This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2011-02-17 15:40:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mrs. Bonnie Crombie",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2330405\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, this is yet another smokescreen. It was the Liberals who were prudent fiscal managers. It was the Liberals who reduced the corporate tax rate. What the member is talking about is clearly a smokescreen in the same way that those documents the government just tabled were a smokescreen. It is a continuation of this culture of deceit.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2330406\" data-originallang=\"en\">Granted, the government tabled a number of documents that we had requested, but only because we shamed it into it. We asked for documents in three areas. Granted, the government provided a little on corporate tax cuts, but nothing on F-35s and nothing in the area of the corporate crime bills.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2330407\" data-originallang=\"en\">We asked for information on 18 crime bills and received nothing. There is insufficient information to make logical, rational decisions on which we base our fiduciary responsibilities.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2330405\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, c'est un autre \u00e9cran de fum\u00e9e. Ce sont les lib\u00e9raux qui \u00e9taient des gestionnaires financiers prudents. Ce sont les lib\u00e9raux qui ont r\u00e9duit le taux d'imposition des entreprises. Ce que la d\u00e9put\u00e9e dit n'est qu'un \u00e9cran de fum\u00e9e, tout comme les documents que le gouvernement vient de d\u00e9poser sont un \u00e9cran de fum\u00e9e. C'est une continuation de la culture de tromperie.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2330406\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il est vrai que le gouvernement a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 un certain nombre de documents que nous avions demand\u00e9s, mais seulement parce que nous l'avons contraint par la honte. Nous avons demand\u00e9 des documents portant sur trois questions. Le gouvernement en a fourni quelques-uns sur la r\u00e9duction de l'imp\u00f4t des entreprises, mais il n'a fourni aucun document sur les F-35 ou les projets de loi concernant la criminalit\u00e9 d'entreprise.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2330407\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous avons demand\u00e9 des renseignements sur 18 projets de loi en mati\u00e8re de criminalit\u00e9, et nous n'avons rien re\u00e7u. Nous ne poss\u00e9dons pas de renseignements suffisants pour prendre des d\u00e9cisions logiques et rationnelles qui sont compatibles avec nos responsabilit\u00e9s fiduciaires. </p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2011/2/17/bonnie-crombie-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/bonnie-crombie/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1000/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "3759545",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "Business of Supply",
"fr": ""
},
"h3": {
"en": "Opposition Motion--Documents Requested by the Standing Committee on Finance",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2011/2/17/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2011%2F2%2F17%2F"
}
}