This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2010-10-26 17:25:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Bill Siksay",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2118511\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I will try again with another angle because I suspect there are things that we can learn from the experience of Quebec when it comes to passing legislation in this area and administering that legislation.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2118512\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I know the member is not supporting Bill <a data-HoCid=\"4543568\" href=\"/bills/40-3/C-29/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act\">C-29</a> and that she sees it as an intrusion into the jurisdiction of Quebec, but the bill exempts business contact information from the provisions of PIPEDA, which means that any information an organization or business collects, uses or discloses solely for the purposes of communicating or facilitating communication with the individual in relation to their employment, business or profession is exempt.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2118513\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I am just wondering if there is a similar exemption for business contact information in the Quebec legislation, which is now being contemplated in the bill that we have before us today here in the House.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2118511\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, je vais essayer d\u2019adopter un autre angle, car je soup\u00e7onne que nous pouvons tirer des enseignements de l\u2019exp\u00e9rience qu\u00e9b\u00e9coise pour l\u00e9gif\u00e9rer en ce domaine et appliquer les dispositions l\u00e9gislatives.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2118512\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je sais que la d\u00e9put\u00e9e n\u2019appuie pas le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"4543568\" href=\"/bills/40-3/C-29/\" title=\"An Act to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act\">C-29</a> et qu\u2019elle y voit une ing\u00e9rence dans les comp\u00e9tences du Qu\u00e9bec, mais le projet de loi soustrait les coordonn\u00e9es d\u2019affaires aux dispositions de la LPRPDE. C\u2019est ainsi qu\u2019est soustrait \u00e0 l\u2019application de la loi tout renseignement qu\u2019une organisation ou une entreprise recueille, utilise ou communique uniquement pour entrer en contact \u2014 ou pour faciliter la prise de contact \u2014 avec un individu dans le cadre de son emploi, de son entreprise ou de sa profession.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2118513\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Je me demande simplement si, dans la l\u00e9gislation qu\u00e9b\u00e9coise, il existe pour les coordonn\u00e9es d\u2019affaires une exemption semblable \u00e0 celle qui est envisag\u00e9e dans le projet de loi dont la Chambre est saisie.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2010/10/26/bill-siksay-5/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/bill-siksay/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1264/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "3420019",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "Safeguarding Canadians' Personal Information Act",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2010/10/26/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2010%2F10%2F26%2F"
}
}