\u00e9curit\u00e9 de la vieillesse et, comme la d\u00e9put\u00e9e l'a dit, les conservateurs n'en ont pas parl\u00e9 lors de la derni\u00e8re campagne \u00e9lectorale. Ils n'ont pas souffl\u00e9 mot \u00e0 ce sujet. Ils n'ont pas non plus mentionn\u00e9 les changements \u00e0 l'assurance-emploi.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2933057\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cependant, la mesure qui m'a sembl\u00e9 tr\u00e8s \u00e9trange est la suppression de la surveillance civile du SCRS. Cet organisme \u00e9volue dans un monde myst\u00e9rieux et il me semble que les Canadiens doivent penser que c'est une mesure qui n'a aucune raison de se trouver dans un projet de loi d'ex\u00e9cution du budget.</p>"}, "url": "/debates/2012/6/12/wayne-marston-2/", "politician_url": "/politicians/wayne-marston/", "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/492/", "procedural": false, "source_id": "7648349", "h1": {"en": "Government Orders", "fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"}, "h2": {"en": "Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act", "fr": "Loi sur l'emploi, la croissance et la prosp\u00e9rit\u00e9 durable"}, "document_url": "/debates/2012/6/12/", "related": {"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2012%2F6%2F12%2F"}}