This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2010-12-08 17:20:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Hon. Marlene Jennings",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2235646\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Madam Speaker, it is true that this bill does not establish the need to provide a sample to the person from whom the bodily substances were taken. However, I have always thought that, at least in penitentiaries and halfway houses, the entire sample of bodily substances is not usually required for the diagnostic test. Thus, the accused, the inmate or the person subject to the sampling may request that a portion of the sample be sent to a laboratory of his choice, or one that is certified, for example, by the Correctional Service of Canada. This should be carefully examined because we must ensure that procedures are put in place to permit an independent analysis. I hope that the Senate will take a closer look at that.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2235646\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Madame la Pr\u00e9sidente, il est vrai que dans ce projet de loi, on n'\u00e9tablit pas la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de fournir un \u00e9chantillon \u00e0 la personne de qui les substances corporelles ont \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9lev\u00e9es. Par contre, j'ai toujours cru que, du moins dans les p\u00e9nitenciers et dans les maisons de transition, lorsque des \u00e9chantillons de substances corporelles sont pr\u00e9lev\u00e9s, tout l'\u00e9chantillon n'est pas n\u00e9cessaire normalement pour le test diagnostique. Ainsi, le pr\u00e9venu, le d\u00e9tenu ou la personne faisant l'objet de ce pr\u00e9l\u00e8vement peut demander qu'une partie de l'\u00e9chantillon soit envoy\u00e9e \u00e0 un laboratoire de son choix ou qui est certifi\u00e9, par exemple, par le Service correctionnel du Canada, pour une \u00e9valuation ind\u00e9pendante. C'est une chose qui devrait \u00eatre regard\u00e9e de pr\u00e8s car il faut s'assurer que des proc\u00e9dures sont mises en place pour permettre une analyse ind\u00e9pendante. J'esp\u00e8re que le S\u00e9nat regardera cela de pr\u00e8s.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2010/12/8/marlene-jennings-6/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/marlene-jennings/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/2702/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "3648991",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "Criminal Code",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2010/12/8/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2010%2F12%2F8%2F"
}
}