This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2009-02-24 12:15:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Paul Cr\u00eate (Montmagny\u2014L'Islet\u2014Kamouraska\u2014Rivi\u00e8re-du-Loup, BQ)",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"1305230\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Mr. Speaker, I very much appreciated the speech by my colleague from <a data-HoCid=\"128287\" href=\"/politicians/paule-brunelle/\" title=\"Paule Brunelle\">Trois-Rivi\u00e8res</a>, who is as clear as ever. I have one brief question to ask her. Is it not a little surprising that it has been decided to include in Bill <a data-HoCid=\"3636372\" href=\"/bills/40-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on January 27, 2009 and related fiscal measures\">C-10</a> implementing the budget a clause establishing a securities commission?</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"1305231\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Is this not the vengeance or influence of the Ontario lobby, which will have the support of the Conservative members from Quebec? In the end, there was no connection to the economic crisis, as was recognized by the OECD and by the person responsible on the committee that introduced the bank papers solution. Are we not faced here with a situation where the federal government, both Conservatives and Liberals, has decided to take advantage of a budget implementation act to propose a centralizing motion? Is this not a very concrete example that here only the Bloc Qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois is defending the real interests of Quebec?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"1305230\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ai bien appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 le discours de ma coll\u00e8gue de <a data-HoCid=\"128287\" href=\"/politicians/paule-brunelle/\" title=\"Paule Brunelle\">Trois-Rivi\u00e8res</a> qui est toujours aussi claire. J'ai une br\u00e8ve question \u00e0 lui poser. N'est-il pas un peu surprenant qu'on ait d\u00e9cid\u00e9 d'inclure dans le projet de loi <a data-HoCid=\"3636372\" href=\"/bills/40-2/C-10/\" title=\"An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on January 27, 2009 and related fiscal measures\">C-10</a>, qui met en oeuvre le budget, une clause cr\u00e9ant une commission des valeurs mobili\u00e8res?</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"1305231\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> N'est-ce pas une vengeance ou un effet du lobby ontarien auquel souscriront les d\u00e9put\u00e9s conservateurs qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois? En bout de ligne, il n'y avait aucun lien avec la crise \u00e9conomique, ce qui a d'ailleurs \u00e9t\u00e9 reconnu par l'OCDE et par la personne responsable du comit\u00e9 qui a mis en place la solution concernant les papiers bancaires. Ne sommes-nous pas devant une situation o\u00f9 le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral, conservateurs et lib\u00e9raux confondus, a d\u00e9cid\u00e9 de profiter d'un projet de loi budg\u00e9taire pour mettre de l'avant une motion centralisatrice? N'est-ce pas un exemple tr\u00e8s concret qu'ici, seul le Bloc qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois d\u00e9fend les vrais int\u00e9r\u00eats du Qu\u00e9bec?</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2009/2/24/paul-crete-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/73/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/381/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "2613304",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "Business of Supply",
"fr": ""
},
"h3": {
"en": "Opposition Motion\u2014Securities Commission and Equalization",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2009/2/24/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2009%2F2%2F24%2F"
}
}