This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2007-12-11 19:55:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Linda J. Keen",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"831143\" data-originallang=\"en\">What we require, Mr. Chair, is one of two things. The current safety case before the commission, which AECL submitted to us, required the two pumps to be installed before the reactor started up. AECL would like to put a new safety case before us and the real part of the safety case is one pump instead of two. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"831144\" data-originallang=\"en\">If AECL wants to do one pump only, it must have a licence amendment. It must do this, and all it has to do is request a licence amendment and have a completed safety case. If it does not have a completed safety case, in our view as nuclear experts this facility is not within the licence, is in a violation of the licence, and in our view is not safe enough.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"831143\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident, nous avons besoin de l'une des deux choses suivantes. Le dossier de s\u00fbret\u00e9 qu'EACL a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 \u00e0 la commission et qui y est actuellement \u00e0 l'\u00e9tude exige que les deux pompes soient install\u00e9es avant la remise en marche du r\u00e9acteur. EACL aimerait nous pr\u00e9senter un nouveau dossier de s\u00fbret\u00e9 qui porterait v\u00e9ritablement sur l'utilisation d'une pompe au lieu de deux. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"831144\" data-originallang=\"en\">Si EACL veut utiliser une seule pompe, il lui faut faire modifier son permis. Elle n'a pas le choix. Il lui suffit de demander une modification de permis et de pr\u00e9senter un dossier de s\u00fbret\u00e9 complet. \u00c0 d\u00e9faut d'un tel dossier, \u00e0 notre avis, \u00e0 titre d'experts du domaine nucl\u00e9aire, cette centrale n'est pas conforme au permis et y contrevient et de notre point de vue n'est pas suffisamment s\u00fbre. </p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2007/12/11/linda-j-keen-4/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "2267729",
"h1": {
"en": "Government Orders",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "An Act to permit the resumption and continuation of the operation of the National Research Universal Reactor at Chalk River",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2007/12/11/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2007%2F12%2F11%2F"
}
}