This is a single speech (house debate) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2007-05-10 11:10:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Ms. Diane Ablonczy",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"608762\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, during my remarks I quoted from a number of experts. I know sometimes people do not believe politicians, but I quoted from a number of experts who say that stopping a tax loophole like double-dipping, a loophole which allows a company to make two deductions for a single expense, is the right thing to do. It is supported by experts. It was supported, as the member will know, by our own finance committee and the public accounts committee in the House of Commons. It was called for by the Auditor General. It was called for by the Jack Mintz panel, the Technical Committee on Business Taxation, and by many others. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"608763\" data-originallang=\"en\">It was called for because it is the right thing to do. It levels the playing field. It allows everyone to have lower taxes instead of having big tax subsidies, tax loopholes and tax havens for a few. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"608764\" data-originallang=\"en\">As the member will know, our government is committed to addressing other tax loopholes that are identified and other tax havens which distort our tax system. I am not saying that no one is going to make cries of pain when these things happen. We all know that does occur. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"608765\" data-originallang=\"en\">Our government is very sensitive to input from members of Parliament, such as my friend opposite, from the business community and from other experts. We want to make sure that when we move forward on these measures, as we have on the double-dipping, that we do so in the best way possible for our economy and for those affected. We will be doing that and are doing that.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"608766\" data-originallang=\"en\">These dire warnings that somehow this is going to cause huge economic problems for the country are simply not true. Many experts have said that as well. I hope my friend will be reassured by that.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"608762\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ai cit\u00e9 tout \u00e0 l'heure un certain nombre d'experts. Je sais que, parfois, les gens ne croient pas les politiciens, mais les experts que j'ai cit\u00e9s disent qu'il est tout \u00e0 fait judicieux d'\u00e9liminer une \u00e9chappatoire fiscale comme la double d\u00e9duction, qui permet aux entreprises de d\u00e9duire deux fois la m\u00eame d\u00e9pense. Les experts souscrivent \u00e0 cette mesure. En outre, comme le d\u00e9put\u00e9 le sait, la mesure a \u00e9t\u00e9 appuy\u00e9e par le Comit\u00e9 des finances, dont je fais partie, et par le Comit\u00e9 des comptes publics des Communes. La v\u00e9rificatrice g\u00e9n\u00e9rale avait r\u00e9clam\u00e9 cette mesure, tout comme le comit\u00e9 de Jack Mintz, c'est-\u00e0-dire le Comit\u00e9 technique de la fiscalit\u00e9 des entreprises, ainsi que de nombreuses autres personnes.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"608763\" data-originallang=\"en\">C'est une mesure qui \u00e9tait beaucoup r\u00e9clam\u00e9e parce qu'elle est tout \u00e0 fait judicieuse. Elle met tout le monde sur un pied d'\u00e9galit\u00e9. L'ensemble des contribuables peut ainsi b\u00e9n\u00e9ficier d'une r\u00e9duction du fardeau fiscal, au lieu d'en voir un petit nombre profiter de g\u00e9n\u00e9reuses subventions \u00e0 caract\u00e8re fiscal, d'\u00e9chappatoires fiscales et de paradis fiscaux.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"608764\" data-originallang=\"en\">Comme le d\u00e9put\u00e9 le sait, notre gouvernement a la ferme volont\u00e9 d'\u00e9liminer \u00e9galement les autres \u00e9chappatoires fiscales connues et les autres possibilit\u00e9s de profiter des paradis fiscaux qui d\u00e9naturent notre syst\u00e8me fiscal. Je ne dis pas qu'il n'y aura pas de protestations lorsque nous adopterons ce genre de mesures. Nous savons tous qu'il y en aura.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"608765\" data-originallang=\"en\">Notre gouvernement est tr\u00e8s sensible aux points de vue des d\u00e9put\u00e9s, comme mon coll\u00e8gue d'en face, du monde des affaires et des autres experts. Nous voulons nous assurer que, lorsque nous appliquerons des mesures comme celle qui consiste \u00e0 mettre fin \u00e0 la double d\u00e9duction, nous agirons de mani\u00e8re aussi favorable que possible pour l'\u00e9conomie du pays et en nuisant le moins possible aux personnes touch\u00e9es. C'est ce que nous allons faire et c'est du reste ce que nous faisons d\u00e9j\u00e0.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"608766\" data-originallang=\"en\">On se trompe tout simplement lorsqu'on pousse des cris d'alarme voulant que cette mesure entra\u00eene d'\u00e9normes probl\u00e8mes \u00e9conomiques au pays. De nombreux experts disent la m\u00eame chose que moi. J'esp\u00e8re que mon coll\u00e8gue sera d\u00e9sormais rassur\u00e9.</p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2007/5/10/diane-ablonczy-2/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/diane-ablonczy/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1243/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "2072825",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Government Orders",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Business of Supply",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2007/5/10/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2007%2F5%2F10%2F"
    }
}