This is a single speech (house debate) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2010-10-04 12:55:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Jim Maloway (Elmwood\u2014Transcona, NDP)",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2088932\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, the United States has had laws similar to this since 2002 and in the eight years since then, the problem is getting bigger, not smaller. In fact as of 2009, the United States had 49% of the world's sites. The top five countries, that is, the United States, Russia, Canada, Japan and South Korea, have 87% of the sites, with 13% in the other 55 countries. The fact of the matter is that Germany and Sweden are not on the list because they effectively block the sites. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2088933\" data-originallang=\"en\">The government is spending even more money. It is putting another $42 million toward police resources to fight a problem that is getting bigger. I really do not see that as the answer. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2088934\" data-originallang=\"en\">The answer comes from looking at best practices. Obviously, the best practices are not in the United States, but in Germany and Sweden. I would ask the member whether he would agree with that analysis and that we should ask the government to look at the practices in those two countries.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2088932\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, les \u00c9tats-Unis ont des lois semblables depuis 2002. Huit ans ont pass\u00e9, et le probl\u00e8me s\u2019aggrave au lieu de s\u2019att\u00e9nuer. En 2009, les \u00c9tats-Unis monopolisaient 49 p. 100 des sites dans le monde entier. Les pays qui figurent aux cinq premiers rangs, c\u2019est-\u00e0-dire les \u00c9tats-Unis, la Russie, le Canada, le Japon et la Cor\u00e9e du Sud, ont 87 p. 100 des sites, et les 55 autres pays se partagent les 13 p. 100 qui restent. L\u2019Allemagne et la Su\u00e8de ne figurent m\u00eame pas sur la liste parce qu\u2019elles bloquent efficacement les sites. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2088933\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le gouvernement d\u00e9pense encore plus d\u2019argent. Il injecte encore 42 millions de dollars dans les ressources polici\u00e8res pour combattre un probl\u00e8me qui ne fait que s\u2019aggraver. Je ne crois vraiment pas que ce soit la r\u00e9ponse.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2088934\" data-originallang=\"en\">On peut trouver la solution en \u00e9tudiant les pratiques exemplaires. De toute \u00e9vidence ces pratiques ne se trouvent pas aux \u00c9tats-Unis, mais en Allemagne et en Su\u00e8de. Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 accepte-t-il l\u2019analyse que je propose et est-il d\u2019accord pour que nous demandions au gouvernement d\u2019\u00e9tudier les pratiques de ces deux pays?</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2010/10/4/jim-maloway-6/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/jim-maloway/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1111/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "3328926",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Protecting Children from Online Sexual Exploitation Act",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2010/10/4/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2010%2F10%2F4%2F"
    }
}