This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2007-02-26 16:35:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Brian Murphy (Moncton\u2014Riverview\u2014Dieppe, Lib.)",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"458472\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, my friend's comments were reasoned and they were, after some emotion in the chamber, welcome. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"458473\" data-originallang=\"en\">I do want to pick his brains somewhat on what I consider to be the crux of the issue. When most of us were handling red hot copies of the decision on Friday around 9 or 10 o'clock we saw that there are provisions in other acts that deal with the war on terror Canadian style, which is much more deliberative cooperation between the judiciary, the investigative and the legislative branches. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"458474\" data-originallang=\"en\">There is a growth in terror legislation and how it is being interpreted. We have talked a lot about the 2004 <em>Vancouver Sun</em> case on section 83.28 vis-\u00e0-vis investigative hearings. We are up in the air with respect to preventive arrests. We saw on Friday that legislation was attacked successfully in part. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"458475\" data-originallang=\"en\">I can tell from my colleague's speech that this debate is very important to him. Does my colleague concede that we need, in addition to this debate, to take a holistic approach to anti-terrorism legislation in this country as the Senate report says?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"458472\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, mon coll\u00e8gue a fait des commentaires sens\u00e9s, qui, apr\u00e8s avoir caus\u00e9 une certaine \u00e9motion \u00e0 la Chambre, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 bien accueillis.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"458473\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'aimerais lui poser certaines questions au sujet de ce qui, \u00e0 mon avis, constitue le noeud de la question. Vendredi, vers 9 ou 10 heures, tandis que la plupart d'entre nous tenions en main un exemplaire de la d\u00e9cision qui venait d'\u00eatre rendue, nous avons constat\u00e9 qu'il existe des dispositions dans d'autres lois qui abordent la lutte contre le terrorisme selon des m\u00e9thodes propres aux Canadiens. Celles-ci sont fond\u00e9es sur la coop\u00e9ration d\u00e9lib\u00e9rative entre le judiciaire, l'ex\u00e9cutif et ceux qui m\u00e8nent les enqu\u00eates.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"458474\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous sommes t\u00e9moins de l'\u00e9volution des mesures l\u00e9gislatives antiterroristes et de la fa\u00e7on de les interpr\u00e9ter. Nous avons beaucoup parl\u00e9 de l'affaire du <em>Vancouver Sun</em> de 2004 portant sur l'article 83.28 concernant les audiences d'investigation. Nous ne savons plus quoi penser des arrestations pr\u00e9ventives. Vendredi, nous avons vu qu'on a r\u00e9ussi, en partie, \u00e0 s'opposer \u00e0 la loi. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"458475\" data-originallang=\"en\">Le discours de mon coll\u00e8gue me montre que ce d\u00e9bat lui tient \u00e0 coeur. Mon coll\u00e8gue reconna\u00eet-il que dans notre pays, en plus de ce d\u00e9bat, nous devrions adopter une approche d'ensemble en mati\u00e8re de l\u00e9gislation antiterroriste, comme le sugg\u00e8re le rapport du S\u00e9nat?</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2007/2/26/brian-murphy-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/brian-murphy/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/519/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "1935785",
"h1": {
"en": "Orders of the Day",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "Anti-terrorism Act",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2007/2/26/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2007%2F2%2F26%2F"
}
}