This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2009-06-15 13:35:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Guy Andr\u00e9 (Berthier\u2014Maskinong\u00e9, BQ)",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"1555591\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Mr. Speaker, I would like to compliment our NDP colleague on his good speech on this matter. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"1555592\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> I would ask him to explain the position of the Liberals further. They did the same thing with EI. They were a long time in office, as we well know. They plundered $55 billion from the employment insurance fund, rejected any improvement to the employment insurance plan and now say that they want an election to improve the situation of workers, something we know they will not do. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"1555593\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> As regards the securities commission, they voted in favour of our motion the last time. Now, at the dawn of an election campaign, they are hiding behind the idea of consulting the Supreme Court on this, when we know that it is under exclusive provincial jurisdiction. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"1555594\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> I would like our colleague to explain this sham position of the Liberal Party further. </p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"1555591\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, je voudrais souligner le bon discours du coll\u00e8gue du NPD sur ce sujet. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"1555592\" data-originallang=\"fr\">J'aimerais qu'il explique davantage la position des lib\u00e9raux. Ils ont fait la m\u00eame chose dans le cas de l'assurance-emploi. Ils ont \u00e9t\u00e9 longtemps au pouvoir, on le sait tr\u00e8s bien. Ils ont pill\u00e9 la caisse d'assurance-emploi de 55 milliards de dollars, ils ont refus\u00e9 toute bonification au r\u00e9gime d'assurance-emploi et ils disent maintenant qu'ils veulent faire une campagne \u00e9lectorale pour am\u00e9liorer le sort des travailleurs, chose qu'on sait qu'ils ne feront pas. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"1555593\" data-originallang=\"fr\">En ce qui a trait \u00e0 la Commission des valeurs mobili\u00e8res, ils avaient vot\u00e9 en faveur de notre motion la derni\u00e8re fois. Maintenant, \u00e0 l'aube d'une campagne \u00e9lectorale, ils se cachent derri\u00e8re l'id\u00e9e qu'ils vont consulter la Cour supr\u00eame \u00e0 ce sujet, alors qu'on sait que c'est une comp\u00e9tence qui rel\u00e8ve exclusivement du Qu\u00e9bec. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"1555594\" data-originallang=\"fr\">J'aimerais que notre coll\u00e8gue nous explique davantage cette position fausse du Parti lib\u00e9ral.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2009/6/15/guy-andre-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/guy-andre/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1460/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "2833962",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "Business of Supply",
"fr": ""
},
"h3": {
"en": "Opposition Motion \u2014 Securities Regulation",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2009/6/15/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2009%2F6%2F15%2F"
}
}