This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2007-10-18 15:45:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Peggy Nash (Parkdale\u2014High Park, NDP)",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"752111\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, I am having some trouble following the hon. member's logic. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"752112\" data-originallang=\"en\">She is obviously very much in support of the Conservative government's crime agenda and has gone to great pains to lay out all of her support for that agenda. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"752113\" data-originallang=\"en\">Clearly her party is supporting the throne speech, even though it goes the wrong way on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. It is going to allow Canadian troops to stay on in a combat mission. It does nothing to help people who are falling further and further behind economically. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"752114\" data-originallang=\"en\">Clearly she and her caucus are all on the same page, the Liberals and the Conservatives, on all of these issues. Yet she is attacking the NDP at a time when the Liberals lost the confidence of Canadians because of scandals, corruption and the whole Gomery inquiry testimony that really exposed a lot of the weaknesses in the Liberal Party, and--</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"752111\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, j'ai un peu de difficult\u00e9 \u00e0 suivre la logique de la d\u00e9put\u00e9e.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"752112\" data-originallang=\"en\">De toute \u00e9vidence, elle appuie le programme gouvernemental de lutte contre la criminalit\u00e9 et elle s'est donn\u00e9 beaucoup de mal pour expliquer ce soutien.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"752113\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il est clair que son parti appuie le discours du Tr\u00f4ne, m\u00eame s'il va dans la mauvaise direction dans la r\u00e9duction des \u00e9missions de GES, m\u00eame s'il pr\u00e9voit que les troupes canadiennes continueront leur mission de combat, m\u00eame s'il ne fait rien pour aider les gens qui ont de plus en plus de difficult\u00e9 \u00e0 s'en sortir financi\u00e8rement.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"752114\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il est clair que la d\u00e9put\u00e9e et son caucus s'entendent, que les lib\u00e9raux et les conservateurs s'entendent sur toutes ces questions. Pourtant, elle attaque le NPD \u00e0 un moment o\u00f9 les lib\u00e9raux ont perdu la confiance des Canadiens en raison de scandales, de la corruption et des t\u00e9moignages entendus tout au long des travaux de la Commission Gomery et qui ont mis au jour beaucoup des faiblesses du Parti lib\u00e9ral...</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2007/10/18/peggy-nash-4/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/peggy-nash/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/522/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "2176270",
"h1": {
"en": "Speech from the Throne",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "Resumption of debate on Address in Reply",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2007/10/18/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2007%2F10%2F18%2F"
}
}