This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2012-10-26 12:15:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. H\u00e9l\u00e8ne LeBlanc",
"fr": "Mme H\u00e9l\u00e8ne LeBlanc"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3025033\"> With regard to the government\u2019s decision to prevent the acquisition of the firm Macdonald, Dettwiler and Associates by Alliant Techsystems Inc. under the Investment Canada Act: (<em>a</em>) which factors persuaded the government that the acquisition was not of \u201cnet benefit\u201d to Canada; (<em>b</em>) which senior officials or outside consultants made recommendations regarding this transaction, including (i) their names, (ii) their duties; (<em>c</em>) what were the specific criteria used to determine whether the transaction was of \u201cnet benefit\u201d to Canada; and (<em>d</em>) what was contained in the reports or memos written on the issue as to whether the transaction under consideration was of \u201cnet benefit\u201d to Canada, including (i) the report title, (ii) the name of the author (or authors), (iii) the title and duties of the author (or authors), (iv) the report\u2019s status, namely whether it is public or not, (v) the date of the report or memo, (vi) the intended audience of the report or memo?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3025033\">En ce qui concerne la d\u00e9cision du gouvernement d'emp\u00eacher l'acquisition de la firme Macdonald, Dettwiler and Associates par Alliant Techsystems Inc. en vertu de la Loi sur Investissement Canada: <em>a</em>) quels facteurs ont convaincu le gouvernement que l'acquisition ne comportait pas un \u00ab avantage net \u00bb pour le Canada; <em>b</em>) quels hauts fonctionnaires ou consultants externes ont \u00e9mis des recommandations pertinentes sur cette transaction, y compris (i) leurs noms, (ii) leurs fonctions; <em>c</em>) quels \u00e9taient les crit\u00e8res sp\u00e9cifiques utilis\u00e9s pour d\u00e9terminer si la transaction constituait un \u00ab avantage net \u00bb au Canada; <em>d</em>) que contenaient les rapports ou m\u00e9mos \u00e9crits sur la question \u00e0 savoir si la transaction consid\u00e9r\u00e9e constituait \u00ab avantage net \u00bb pour le Canada, y compris (i) le nom du rapport, (ii) le nom de l'auteur (ou des auteurs), (iii) les titres et fonctions de l'auteur (ou des auteurs), (iv) le statut du rapport, \u00e0 savoir s'il est public ou non, (v) la date du rapport ou m\u00e9mo, (vi) le destinataire du rapport ou m\u00e9mo? </p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2012/10/26/helene-leblanc-7/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/helene-leblanc/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4140/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "p3025033",
"h1": {
"en": "Routine Proceedings",
"fr": "Affaires Courantes"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Questions on the Order Paper",
"fr": "Questions au Feuilleton"
},
"h3": {
"en": "Question No. 866",
"fr": "Question no 866"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2012/10/26/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2012%2F10%2F26%2F"
}
}