This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2012-01-30 16:55:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Alain Gigu\u00e8re (Marc-Aur\u00e8le-Fortin, NDP)",
"fr": "M. Alain Gigu\u00e8re (Marc-Aur\u00e8le-Fortin, NPD)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2668190\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Mr. Speaker, I have a question for my esteemed colleague.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2668191\" data-originallang=\"fr\">He has only good things to say about this new pension plan, but at the same time, the <a data-HoCid=\"78738\" href=\"/politicians/stephen-harper/\" title=\"Stephen Harper\">Prime Minister</a> of Canada announced in Davos that cuts would have to be made to the income security system, because Canada would no longer be able to pay for pensions. If this system is so extraordinary and successful, why is it that they are not changing their actuarial studies in their conclusions?</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2668192\" data-originallang=\"fr\">In theory, if a pension plan is working, people no longer need the support of public pension funds like income security and the guaranteed income supplement.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2668193\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Since that is not the case, this shows at the same time that they admit from the outset that the system is not working. </p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2668190\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, ma question s'adresse \u00e0 mon distingu\u00e9 confr\u00e8re.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2668191\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Il ne nous parle qu'en bien de ce nouveau r\u00e9gime de pensions, mais en m\u00eame temps, le <a data-HoCid=\"78738\" href=\"/politicians/stephen-harper/\" title=\"Stephen Harper\">premier ministre </a> du Canada a annonc\u00e9 \u00e0 Davos qu'on devait couper dans le r\u00e9gime de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 du revenu, car on ne serait plus capable de payer les pensions. Si ce r\u00e9gime est si extraordinaire et performant, comment explique-t-il qu'en aucun cas ils ne changent les \u00e9tudes actuarielles dans leurs conclusions?</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2668192\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> En th\u00e9orie, si un r\u00e9gime de pensions est performant, les gens n'ont plus besoin du soutien des fonds de pension publics comme la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 du revenu et le Suppl\u00e9ment de revenu garanti.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2668193\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Comme ce n'est pas le cas, \u00e7a montre en m\u00eame temps qu'ils reconnaissent d\u00e8s le d\u00e9part l'\u00e9chec de ce r\u00e9gime.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2012/1/30/alain-giguere-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/alain-giguere/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4060/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "6458607",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": "Initiatives minist\u00e9rielles"
},
"h2": {
"en": "Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act",
"fr": "Loi sur les r\u00e9gimes de pension agr\u00e9\u00e9s collectifs"
},
"document_url": "/debates/2012/1/30/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2012%2F1%2F30%2F"
}
}