This is a single speech (house debate) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2006-04-07 14:10:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Serge Cardin (Sherbrooke, BQ)",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"40455\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Mr. Speaker, first, allow me to congratulate all members of this House who were elected on January 23. This is a show of trust, until proven otherwise.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40456\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Let us look at the so-called universal $1,200 allowance for families with children under six. We are now learning that this allowance will be tax free for low income families. Pardon me, but that smacks of improvisation. The federal government is getting very much involved in the area of family policy, which is in the jurisdiction of Quebec and the provinces. In fact, Quebec and the provinces, and they alone, know how to manage their family policies properly, with all their ins and outs.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40457\" data-originallang=\"fr\">I would like to emphasize certain elements of a recent study published by three professors from the University of Sherbrooke: </p>\n<blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"40458\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Providing an allowance of $1,200 a year to parents with children six and under could impoverish low income families, and single mothers in particular\u2014 </p>\n</blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"40459\" data-originallang=\"fr\">The study also states:</p>\n<blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"40460\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> \u2014should Ottawa pay $1,200 to families instead of transferring funding to the Quebec government, Quebec will be forced to raise daycare fees and ask parents to contribute a larger share. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40461\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Let us not forget that the [name of Prime Minister] government's initiative will deprive Quebec of some $800 million. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40462\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> The end result varies depending on assumptions or scenarios. Abject poverty, measured one way, could be increased by up to 60%. </p>\n</blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"40463\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Finally, these professors also consider that such a shift could act as a barrier to employment.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40464\" data-originallang=\"fr\">I think it is obvious that this policy is another trick the Conservatives have learned from the Liberals, a trick to boost their visibility: a maple leaf on a $1,200 cheque. I do not think that the government's objectives can be achieved in that context.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40465\" data-originallang=\"fr\">I believe in the freedom of the provinces and Quebec in the area of child care. Naturally, parents who are staying at home with their children might choose to buy nicer crayons. But to say that people will enjoy greater freedom of choice with $1,200 is really improvising.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"40455\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, tout d'abord, permettez-moi de f\u00e9liciter l'ensemble des d\u00e9put\u00e9s de cette Chambre qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9lus le 23 janvier dernier. C'est une preuve de confiance, jusqu'\u00e0 preuve du contraire. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40456\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Parlons de l'allocation de 1 200 $ \u2014 que l'on dit universelle \u2014 vers\u00e9e aux familles ayant des enfants de six ans et moins. On pr\u00e9cise maintenant que cette somme sera non imposable pour les familles \u00e0 faible revenu. Pardonnez-moi, mais cela sent passablement l'improvisation. \u00c0 vrai dire, le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral s'investit grandement dans les politiques familiales, qui rel\u00e8vent de la comp\u00e9tence du Qu\u00e9bec et des provinces. De fait, seuls le Qu\u00e9bec et les provinces savent g\u00e9rer convenablement leurs politiques familiales et tous leurs tenants et aboutissants. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40457\" data-originallang=\"fr\">J'aimerais souligner quelques \u00e9l\u00e9ments d'une \u00e9tude faite r\u00e9cemment par trois professeurs de l'Universit\u00e9 de Sherbrooke: </p>\n<blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"40458\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Verser une allocation annuelle de 1 200 $ aux parents d'enfants de six ans et moins pourrait appauvrir les familles \u00e0 faible revenu, particuli\u00e8rement les m\u00e8res monoparentales [...] </p>\n</blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"40459\" data-originallang=\"fr\">De plus, il est dit dans cette \u00e9tude: </p>\n<blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"40460\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> [...] si Ottawa verse 1 200 $ aux familles plut\u00f4t que d'accorder un transfert au gouvernement qu\u00e9b\u00e9cois, ce dernier devra augmenter les tarifs des garderies et demandera une plus grande contribution des parents. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40461\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Rappelons que la nouvelle mesure du gouvernement [le nom du premier ministre] privera le Qu\u00e9bec d'environ 800 millions de dollars. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40462\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Tout d\u00e9pend des hypoth\u00e8ses ou des mesures prises, on arrive \u00e0 diff\u00e9rents r\u00e9sultats. Si on prend la mesure de pauvret\u00e9 la plus compl\u00e8te, on peut augmenter la pauvret\u00e9 jusqu'\u00e0 60 p. 100. </p>\n</blockquote><p data-HoCid=\"40463\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Enfin, ces professeurs consid\u00e8rent \u00e9galement que ce tournant pourrait \u00eatre une barri\u00e8re \u00e0 l'emploi. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40464\" data-originallang=\"fr\">D'apr\u00e8s moi, il est \u00e9vident que cette politique est encore une technique que les conservateurs ont tr\u00e8s bien apprise des lib\u00e9raux \u2014 une technique de visibilit\u00e9, de feuille d'\u00e9rable sur le ch\u00e8que de 1 200 $. Je ne crois pas que les objectifs vis\u00e9s par le gouvernement peuvent \u00eatre atteints dans ce contexte. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"40465\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Je crois en la libert\u00e9 des provinces et du Qu\u00e9bec dans le contexte des garderies. Bien s\u00fbr, certains parents, qui sont d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e0 la maison avec des enfants, peuvent d\u00e9cider d'acheter des crayons de couleur. Toutefois, dire que les gens peuvent avoir une grande libert\u00e9 de choix avec 1 200 $, c'est vraiment improviser la situation. </p>"
    },
    "url": "/debates/2006/4/7/serge-cardin-1/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/serge-cardin/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/3677/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "1500625",
    "h1": {
        "en": "Speech from the Throne",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "h2": {
        "en": "Resumption of debate on Address in Reply",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "document_url": "/debates/2006/4/7/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2006%2F4%2F7%2F"
    }
}