This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2008-01-31 15:30:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Hon. Stockwell Day (Minister of Public Safety, CPC)",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"874997\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, my colleague's question came up in the committee and it was as a matter of some concern.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"874998\" data-originallang=\"en\">A number of provisions are in place to protect the individual who is being detained from untoward situations that may arise in the course of the actions that would unfold. As a matter of fact, in the committee discussion it was agreed that there could be some things that would come up that would actually be unpredictable and that there needed to be something in place to allow for that.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"874999\" data-originallang=\"en\">One of the ways of addressing that is in clause 85.2(c), which is a catch-all provision that can be applied for and asked for by the special advocate himself or herself. There would also be provisions for the person being detained and I think, if in not all cases, in most cases they would have their own counsel. There would be provisions to ensure the person is protected from such an eventuality related to client-solicitor privilege.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"874997\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, la question de mon coll\u00e8gue a \u00e9t\u00e9 pos\u00e9e pendant la r\u00e9union du comit\u00e9, et cela a soulev\u00e9 des pr\u00e9occupations.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"874998\" data-originallang=\"en\">Un certain nombre de dispositions ont \u00e9t\u00e9 mises en place pour prot\u00e9ger la personne qui est d\u00e9tenue de situations f\u00e2cheuses qui pourraient se produire. En fait, dans le cadre des discussions du comit\u00e9, on a convenu qu'il y avait des situations impr\u00e9visibles qui pouvaient se produire, et que des dispositifs devraient \u00eatre mis en place pour parer \u00e0 cette \u00e9ventualit\u00e9.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"874999\" data-originallang=\"en\">Une des fa\u00e7ons d'aborder cette question se trouve \u00e0 l'alin\u00e9a 85.2<em>c</em>), qui est une disposition globale pouvant \u00eatre demand\u00e9e par l'avocat sp\u00e9cial lui-m\u00eame. Il y aurait \u00e9galement des dispositions pour les personnes d\u00e9tenues et je crois que dans la plupart des cas, sinon tous, les personnes auraient leur propre avocat. Des dispositions relatives au secret professionnel des avocats permettraient de prot\u00e9ger la personne \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard. </p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2008/1/31/stockwell-day-6/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/stockwell-day/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1282/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "2291460",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "Immigration and Refugee Protection Act",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2008/1/31/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2008%2F1%2F31%2F"
}
}